# "the whole 9 yards revisited" **URL:** \ **Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\ **Created:** [May 12, 2001, 1:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154 "2001-05-12T01:20:11Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![RubberEntropy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/91b2a8/32.png) [@RubberEntropy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RubberEntropy)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 1:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/1 "2001-05-12T01:20:11Z")
Hi all, I’ve just been looking at an old discussion on the origin of the expression “the whole 9 yards”. Various explanations have been offered, none of which I find convincing. I hereby offer another for peer review. The “whole 9 yards” refers to the standard 27foot 50cal ammunition belt used in USAF WWII fighter aircraft. Usage may have originally been along the lines of " I lined him up and gave him the whole nine yards". Now shoot me down. ---
**Author:** ![Arnold\_Winkelried](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Arnold\_Winkelried](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Arnold_Winkelried)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 1:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/2 "2001-05-12T01:35:20Z")
Welcome to the SDMB, and thank you for posting your comment. Please include a link to Cecil’s column if it’s on the straight dope web site. To include a link, it can be as simple as including the web page location in your post (make sure there is a space **before** and **after** the text of the URL). Cecil’s column can be found on-line at this link: [What’s the origin of “the whole nine yards”?](http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_252.html) The column ( **including** Slug Signorino’s illustration) can also be found on pages 252-257 of Cecil Adams’ book «[_More of the Straight Dope_](http://www.straightdope.com/otheroutlets/books.html)». * * * moderator, «[**Comments on Cecil’s Columns**](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/forumdisplay.php?forumid=1)» [Edited by Arnold Winkelried on 05-11-2001 at 08:37 PM] ---
**Author:** ![Arnold\_Winkelried](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Arnold\_Winkelried](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Arnold_Winkelried)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 1:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/3 "2001-05-12T01:38:30Z")
Yet another thread to add to my collection! Previous discussions on the subject (most recent first): [The whole nine yards](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=63008) [The Whole Nine Yards](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=50725) [The whole 9 yards…](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=29921) [The whole nine yards](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=2905) [the whole nine yards](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=1734) [yards, and nine of them …](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=1379) [The Whole Nine Yards Explanation](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=573) ---
**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/4 "2001-05-12T01:44:26Z")
**rubber** Just in case you are overwhelmed by Arnold’s links, all anyone requires is that you provide us with a cite in print. That shouldn’t be so hard, should it? Bang, Bang! ---
**Author:** ![Arnold\_Winkelried](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Arnold\_Winkelried](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Arnold_Winkelried)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 1:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/5 "2001-05-12T01:46:41Z")
Finally, if we look at the oldest thread in my list above (the one at the bottom), we can see the wise words of noted SDMB sages and WorldWar II cognoscenti tomndebb and warriner, which I will take the liberty of reposting here: **tomndebb** says > [@](#): > > 9 yards is 324 inches. The waist gunners of U.S. bombers were always armed with .50 caliber weapons (excepting a few Catalinas and a few modified YB-40’s). They were routinely provided 1,000 rounds of ammo. 1,000 time 1/2 inch (ignoring the extra width for the casing and the links or earlier webs) is 500 inches–rather more than 324. > > The implied phrase (that you did not exactly use, but that we have seen frequently) that shooting at a specific enemy resulted in “giving him the whole nine yards” would never have been uttered by any gunner who did not want to be reamed thoroughly by the rest of the crew: shooting your entire load at a single plane is wasteful and a sign of really bad shooting skills. **warriner** replies > [@](#): > > Really? Everything I have found says that the waist gunners of the B-17 had 400 rounds. See the specs here for the B-17E: [http://www.fscwv.edu/users/rheffner/b17/b1708.html](http://www.fscwv.edu/users/rheffner/b17/b1708.html) > > I don’t think the 400 rounds was in a continous belt either. … > > Beside the magazines attached to the guns themselves you can see three other cases of ammunition which I assume are reloads for the guns. The boxes are labelled as .50 cal but the capacity is difficult to read. It looks like 200 something to me. > > In any event, no bomber gunner would get the chance to empty an entire belt at a fighter. At best they could count on a snap shots of a second or two. ---
**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 2:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/6 "2001-05-12T02:21:35Z")
Since we are into it, here’s my take on what is one of the **top 10 mysteries** in etymology. The phrase first is cited in print in 1966 in _Doom Pussy_, a book by war correspondent Elaine Shepard. Everyone seems to sidestep the source. She wrote a book about air operations by the US over North Vietnam, which, in most opinions, was mostly fictional. But she obviously(to me) got the phrase from the pilots who were part of this operation. Given that most WWII slang is **extremely available in print** , it is almost positive that this phrase came from our pilots in early VietNam action. Just exactly where they got it is open to conjecture. But it is almost a certainty that they didn’t hear it from their WWII parents. Remember, just find that cite in print. Prior to 1966. ---
**Author:** ![Booker57](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Booker57](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Booker57)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 2:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/7 "2001-05-12T02:33:34Z")
\ Old sailing ships had yard arms, if a ship had 9. I am wondering just what they are, what they did? \ Bad grammer, syntax sorry. ---
**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 2:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/8 "2001-05-12T02:42:43Z")
Repeating: Find that phrase in print prior to 1966. You’ll be a hero! ---
**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 5:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/9 "2001-05-12T05:20:55Z")
I’m going to rent _Flying Tigers_(1942), because I could have sworn I heard John Wayne utter the line in it. ---
**Author:** ![RubberEntropy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/91b2a8/32.png) [@RubberEntropy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RubberEntropy)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 5:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/10 "2001-05-12T05:23:41Z")
I hadn’t realised that this subject was so regularly revisited ! I am particularly unconvinced by the Vietnam origin idea as I served there myself, and have no recollection of the phrase being used in any special contemporary context. I will admit that the passage of time may have blurred recollection, but I am fairly sure I had heard the phrase in use during my youth in the late 50’s and 60’s before my military service. The B17 ammo belt idea is a variation on my original post. I believe that if the phrase is descriptive of WWII ammunition it is for fighter aircraft like the P51 and P47, not bombers, the maximum length of the belt being dictated by the capacity of the ammunition bay in the wing. Final comment, ammunition belts can be joined together with a simple clip so the total ammunition carried in a B17 would have no bearing on the original issue length of an individual belt. ---
**Author:** ![Rube\_E.Tewesday](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f0a364/32.png) [@Rube\_E.Tewesday](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rube_E.Tewesday)\ **Post date:** [May 12, 2001, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/11 "2001-05-12T18:00:29Z")
I agree with Samclem’s dubiousness about a WWII origin, given how many books were written at the time, and how much genuine slang was recorded in them. Also, in my experience, there are still lots of WWII vets around, many of whom amuse themselves on the Internet. I don’t ever recall in any of these discussions (and admittedly, I haven’t revisited all of the zillions of threads)an instance of one of those vets coming forward to say “Oh yeah, I flew P-47s when I was a kid, and we used the expression when we’d used up all our ammo.” For what it’s worth (not much), I don’t recall hearing the expression before the 80’s, then all of a sudden, it seemed like I was hearing it all the time. Whenever it originated, it seems to me that it had a long subterranean period, then took off. Seeing how difficult it is to answer this question gives a little bit of insight into why there are so many unanswered questions and exploded theories in history. ---
**Author:** ![RubberEntropy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/91b2a8/32.png) [@RubberEntropy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RubberEntropy)\ **Post date:** [May 13, 2001, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/12 "2001-05-13T04:04:04Z")
Here is what could be a definitive answer. The quoted gentleman first heard it in the Korean war from ex WWII pilots. I quote one Frank Pierce : “I know it authoritatively, having served in the military. I first heard it during the Korean War from Navy pilots who flew F6F Hellcats in the Pacific Theater. The standard ammo belt for the fixed fifty-caliber machine guns used on fighter aircraft were, when loaded, 27 feet in length, or of course, nine yards. When you met a Jap at 10,000 feet and really spashed him, you gave him the “whole nine yards” of belt ammo. It was common bragging.” If anyone wants to ask him more his email is, [fpierce@erols.com](mailto:fpierce@erols.com) ---
**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\ **Post date:** [May 13, 2001, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/13 "2001-05-13T04:42:53Z")
Not unless he has something dated from that period that contains that phrase. ---
**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\ **Post date:** [May 13, 2001, 4:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/14 "2001-05-13T04:51:04Z")
I’m sure that Frank Pierce is a nice person. He even published a book about his recollections of WWII as a kid in Maryland. I have no doubt that he served in Korea. But if “it was common bragging” that you gave a “Jap” the whole nine yards, it would have been available in print before 1966. Military slang gets put into print in this century faster and is more available than any other source of slang. And a generation of flyers from Korea would have memories of it being a common expression. But, as far as I know, they don’t. Just Frank. ---
**Author:** ![Rocket](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e79b87/32.png) [@Rocket](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rocket)\ **Post date:** [May 14, 2001, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/15 "2001-05-14T17:12:11Z")
Here we go again. I propose that we just take a vote, and whichever of the explanations forwarded so far wins will be decreed as the actual explanation, and written into the history books just like it was always there. I think the ammo belts are in the lead, with sails right behind and kilt/suit cloth bringing up the rear (pun intended). If you look at the first link in Arnold’s list, we have a promising lead. We need someone who is an expert in mid-1800’s English history or Disraeli to help narrow the search for documented proof. Hoping bwanasimba’s new little one has arrived and is healthy and happy. ---
**Author:** ![Apollyon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/apollyon/32/4238_2.png) [@Apollyon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Apollyon)\ **Post date:** [May 16, 2001, 4:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/16 "2001-05-16T04:49:46Z")
> [@](#): > > \*Originally posted by Rocket \* > **I think the ammo belts are in the lead, with sails right behind and kilt/suit cloth bringing up the rear (pun intended).** Ohh… I don’t think we can neglect concrete mixers – they do seem to be oft cited as the origin of the phrase. 🙂 A quick web search turned up this page, the [alt.quotations FAQ](http://www.mindspring.com/~samhobbs/alt-quotations/quotations.html#wholenineyards), which has a nice list of 31 things that the whole nine yards isn’t. Perhaps this could be used as the list of vote-able meanings. ---
**Author:** ![Irishman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/b487fb/32.png) [@Irishman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Irishman)\ **Post date:** [May 16, 2001, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/17 "2001-05-16T15:28:52Z")
I had a couple of guys last week assure me it most definitely came from WWII ammo belts. What am I supposed to say to that? _shrug_ ---
**Author:** ![Rube\_E.Tewesday](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f0a364/32.png) [@Rube\_E.Tewesday](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rube_E.Tewesday)\ **Post date:** [May 16, 2001, 9:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/18 "2001-05-16T21:36:49Z")
Irishman, I’d ask them what branch of the military they fought in. I come back to the point I made before – why don’t I ever see this slang attested to by WWII vets? Why is it always someone who heard it from a vet, or who heard it from someone who heard it from a vet? ---
**Author:** ![RubberEntropy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/91b2a8/32.png) [@RubberEntropy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RubberEntropy)\ **Post date:** [May 17, 2001, 2:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/19 "2001-05-17T02:36:03Z")
I have done a little research with the Imperial War Museum in England and the Australian National War Memorial (I am in Australia, and obviously have no life !). Neither can shed any light on the expression, but I have established the following with absolute veracity. The P51 was armed with six 50cal Brownings, mounted in the wings. These six guns were identical in all respects but one. The inboard gun on each wing was designated ‘primary’ and the outer pair ‘secondary’ the difference being the quantity of ammunition carried for each gun. Due to the tapered wing reducing in thickness from root to tip the ammunition bays for the outer guns were smaller in capacity. The primary bay contained 400 rounds, the outer or secondary bays 270 rounds each. The rate-of-fire was 12 rounds per/sec, giving a duration for each gun of 33.3 secs (primary) and 22.5 secs (secondary) before all ammunition was exhausted. I could not get a definitive answer as to belt length but, assuming no space at all between rounds, we have a primary belt length of 200 inches or 16.5 feet. If we allow half a diameter between rounds we get about 8.3 additional feet, a total of about 25 feet. I can be seen that it only requires a small adjustment of the assumed inter-round spacing to arrive at ahem, 27 feet or 9 yards. I have no personal experience of 50 cal ammunition belts, I do however have more experience than I would really have liked with 7.62mm ammunition belts. By my (admittedly time dimmed) recollection, an assumption of approximately half a diameter between rounds is not unreasonable. I therefore conclude that, while not constituting proof of any kind, the above facts do not disprove the “ammo belt theory” as the origin of “the whole nine yards”. One final thought, it seems that a P51 pilot in combat would be down to just two guns after only 22.5 seconds of fire. Beyond that point he would require three times the fire duration to do the same amount of damage. I for one can see why he might feel the need to go “the whole nine yards”. ---
**Author:** ![RubberEntropy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/91b2a8/32.png) [@RubberEntropy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RubberEntropy)\ **Post date:** [May 17, 2001, 5:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154/20 "2001-05-17T05:00:54Z")
In my last post I referred to the “inter-round spacing”. By this term I refer to the distance between parallel lines drawn through the longitudinal centres of two adjacent rounds. This distance is dictated by two factors. 1. Maximum diameter of the cartridge case. Always greater than the round itself, and in the case of the M8 50cal round used in WWII, significantly greater due to the ‘necked down’ design of the cartridge case. 2. The gap between two adjacent cartridge cases. The Browning 50cal gun utilised a ‘disintegrating belt’ based on metal clips between each round that flew apart as the round was chambered. This clip dictated a small gap between rounds. New information - The following link is to a photograph of a WWII armorer carrying 50cal ammunition belts. Note the spacing between rounds, looks about half a round diameter/ per round to me. Also note that the individual belts are much shorter than 27feet, this is NOT significant since disintegrating type belts are joined in seconds with a spring clip until the desired length is achieved. This length being dictated by the capacity of the ammunition bay or box. It makes sense that this joining take place as the belts are loaded into the aircraft, not before. Twenty seven feet of 50cal would be difficult to handle and VERY heavy indeed. [http://www.usni.org/hrp/images/thumbnails/WWII\_Color/0000008b.htm](http://www.usni.org/hrp/images/thumbnails/WWII_Color/0000008b.htm) [Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/the-whole-9-yards-revisited/65154.md?page=2)