# The Trump Impeachment Inquiry

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [September 24, 2019, 8:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771 "2019-09-24T20:23:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 308

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![guizot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guizot/32/3636_2.png) [@guizot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/guizot)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 3:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6141 "2019-12-13T15:43:14Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> Fucking Gohmert had to ask how his vote was recorded just to make sure.

Everything’s complicated for the simple-minded.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6142 "2019-12-13T15:44:54Z")

</div>

> [@What\_the](#):
>
> On a scale of 1-10, how much do you hate him?

325

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![QuickSilver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quicksilver/32/7832_2.png) [@QuickSilver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/QuickSilver)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6143 "2019-12-13T15:45:41Z")

</div>

> [@BobLibDem](#):
>
> Fucking Gohmert had to ask how his vote was recorded just to make sure.

Well, Goooolly Mr. Trump, sir! I just love you soooo much, I wanted to vote “NO” twice.

…Toadying maggot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 3:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6144 "2019-12-13T15:49:01Z")

</div>

> [@Bijou\_Drains](#):
>
> Dems should get this over as soon as possible since everyone knows the outcome.

I’ll be over it Wednesday, if the House Democrats do right by the history books.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_L.A](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_l.a/32/1084_2.png) [@Johnny\_L.A](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_L.A)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 4:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6145 "2019-12-13T16:07:05Z")

</div>

> [@bobot](#):
>
> I’ll be over it Wednesday, if the House Democrats do right by the history books.

Well, the committee voted to impeach. Next week the House will vote to impeach. Then it goes to the Senate. The Senate will vote to acquit.

Then we will hear **THE WITCH HUNT IS OVER! TOTAL EXONERATION! LOCK UP THE DEMS! I SHOULD BE PRESIDENT FOR LIFE!**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6146 "2019-12-13T16:10:01Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny\_L.A](#):
>
> Then we will hear **THE WITCH HUNT IS OVER! TOTAL EXONERATION! LOCK UP THE DEMS! I SHOULD BE PRESIDENT FOR LIFE!**

For some reason I can only hear that as Trevor Noah’s Trump voice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6147 "2019-12-13T16:36:37Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny\_L.A](#):
>
> Well, the committee voted to impeach. Next week the House will vote to impeach. Then it goes to the Senate. The Senate will vote to acquit.
> 
> Then we will hear **THE WITCH HUNT IS OVER! TOTAL EXONERATION! LOCK UP THE DEMS! I SHOULD BE PRESIDENT FOR LIFE!**

That’s true, but 200 years from now schoolkids will learn that today’s Americans were not in lockstep with the con. It’s something.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sciurophobic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cab0a1/32.png) [@sciurophobic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sciurophobic)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6148 "2019-12-13T17:02:34Z")

</div>

What the Democrats need most of all is an impeachment manager capable of giving a closing argument that is so clear and eloquent that even when the Senate acquits the American public will know the truth. Who is up to the challenge? Schiff showed he can argue the case, but he’s not that exciting. I’m thinking former prosecutor Eric Swalwell. In his questioning he’s shown a clear ability to expose Trump’s misdeeds and knock down White House and Republican arguments.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThelmaLou](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thelmalou/32/390_2.png) [@ThelmaLou](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThelmaLou)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6149 "2019-12-13T17:15:33Z")

</div>

No surprise here, but jeez… :smack:

> [@](#):
>
> As soon as the House votes to impeach President Trump — which is likely to happen next week — it is no longer in charge of the process. The situation then goes over to the Republican-controlled Senate, where Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. will preside but the GOP otherwise can control much of the length and substance of the process.
> 
> **And Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is indicating he’ll endeavor to give the White House whatever kind of trial it wants.**
> 
> Appearing on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show on Thursday night, McConnell made a point of saying that he would be coordinating with White House counsel Pat Cipollone every step of the way.
> 
> “Everything I do during this, I’m coordinating with the White House counsel,” McConnell said. “There will be no difference between the president’s position and our position as to how to handle this to the extent that we can.”  
> …

Source: [WaPo](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/12/13/mcconnell-says-hell-let-trumps-white-house-dictate-trumps-impeachment-trial/)

“Whatever kind of trial it wants.” So… MAGA hats for all the Senators? Scantily-clad vixens to pass out refreshments? An applause-track? Bells, whistles, and sound effects? Why not just hold the hearing on the floor of a sports arena and open the stands to screaming Trumpniks?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6150 "2019-12-13T17:18:21Z")

</div>

At this point, I am thinking about how in the history books it would read -

“While the house voted to impeach the president for his conduct, it did not send the articles to the senate for trial - due to the overwhelming reports by the Senate republicans that they had already decided the outcome and were directly coordinating with the executive branch on how to insure said outcome”.

this would leave Trump impeached - but not convicted OR acquitted.

nothing changes his being impeached - but it takes away any reality for him to say “he was aquitted”. He’ll of course say it anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6151 "2019-12-13T17:29:39Z")

</div>

It would most likely be in Trump’s interests to either:

1. Order McConnell to make the Senate trial as speedy as possible (since he apparently can order Mitch around);

2. Use the Senate trial as his chance to subpoena Pelosi or Biden or whoever else he wants to subpoena, assuming he or Barr can do that, for whatever purpose he wants.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6152 "2019-12-13T17:34:43Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> Do I have this straight? Last night, the Demos had intended to pass articles of impeachment out of committee. But the Republicans effectively filibustered, proposing motion after stupid motion, babbling on and on about irrelevant subjects, just so that the committee vote would be too late for the news cycle.
> 
> So about midnight the Demos decided to postpone the vote until the next morning. And now the Repubs accuse the Demos of gamesmanship! :smack:

Easy response: Republicans want to hide their votes in the middle of the night; Democrats want everyone to see how they vote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bijou\_Drains](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bijou_drains/32/2814_2.png) [@Bijou\_Drains](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bijou_Drains)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6153 "2019-12-13T17:44:11Z")

</div>

and unless things change a lot between now and November 2020 the history books will also say Trump was a 2 term president. I don’t see any Dem beating him, certainly not Biden.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6154 "2019-12-13T17:49:50Z")

</div>

Trump didn’t win the electoral college by a whole lotta votes, you know. Things have to change a little.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bijou\_Drains](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bijou_drains/32/2814_2.png) [@Bijou\_Drains](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bijou_Drains)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6155 "2019-12-13T17:54:39Z")

</div>

the only way Trump loses is if the Dems have a much higher turnout than 2016. This impeachment is going to give Trump a bigger turnout of his base. It’s great for him to get people ticked off and vote for him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6156 "2019-12-13T17:57:48Z")

</div>

I would bet that Trump’s vote is maxxed out, where it was in 2016, and that the Democrats could do better. Time will tell, certainly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fiddle\_Peghead](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fiddle_peghead/32/3506_2.png) [@Fiddle\_Peghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fiddle_Peghead)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 5:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6157 "2019-12-13T17:59:13Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> There’s also the theory that the House should vote, but should delay sending the Articles to the Senate–perhaps until all witnesses called (Mulvaney, Pompeo, Bolton etc.) actually testify:  
> [http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=22013011&postcount=5966](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=22013011&postcount=5966)

I like the John Dean idea that it would take away Trump’s ability to crow about acquittal. However, if you saw Doug Collins’ phony rant last night, about how this all must be about politics since Nadler (gasp!) postponed the vote until this morning, if they do this Collins and the rest will have a real reason to support this idea. So on, balance, I’m against that. Also, I don’t see how the Dems make the case that they can open the hearings up again if Mulvaney, etc do eventually agree to or are compelled to testify. No, I’m afraid they lost their chance to hear from the others when they rushed through the whole thing. But I do expect the Dems to continue oversight, so hopefully we will hear from that despicable crew at some point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 6:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6158 "2019-12-13T18:05:03Z")

</div>

> [@bobot](#):
>
> I would bet that Trump’s vote is maxxed out, where it was in 2016, and that the Democrats could do better. Time will tell, certainly.

The UK election results scare me a little in terms of how the presidential election might go next year. From what I’ve read, the majority of Brits would prefer to remain in the EU but they elected by a big majority the people who want to see it exit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fiddle\_Peghead](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fiddle_peghead/32/3506_2.png) [@Fiddle\_Peghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fiddle_Peghead)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6159 "2019-12-13T18:14:11Z")

</div>

> [@drad\_dog](#):
>
> MSNBC came into existence to counter the bias and propaganda on Fox. And they aren’t even countering it with bias. They are countering it with pretty fair readings on most things, …

I’d agree that they have fair readings that in and of themselves often, but not always, are bias-free.

> [@](#):
>
> …with a lot of both sides stuff. Many people even think they are becoming republican. Any framing that ignores this is bats.

I’ve been watching MSNBC since its inception, and I am damn glad it exists to counterbalance Fox News and the like. But they engage in propaganda of their own. This doesn’t even scratch the surface, but how many times a night do you see a full-on debate between two politicians from both sides of the aisle? Oh, they have Republicans on all the time, but not those who are willing to _defend_ Republicans. People like Bill Kristol and Steve Schmidt, who are willing to call out Trump and Company for what they are. One might make the argument that there is no defense of the Republican party as it exists today, and for the most part, I would be one of them. But if you cut politicians out entirely, that leaves the people on MSNBC’s shows free reign to _say whatever they please_, knowing that there will be no one there to rebut them.

The point is, nothing is truly “both sides” when you have politicians (as opposed to just pundits) from only one of those sides.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![drad\_dog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/aeb1de/32.png) [@drad\_dog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/drad_dog)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 6:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771/6160 "2019-12-13T18:47:58Z")

</div>

> [@Fiddle\_Peghead](#):
>
> I’d agree that they have fair readings that in and of themselves often, but not always, are bias-free.
> 
> I’ve been watching MSNBC since its inception, and I am damn glad it exists to counterbalance Fox News and the like. But they engage in propaganda of their own. This doesn’t even scratch the surface, but how many times a night do you see a full-on debate between two politicians from both sides of the aisle? Oh, they have Republicans on all the time, but not those who are willing to _defend_ Republicans. People like Bill Kristol and Steve Schmidt, who are willing to call out Trump and Company for what they are. One might make the argument that there is no defense of the Republican party as it exists today, and for the most part, I would be one of them. But if you cut politicians out entirely, that leaves the people on MSNBC’s shows free reign to _say whatever they please_, knowing that there will be no one there to rebut them.
> 
> The point is, nothing is truly “both sides” when you have politicians (as opposed to just pundits) from only one of those sides.

I won’t hold MSNBC responsible for a failure to have intelligent worthy republicans on defending the potus. You seem to imply they don’t want to have them on. The hosts I see would give up a finger to have them on for real answers. But they are trolling. How do you deal with trolls? Trolling is a big deal here, right? So we all have that in common here. Why is MSNBC biased for being in the position of having to defend itself from trolls? DO you watch CNN? They have had a troll problem by trying to accomodate bad actors and liars.

“Bias” to me is stealthy, obscure, and disingenuous. I don’t see it in MSNBC. There is a lot of it around for good comparative examples too.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771.md?page=307)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-trump-impeachment-inquiry/840771.md?page=309)
