# The Trump 100-Day Agenda **URL:** \ **Category:** Great Debates\ **Created:** [November 22, 2016, 12:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735 "2016-11-22T12:36:42Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 14\ **Page:** 3
**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 3:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/41 "2016-11-24T03:58:25Z")
> [@Little\_Nemo](#): > > The difference is what I’ve already explained - and what you quoted. > > Obama was establishing a rule that would only apply to people seeking jobs in his administration. He wasn’t targeting people in the outgoing Bush administration. And based on the limited information available are you confident the limitation that Trump proposed would be meaningfully different? I would guess it would have to be on a go forward basis rather than retro active given the 1st amendment protections. ---
**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 12:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/42 "2016-11-24T12:46:42Z")
> [@Little\_Nemo](#): > > … > I’m just trying to figure out how this “one step forward, two steps back” principle will be applied. Exactly. What is a “regulation”? One chapter of the CFR? One section, one paragraph, one subparagraph, one sentence, one clause in a sentence? It’s pure ignorance slightly dressed up as childish thinking. The fact it passes the laugh test for anyone is horrifying. ---
**Author:** ![Icerigger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/icerigger/32/432_2.png) [@Icerigger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Icerigger)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 1:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/43 "2016-11-24T13:49:06Z")
He wants to cut all NASA funding for climate science. We are living in an Orwellian nightmare. > **[Slate | Bad Astronomy](https://slate.com/technology/bad-astronomy)** > > Everything on Slate about Bad Astronomy ---
**Author:** ![SmartAlecCat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/67e7ee/32.png) [@SmartAlecCat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SmartAlecCat)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 2:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/44 "2016-11-24T14:03:40Z")
> [@Icerigger](#): > > He wants to cut all NASA funding for climate science. We are living in an Orwellian nightmare. If you are interested in which agencies participate in climate science research, see [Our Changing Planet, FY 2017](https://downloads.globalchange.gov/ocp/ocp2017/Our-Changing-Planet_FY-2017_full.pdf) (large PDF report) On page 42, You can see NASA funds $1,549M of the total $2,599M, dwarfing all other contributions to research. If you don’t like the policy implications of science, just stop funding it and you can put your head in the sand and just make policy decisions in the absence of solid science. ---
**Author:** ![Lord\_Feldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lord_feldon/32/341_2.png) [@Lord\_Feldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Feldon)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 7:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/45 "2016-11-24T19:30:16Z")
> [@](#): > > Regulations — the incoming president says he will seek to formulate a simple rule: for every one new regulation, two old regulations would be eliminated. What counts as “one” regulation? I imagine that there’s quite a bit of diversity in the length and complexity of regulations. Couldn’t they just enact some big 200 page regulation and repeal two trivial things to go along (and then staple the same things onto the new one as pages 201 and 202)? ---
**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 7:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/46 "2016-11-24T19:40:33Z")
> [@Lord\_Feldon](#): > > What counts as “one” regulation? I imagine that there’s quite a bit of diversity in the length and complexity of regulations. Couldn’t they just enact some big 200 page regulation and repeal two trivial things to go along (and then staple the same things onto the new one as pages 201 and 202)? I fear the opposite effect would take place in this “Let’s free up business!” atmosphere-trivial regulations introduced for the purpose of eliminating major regs that business lobbyists find distasteful. ---
**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 7:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/47 "2016-11-24T19:53:25Z")
One of the first regulations to go, I figure, will be the one where bankers have to mention if a mortgage’s interest rate is scheduled to double every leap year. That’s a regulation, right? ---
**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 8:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/48 "2016-11-24T20:05:07Z")
> [@John\_Mace](#): > > Someone needs to buy Trump a copy of _Being the President Of the US for Dummies_. Checked the George W. Bush Presidential Library; he lost his copy on a bet over an arm wrestling match with Angela Merkel. Stranger ---
**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/49 "2016-11-24T20:07:28Z")
> [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](#): > > Checked the George W. Bush Presidential Library; he lost his copy on a bet over an arm wrestling match with Angela Merkel. Speaking of which, would it be an act of war if Trump got grabby with Merkel and Merkel, having decided she’d had enough of that crap, broke his nose? ---
**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/50 "2016-11-24T20:53:03Z")
I’m not sure what would happen when Trump’s Secret Service detail goes up against whatever Merkel’s German government equivalent is called. But I know to always bet on the Germans in the early stages of a conflict. They’re just too damn good at that. 😃 ---
**Author:** ![penultima\_thule](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/penultima_thule/32/3833_2.png) [@penultima\_thule](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/penultima_thule)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/51 "2016-11-24T22:03:58Z")
> [@GreenWyvern](#): > > When they realize that he can’t deliver on most of his promises - and he won’t be able to - they’ll probably tear him limb from limb… You have omitted the third effect; if he does deliver on his promises the demographic which elected him will wear most of the short term adverse effects and whatever benefits accrue will be both slow in coming and not necessarily to their advantage. ---
**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/52 "2016-11-24T23:01:34Z")
Overall I think the know-nothings have delivered the billionaire’s wet dream. What Trump will deliver is be a free-fire zone for the rich against the middle & lower classes. What Trump will talk about incessantly is how the quick fixes keep getting stymied by those mean Establishment pols, both D & R. and that pesky constitutional bullshit: [Court Says Police Need to Make Time for “This Constitutional Bullshit” – Lowering the Bar](http://loweringthebar.net/2016/11/court-says-police-have-to-make-time.html) Depending on the breaks of timing, this \*could \*deliver a solidly D congress in 2018 if the common folks get wise to the con _and_ the Ds play their hand perfectly. Far more likely the propaganda front holds long enough and it returns a wildly Trumpist congress in 2018 and they actually support some of his hare-brained headline grabbers. About then the professional bureaucracy folds its resistance too and that’s when life in Amerika gets surreal. ---
**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2016, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/53 "2016-11-24T23:49:54Z")
> [@LSLGuy](#): > > Overall I think the know-nothings have delivered the billionaire’s wet dream. > > What Trump will deliver is be a free-fire zone for the rich against the middle & lower classes. > > What Trump will talk about incessantly is how the quick fixes keep getting stymied by those mean Establishment pols, both D & R. and that pesky constitutional bullshit: [Court Says Police Need to Make Time for “This Constitutional Bullshit” – Lowering the Bar](http://loweringthebar.net/2016/11/court-says-police-have-to-make-time.html) > > Depending on the breaks of timing, this \*could \*deliver a solidly D congress in 2018 if the common folks get wise to the con _and_ the Ds play their hand perfectly. > > Far more likely the propaganda front holds long enough and it returns a wildly Trumpist congress in 2018 and they actually support some of his hare-brained headline grabbers. About then the professional bureaucracy folds its resistance too and that’s when life in Amerika gets surreal. I have to agree with your analysis. As the political system sinks into the abyss of ignorance and scapegoating, the question is whether there will be enough voters who realize it’s all been a con, who realize the incredible stupidity and mendacity of some of the idiots Trump has been appointing, or whether there will be a move towards the idea of “not enough Trumpists in charge, that’s the problem!”. I’m not sure if I’m quite as pessimistic yet as you are about how this will play out, but I do agree that those are the parameters. But then again, there’s the famous H.L. Mencken quote, “No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.” ---
**Author:** ![Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/13edae/32.png) [@Stranger\_On\_A\_Train](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stranger_On_A_Train)\ **Post date:** [November 25, 2016, 1:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735/54 "2016-11-25T01:09:53Z")
> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#): > > Speaking of which, would it be an act of war if Trump got grabby with Merkel and Merkel, having decided she’d had enough of that crap, broke his nose? It would be the entire developed world against the US, with Putin sitting on the sidelines egging Trump on. And I have 50€ on Merkel in a celebrity death match. “Thees ees how vee deal mit boolees in Der Vaterland, Herr Drumpf.” _crack_ Stranger [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-100-day-agenda/772735.md?page=2)