# The theological implications of Nancy Grace **URL:** \ **Category:** Cafe Society\ **Created:** [July 8, 2010, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968 "2010-07-08T15:41:20Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 12\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\ **Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/41 "2010-07-09T18:54:24Z")
> [@Little\_Nemo](#): > > Nancy Grace is a former prosecutor. She now is the host of a cable television show about current criminal cases. These are the neutral facts about her. > > Subjectively, she’s an unpleasant person. She oftens makes judgements for which she does not have sufficient factual support and then uses her show as a pulpit to disseminate her views. Not to mention that to be featured on her show, you’d better be a kid or a white female. :rolleyes: ---
**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\ **Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 7:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/42 "2010-07-09T19:43:49Z")
> [@Mollie\_Magill](#): > > Wait, do they serve Nancy Grace, God, Natalie Portman, kd lang, or Anna Paquin with the hot fudge? I’m pretty sure kd lang wouldn’t have you. ---
**Author:** ![Stuffy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f17d59/32.png) [@Stuffy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stuffy)\ **Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/43 "2010-07-09T19:55:10Z")
Great! Now I’m thinking about Nancy Grace and Hot Fudge. ---
**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\ **Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/44 "2010-07-09T20:00:38Z")
> [@Stuffy](#): > > Great! Now I’m thinking about Nancy Grace and Hot Fudge. Thank you for fucking up all future daydreams involving hot fudge. ---
**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\ **Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 8:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/45 "2010-07-09T20:03:11Z")
> [@Czarcasm](#): > > Thank you for fucking up all future daydreams involving hot fudge. I’m sending you a neuralizer. Remember you have to instruct yourself not to read that post again at the same time you wipe your memory. ---
**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\ **Post date:** [July 9, 2010, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/46 "2010-07-09T20:08:26Z")
> [@Little\_Nemo](#): > > Nancy Grace is a former prosecutor. She now is the host of a cable television show about current criminal cases. These are the neutral facts about her. > > Subjectively, she’s an unpleasant person. She oftens makes judgements for which she does not have sufficient factual support and then uses her show as a pulpit to disseminate her views. Let’s not forget that she humiliated a woman in an interview who had a missing child and basically accused the woman of killing the child, whereupon the woman went home and committed suicide. Woman killed the wrong bitch. ---
**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\ **Post date:** [July 10, 2010, 5:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/47 "2010-07-10T05:00:14Z")
I also wanted to vote that she was an instrument of Satan, but, while God may have created Ms. Portman to show off his skill at creating beauty, she’s not been serving Him for a while. Remember, God likes to create beauties and then keep them to Himself (sharing with maybe one guy.) ---
**Author:** ![DonLogan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@DonLogan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonLogan)\ **Post date:** [July 10, 2010, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/48 "2010-07-10T17:21:06Z")
Nancy Grace should be the host of a game show called “_Everybody’s Guilty Of **SOMETHING!** _” ---
**Author:** ![kasuo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/8c91f0/32.png) [@kasuo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kasuo)\ **Post date:** [July 10, 2010, 5:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/49 "2010-07-10T17:39:33Z")
> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#): > > Fool of a Dunedan! > > We’ll let the masses decide. These images are obviously NSFW. > > [spoiler][She who was sent by Athena sent to bring hope, warmth, and light to a world grown chill, dark, and grim.](http://www.celebritycowboy.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/natalie-portman-nude.jpg) > > [The comely, but ultimately pale and inadequate shadow of the first.](http://images.picturesdepot.com/photo/s/sexy_keira_knightley-4816.jpg)[/spoiler] I’d like to comely all over her pale shadow. ---
**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\ **Post date:** [July 10, 2010, 5:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/50 "2010-07-10T17:45:00Z")
> [@DonLogan](#): > > Nancy Grace should be the host of a game show called “_Everybody’s Guilty Of **SOMETHING!** _” Well, that’s actually true. She’d have to find a way to accuse people of the wrong thing,I guess. ---
**Author:** ![chrisk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@chrisk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chrisk)\ **Post date:** [July 10, 2010, 6:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/51 "2010-07-10T18:43:23Z")
I’m in the same boat as \*\* jackdavinci\*\* ---
**Author:** ![DonLogan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@DonLogan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonLogan)\ **Post date:** [July 10, 2010, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968/52 "2010-07-10T18:52:30Z")
> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#): > > Well, that’s actually true. She’d have to find a way to accuse people of the wrong thing,I guess. That’s what would be so great about it! Bring some schmuck who wants to be on tv and is willing to confess to something on, and see if Nancy can prosecute him into copping to child kidnapping and/or give the audience a multiple choice to vote on via text, and whatever they vote for, he does time for. Are you telling me this isn’t her next show after CNN? _ **A Jack Barry/Stanley Milgram Production.** _ 🙂 [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-theological-implications-of-nancy-grace/545968.md?page=2)