# The theological implications of Nancy Grace

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [July 8, 2010, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968 "2010-07-08T15:41:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/21 "2010-07-09T12:57:06Z")

</div>

> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#):
>
> Keira Knightley is the lesser alternate to Natalie–the best of the scribbles from Eru’s artist pad before Portman was made.

This is a shocking blasphemy for which a just God will surely smite you. :mad:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 1:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/22 "2010-07-09T13:20:55Z")

</div>

> [@Susanann](#):
>
> Wow!
> 
> Until I saw this topic, I thought I was the only one who thought she was annoying.

You are most certainly not the only one.

I remember her from way back in her CourtTV days. She was covering the trial of a young man accused of murdering some children because God told him to.

“If he thinks he’s going to get away with a plea of insanity, he’s crazy!”

Well thought out, Nance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/23 "2010-07-09T14:26:33Z")

</div>

> [@Susanann](#):
>
> Until I saw this topic, I thought I was the only one who thought she was annoying.

I had the opposite reaction when I first saw her: I was astounded that anyone might \*not \*find her too annoying to watch.

I was convinced that she was the most abrasive living television personality, right up to the moment when I first saw Jane Velez-Mitchell.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/24 "2010-07-09T14:30:20Z")

</div>

> [@astorian](#):
>
> If Natalie Portman serves God, how do you explain “Phantom Menace”?

:: works action on shotgun ::

You’re not going to sit there and blame HER for that movie instead of Lucas. Not if you know what’s good for you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 2:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/25 "2010-07-09T14:39:29Z")

</div>

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> This is a shocking blasphemy for which a just God will surely smite you. :mad:

Fool of a Dunedan!

We’ll let the masses decide. These images are obviously NSFW.

[spoiler][She who was sent by Athena sent to bring hope, warmth, and light to a world grown chill, dark, and grim.](http://www.celebritycowboy.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/natalie-portman-nude.jpg)

[The comely, but ultimately pale and inadequate shadow of the first.](http://images.picturesdepot.com/photo/s/sexy_keira_knightley-4816.jpg)[/spoiler]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mollie\_Magill](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mollie_magill/32/20882_2.png) [@Mollie\_Magill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mollie_Magill)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 3:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/26 "2010-07-09T15:08:15Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> God exists and so does the devil; NG serves the latter, Natalie Portman the former.

If Natalie Portman served the forces of good, she wouldn’t be a wacko PETA person who once seriously compared eating meat to rape. [Cite](http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/28/natalie_portman_vegan).

I humbly suggest you had meant Anna Paquin, and one of your lesser minions had changed things while you were not looking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 3:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/27 "2010-07-09T15:17:49Z")

</div>

> [@Mollie\_Magill](#):
>
> If Natalie Portman served the forces of good, she wouldn’t be a wacko PETA person who once seriously compared eating meat to rape. [Cite](http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/28/natalie_portman_vegan).
> 
> I humbly suggest you had meant Anna Paquin, and one of your lesser minions had changed things while you were not looking.

I have abandoned my villainous ambitions and thus no longer have minions.

And even angels can be 'flicted.

ETA: Paquin has a nice enough body, I suppose. But I’m a face man, and also a fan of smallish boobs, so AP doesn’t move me much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mollie\_Magill](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mollie_magill/32/20882_2.png) [@Mollie\_Magill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mollie_Magill)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 3:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/28 "2010-07-09T15:35:36Z")

</div>

> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#):
>
> I have abandoned my villainous ambitions and thus no longer have minions.
> 
> And even angels can be 'flicted.
> 
> ETA: Paquin has a nice enough body, I suppose. But I’m a face man, and also a fan of smallish boobs, so AP doesn’t move me much.

Ah, but that kiwi accent…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/29 "2010-07-09T15:57:46Z")

</div>

I figure it’s a demonstration of the consequences of free will. You can freely choose to watch Nancy Grace. But if you do so you will suffer for your actions.

So Nancy Grace is like a warning about the temptations of Satan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 4:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/30 "2010-07-09T16:02:31Z")

</div>

> [@Mollie\_Magill](#):
>
> Ah, but that kiwi accent…

Well, if we’re going by _voices_, the sexiest woman on Earth is KD Lang.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/31 "2010-07-09T16:36:59Z")

</div>

> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#):
>
> Well, if we’re going by _voices_, the sexiest woman on Earth is KD Lang.

Teri Garr.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/32 "2010-07-09T16:45:40Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Teri Garr.

The usual blather about gormless hobbits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jackdavinci](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackdavinci/32/3259_2.png) [@jackdavinci](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jackdavinci)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/33 "2010-07-09T18:18:02Z")

</div>

I have never heard of this Nancy Grace person. But I gather from your poll that I should be glad about that…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/34 "2010-07-09T18:27:48Z")

</div>

Fool of a Took!

Good fudge is its own justification!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/35 "2010-07-09T18:28:31Z")

</div>

> [@kaylasdad99](#):
>
> Fool of a Took!
> 
> Good fudge is its own justification!

😕

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 6:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/36 "2010-07-09T18:41:49Z")

</div>

They serve it with the hot fudge sundae at Claim Jumper Restaurants. It’s nummy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mollie\_Magill](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mollie_magill/32/20882_2.png) [@Mollie\_Magill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mollie_Magill)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 6:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/37 "2010-07-09T18:45:25Z")

</div>

Wait, do they serve Nancy Grace, God, Natalie Portman, kd lang, or Anna Paquin with the hot fudge?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 6:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/38 "2010-07-09T18:46:39Z")

</div>

Could I have Keira Knightley, please, with a side of fudge?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/39 "2010-07-09T18:48:36Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I have never heard of this Nancy Grace person. But I gather from your poll that I should be glad about that…

Nancy Grace is a former prosecutor. She now is the host of a cable television show about current criminal cases. These are the neutral facts about her.

Subjectively, she’s an unpleasant person. She oftens makes judgements for which she does not have sufficient factual support and then uses her show as a pulpit to disseminate her views.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 6:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/40 "2010-07-09T18:50:55Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Could I have Keira Knightley, please, with a side of fudge?

That sounds good. But can I get Rosario Dawson instead of fudge?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968.md?page=3)
