# The Trump Administration: A Clusterfuck in the Making Part Deux (Part 1)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 22, 2020, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083 "2020-06-22T03:36:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 244

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.winston_oboogie/32/2945_2.png) [@Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Winston_OBoogie)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4878 "2020-10-13T20:07:35Z")

</div>

> [@Akaj](#):
>
> > [@](#):
> >
> > The complaint says Wolkoff and Mrs. Trump in August 2017 sealed a “Gratuitous Services Agreement” related to “nonpublic, privileged and/or confidential information” that she might obtain during her service under the agreement.
> > 
> > “This was a contract with the United States and therefore enforceable by the United States,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec.

Unfortunately, if she was hired as an assistant by the First Lady and was paid by the United States government, then, yes, this NDA is with the United States, and would be enforceable by the DOJ.

Still a dick move.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4879 "2020-10-13T20:08:30Z")

</div>

> [@Aspenglow](#):
>
> Must be nice to have your own personal DOJ:
> 
> [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-melania/u-s-justice-department-accuses-melania-trump-book-author-of-breaking-nondisclosure-pact-idUSKBN26Y2VV?il=0](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-melania/u-s-justice-department-accuses-melania-trump-book-author-of-breaking-nondisclosure-pact-idUSKBN26Y2VV?il=0)
> 
> Fuck me, I hate these people.

Why the FUCK would the Justice Department involve themselves in a civil matter such as allegedly violating the terms of an NDA?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aspenglow](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aspenglow/32/76_2.png) [@Aspenglow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aspenglow)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4880 "2020-10-13T20:11:01Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](#):
>
> Unfortunately, if she was hired as an assistant by the First Lady and was paid by the United States government, then, yes, this NDA is with the United States, and would be enforceable by the DOJ.
> 
> Still a dick move.

Fair point. I think the whole question of NDAs on behalf of the federal government is one that should be resolved, though. No other administration had need of them, and the whole idea is contrary to the notion of _public_ service.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Akaj](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/akaj/32/145_2.png) [@Akaj](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Akaj)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4881 "2020-10-13T20:11:53Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](#):
>
> > [@Akaj](#):
> >
> > > [@](#):
> > >
> > > The complaint says Wolkoff and Mrs. Trump in August 2017 sealed a “Gratuitous Services Agreement” related to “nonpublic, privileged and/or confidential information” that she might obtain during her service under the agreement.
> > > 
> > > “This was a contract with the United States and therefore enforceable by the United States,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec.
> 
> Unfortunately, if she was hired as an assistant by the First Lady and was paid by the United States government, then, yes, this NDA is with the United States, and would be enforceable by the DOJ.
> 
> Still a dick move.

Hmmm … and knowing the Trumps, there’s no way they would have paid her out of pocket when they could get taxpayers to pay her instead. So, damn, the complaint is probably legit.

I’m not even sure it’s a dick move. If Michelle Obama’s government-paid personal assistant as FLOTUS wrote a tell-all in violation of an NDA, I’d expect DOJ to intervene.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aspenglow](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aspenglow/32/76_2.png) [@Aspenglow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aspenglow)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4882 "2020-10-13T20:19:38Z")

</div>

> [@Akaj](#):
>
> I’m not even sure it’s a dick move. If Michelle Obama’s government-paid personal assistant as FLOTUS wrote a tell-all in violation of an NDA, I’d expect DOJ to intervene.

The Obamas would never have asked anyone to sign an NDA, and they would never have committed conduct so egregious it would have garnered a tell-all. _Were_ there any tell-all books written for the Obama years? I’m not aware of any.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.winston_oboogie/32/2945_2.png) [@Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Winston_OBoogie)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4883 "2020-10-13T20:22:19Z")

</div>

> [@kaylasdad99](#):
>
> Why the FUCK would the Justice Department involve themselves in a civil matter such as allegedly violating the terms of an NDA?

I’ve signed several NDAs at work. Were I to break one of them (and profit from it), I would fully expect their lawyers to jump at me. Who are the Federal Government’s lawyers? The DOJ.

> [@Aspenglow](#):
>
> Fair point. I think the whole question of NDAs on behalf of the federal government is one that should be resolved, though. No other administration had need of them, and the whole idea is contrary to the notion of _public_ service.

I disagree. As a matter of fact, I would think that governmental processes would involve MORE need for NDAs. OK, for a possible joint venture, I signed an NDA that I wouldn’t reveal the other company’s financial information. Didn’t see a damned thing in there that was way different from what we suspected. Pretty much useless. Now, if Wolkoff had witnessed Donald on the phone with McConnell, the results of that phone conversation could have great consequences.

Still a dick move. Haven’t read the book or (really) any of the links here. Did she actually reveal anything of national importance, other than Melonia calling Christmas “bullshit”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Akaj](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/akaj/32/145_2.png) [@Akaj](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Akaj)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4884 "2020-10-13T20:24:15Z")

</div>

> [@Aspenglow](#):
>
> > [@Akaj](#):
> >
> > I’m not even sure it’s a dick move. If Michelle Obama’s government-paid personal assistant as FLOTUS wrote a tell-all in violation of an NDA, I’d expect DOJ to intervene.
> 
> The Obamas would never have asked anyone to sign an NDA, and they would never have committed conduct so egregious it would have garnered a tell-all. _Were_ there any tell-all books written for the Obama years? I’m not aware of any.

Well, yeah, of course all that’s true.

But, off-topic … are NDAs really so obnoxious? They’re pretty common in lots of fairly mundane business situations. I’m in marketing and my agency has one with virtually every client.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Folacin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/folacin/32/3195_2.png) [@Folacin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Folacin)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4885 "2020-10-13T20:28:47Z")

</div>

> [@Akaj](#):
>
> But, off-topic … are NDAs really so obnoxious?

For protecting trade, business, or national security issues? No.

Because you or your spouse are terrible people and you don’t want anyone to know? Maybe still not obnoxious, but you could try and not be a terrible person. Or at least treat the people who might write a tell-all well enough that they aren’t tempted to spill the beans on you (but then you wouldn’t be a terrible person, possibly).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aspenglow](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aspenglow/32/76_2.png) [@Aspenglow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aspenglow)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4886 "2020-10-13T20:35:45Z")

</div>

Bingarooni. In business, NDAs absolutely have their place. In government, accountability to the public is a top issue.

So far as I know, the woman held no security clearances and divulged no items of concern to national security. She basically shared inside information about the True, Unscripted Melania.

And maybe we should hold ourselves accountable, too, to only elect people we can discern are upstanding, ethical and decent. The Trumps were a known ugly quantity that didn’t uphold these ideals long before 2016. WTF is wrong with Americans who viewed these people as a reasonable choice for leadership?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4887 "2020-10-13T20:37:11Z")

</div>

The publisher signed onto this knowing they were going to incur legal costs, I’m sure.

Get everyone you know out there to vote. Just… end this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mollie\_Magill](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mollie_magill/32/20882_2.png) [@Mollie\_Magill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mollie_Magill)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4888 "2020-10-13T20:39:43Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Winston\_OBoogie](#):
>
> > [@kaylasdad99](#):
> >
> > Why the FUCK would the Justice Department involve themselves in a civil matter such as allegedly violating the terms of an NDA?
> 
> I’ve signed several NDAs at work. Were I to break one of them (and profit from it), I would fully expect their lawyers to jump at me. Who are the Federal Government’s lawyers? The DOJ.
> 
> > [@Aspenglow](#):
> >
> > Fair point. I think the whole question of NDAs on behalf of the federal government is one that should be resolved, though. No other administration had need of them, and the whole idea is contrary to the notion of _public_ service.
> 
> I disagree. As a matter of fact, I would think that governmental processes would involve MORE need for NDAs. OK, for a possible joint venture, I signed an NDA that I wouldn’t reveal the other company’s financial information. Didn’t see a damned thing in there that was way different from what we suspected. Pretty much useless. Now, if Wolkoff had witnessed Donald on the phone with McConnell, the results of that phone conversation could have great consequences.

Isn’t that why we have security clearances?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BippityBoppityBoo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bippityboppityboo/32/5745_2.png) [@BippityBoppityBoo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BippityBoppityBoo)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4889 "2020-10-13T20:41:57Z")

</div>

> [@JohnT](#):
>
> Get everyone you know out there to vote. Just… end this.

Voted last week, second day early in-person was open, at the election commission. Made the middle schooler I had just picked up come along and watch so she know how to register and vote when her time came to do the right thing. Took her out for ice cream afterwards to cement the positive association in her quite gifted mind.

Any excuse for ice cream.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4890 "2020-10-13T20:57:53Z")

</div>

My mother took me along with her to vote all the time, to instill the same type of civic responsibility.

I wonder if she would have if she knew that I would grow up to cancel out her vote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knowed\_Out](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/knowed_out/32/7380_2.png) [@Knowed\_Out](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knowed_Out)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4891 "2020-10-13T20:58:33Z")

</div>

You win the thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikecurtis](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mikecurtis/32/3284_2.png) [@mikecurtis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mikecurtis)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4892 "2020-10-13T21:05:52Z")

</div>

> [@Akaj](#):
>
> …are NDAs really so obnoxious?

Yes…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aspenglow](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aspenglow/32/76_2.png) [@Aspenglow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aspenglow)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 9:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4893 "2020-10-13T21:06:05Z")

</div>

In other news, SCOTUS is wasting no time putting their thumb on the scale of democracy:

> **[U.S. Supreme Court allows Trump to wind down census early](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-census/u-s-supreme-court-allows-trump-to-wind-down-census-early-idUSKBN26Y308?il=0)**
>
> The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed President Donald Trump's administration to wind down population counting for the 2020 U.S. census earlier than planned, in a blow to civil rights groups concerned about an undercount, particularly of racial...

And more:

> **[U.S. Supreme Court ends Democratic lawmakers' anti-graft lawsuit against Trump](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-emoluments/u-s-supreme-court-ends-democratic-lawmakers-anti-graft-lawsuit-against-trump-idUSKBN26Y1ZW)**
>
> The Supreme Court on Tuesday put an end to a lawsuit brought by congressional Democrats that accused President Donald Trump of violating anti-corruption provisions in the U.S. Constitution with his business dealings.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ann\_Hedonia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ann_hedonia/32/319_2.png) [@Ann\_Hedonia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ann_Hedonia)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 9:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4894 "2020-10-13T21:08:05Z")

</div>

I dunno. I read her book -she was Melania’s Michael Cohen and she got played good - that 26 million everyone talks about was paid into an account that Trump cronies Rick Gates and Tom Barrack set up in her name - and she agreed to it - but she wasn’t a signatory and had no control over the account, not even an ability to view it. She claims her NDA’s prevented her from telling her side of the story.

She’s just another Trumped up moron, really. But that thing with the DOJ is interesting. Stephanie Winston Wolkoff (SWW) kind of appointed herself to fill the vacuum created by Melania not giving a fuck about anything, and set about interviewing staff and recommending candidates for the First Lady staff positions. She envisioned herself as Melania’s chief strategist, the liaison between Melania’s chief of staff and Melania -everything needs to go through me-.

But this wasn’t a job that existed in reality. She held the staff interviews off premises, in her own hotel - and paid all her own expenses. Melania rubber-stamped everyone she recommended because Melania didn’t give a fuck about anything. But Melania really didn’t do anything in the service of formalizing SWW’s position either because Melania is completely and utterly indifferent to everything.

So after months of pushing, SWW got her Gratuitous Service Agreement, which allowed her work for free. Not in January 2017 though, it took several months. But, IIRC, it didn’t clarify her position or give her any of the titles she wanted, just the titles of “advisor” and “friend”.

The agreement was canceled a few months later as she was being scapegoated in the inaugural scandal.

But this might be a legal problem for the DOJ. Now IANAL, but even though IANAL I watch enough TV to know that a contract doesn’t count unless something in it both parties, and I’m not sure that there was anything in it for SWW. No money, that’s for sure. She didn’t get the titles she wanted. I guess it solidified her status as Melania’s “friend”. But I don’t think that wpukd legally qualify as consideration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carrps](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carrps/32/2957_2.png) [@carrps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carrps)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4895 "2020-10-13T21:14:19Z")

</div>

> [@Robot\_Arm](#):
>
> I was expecting a link to [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qDy4OMAkgY).

I **loved** that show. Cheesy goodness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bengangmo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@bengangmo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bengangmo)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 10:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4896 "2020-10-13T22:34:17Z")

</div>

Is NDA with “the govt” really a thing?  
Wouldn’t it be covered under national security rather than anything else?  
For things like policy announcements I could see it - but again, that would / should be covered under different rules.  
If there is a violation of privacy - that would be criminal rather than civil wouldn’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skypist](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skypist/32/169_2.png) [@Skypist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skypist)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2020, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083/4897 "2020-10-13T22:45:04Z")

</div>

If the government-paid assistant revealed personal info about the Trumps, I don’t see why that would or should be covered by the DOJ. And if the assistant revealed potentially classified info then that should be covered by the laws and “norms” already in place with possible DOJ involvement, no NDA needed.

It makes me really uncomfortable to think that government employees are signing NDA contracts with the Trumps because that would be a private, non-government contract between them and a government employee.

I get it if they don’t want info about an affair or something outrageous they said in private to come out, but you don’t just fall into the presidency either. If they wanted their employees to sign NDA contracts then they shouldn’t have sought out a high profile government position.

I am not a lawyer so this is just my ignorant opinion.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083.md?page=243)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-administration-a-clusterfuck-in-the-making-part-deux-part-1/911083.md?page=245)
