# "There is no God" is an opinion, not a fact.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [January 9, 2005, 8:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925 "2005-01-09T20:28:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/21 "2005-01-09T21:19:32Z")

</div>

> [@Otto](#):
>
> Not to speak for **gobear** who is more than capable of speaking for himself, but the fact that someone’s belief in a diety is “fundamental” or “deep-set” has fuck-all to do with anything. Something doesn’t become true just because someone believes it _really really hard_.

What’s that? You say that no matter how hard somebody believes something, that doesn’t make it true? Well hell, then maybe we should stop trying to shove our beliefs down people’s throats and let them live their lives.

This thread isn’t about whether or not God exists. It’s about respecting threads that take that existance as a given for the purpose of discussion. There’s absolutely no reason to go shitting all over such threads. If an athiest sees such a thread, he should take a deep breath, count to 10, and go onto something else. That’s all. And if you’ve never shitted all over a thread like that, then thank you.

Really, I’ve got no beef with what you believe or how you act. It’d be nice if y’all could show me the same courtesy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Metacom](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ecae2f/32.png) [@Metacom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Metacom)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/22 "2005-01-09T21:23:18Z")

</div>

Regardless of whether you do or do not believe in God (or any shade of belief in between), can you at least agree that it’s rude to go in to a thread whose premise requires some sort of belief and then hijack it by categorically asserting the contrary?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gobear](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/8dc957/32.png) [@gobear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gobear)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/23 "2005-01-09T21:25:02Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny Bravo](#):
>
> What’s that? You say that no matter how hard somebody believes something, that doesn’t make it true? Well hell, then maybe we should stop trying to shove our beliefs down people’s throats and let them live their lives.
> 
> This thread isn’t about whether or not God exists. It’s about respecting threads that take that existance as a given for the purpose of discussion. There’s absolutely no reason to go shitting all over such threads. If an athiest sees such a thread, he should take a deep breath, count to 10, and go onto something else. That’s all. And if you’ve never shitted all over a thread like that, then thank you.
> 
> Really, I’ve got no beef with what you believe or how you act. It’d be nice if y’all could show me the same courtesy.

Sorry, but you’re a liar. I didn’t shit in your god thread because I don’t intrude in clubby type threads, anymore than I would if you were discussing Star Trek or Barbie dresses. I responded in this thread because it was a direct challenge to atheists to shut up, and you called me “intolerant” for saying what I believed and for bweing less-than-reverent to theism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/24 "2005-01-09T21:28:10Z")

</div>

> [@gobear](#):
>
> Sorry, but you’re a liar.

Eh, what?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iampunha](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/74df32/32.png) [@iampunha](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iampunha)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/25 "2005-01-09T21:30:11Z")

</div>

> [@Metacom](#):
>
> Regardless of whether you do or do not believe in God (or any shade of belief in between), can you at least agree that it’s rude to go in to a thread whose premise requires some sort of belief and then hijack it by categorically asserting the contrary?

I’d say it’s also rude to go into a thread like “So who here’s an atheist” and say “God exists. That’s all there is to it.” If it isn’t a debate thread, why bother starting shit in it? It isn’t like folks are discussing their favorite Beatles album or something similarly mundane.

(Your post quoted so my post wouldn’t look like a non sequitur. I mean no implication that you have done what I detailed above.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ale](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f19dbf/32.png) [@Ale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ale)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/26 "2005-01-09T21:37:49Z")

</div>

> [@Tracy Lord](#):
>
> They’re both opinions.

If you like hair splitting then yes, both are opinions, one based in facts and logic, and the other not; I spare you wich one has more weight on me.

> [@Tracy Lord](#):
>
> Two thousand years since the birth of Christ and no one has been able to conclusively prove either way.

Almighty beings beliefs have been around much longer than that, besides since then it has yet to be proven the existance of God, not the other way around, you can´t prove a negative and all that.

> [@Tracy Lord](#):
>
> Faith doesn’t work like that (be it faith in a god or faith that there is none).

I agree, wholeheartdly so.

> [@Tracy Lord](#):
>
> Many scientists believe that there is a god, many don’t. Point being that neither belief is a fact, and we shouldn’t treat either of them as if they are.

Nope, the existance of God (any one) has yet to be proved, therefore it is NOT a fact that there is a God, so you can´t state that both positions, wheter there´s a God or not it´s a fact.

I´d like to point out that I´m perfectly fine with people beliving whatever they fancy, but I draw the line when they start mudding the waters with things like satating that the existance of God is a fact, or that Creationism is a valid theory (not that it has been proposed by anyone here, just and extreme example), etc… Belive what you want, but don´t twist reality like that.

> [@Metacom](#):
>
> Regardless of whether you do or do not believe in God (or any shade of belief in between), can you at least agree that it’s rude to go in to a thread whose premise requires some sort of belief and then hijack it by categorically asserting the contrary?.

I agree, people should be free to maintain a conversation or debate on a topic without external, tendentious interference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NDP](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ndp/32/55_2.png) [@NDP](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/NDP)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/27 "2005-01-09T21:41:13Z")

</div>

> [@gobear](#):
>
> How many atheists in polyester suits do you see begging for bucks on TV?

Perhaps they should consider it. Maybe that’s the movement’s problem: it isn’t sufficiently media-savvy.

They could start their own anti-religious network–a Trinity Broadcasting for atheists. I, for one, would like to see what their counter-proselytizing shows would be like.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/28 "2005-01-09T21:43:30Z")

</div>

Well, this thread makes clear how much **fucking** good I’ve done in six years here – to wit, and with cites, **fuck all** , zero, zilch, forget it – you could have saved your breath.

Not because people disagree about God – that’s life. But because they have no idea that it’s possible to **respect** each other, and **care about** each other, even if they disagree.

I didn’t really need to have to face this right about now. But it’s probably a good thing that it came out, and I did.

Enjoy your battles – you seem to like them more than the idea of peace, after all. ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Metacom](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ecae2f/32.png) [@Metacom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Metacom)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/29 "2005-01-09T21:43:52Z")

</div>

> [@iampunha](#):
>
> I’d say it’s also rude to go into a thread like “So who here’s an atheist” and say “God exists. That’s all there is to it.” If it isn’t a debate thread, why bother starting shit in it?

I agree: that would be equally rude.

However (and this may just be because, as a theist, I’m more sensitive to theistic threads getting shat in), _on the SDMB_, I think it’s way, way more common for debates or discussions on religious topics to get hijacked with “There is no God. You may as well believe in a pink fairy” type stuff then for atheist-themed threads to get hijacked with “Y’all are goin’ to burn in he-ell!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/30 "2005-01-09T21:45:17Z")

</div>

> [@gobear](#):
>
> Sorry, but you’re a liar. I didn’t shit in your god thread because I don’t intrude in clubby type threads, anymore than I would if you were discussing Star Trek or Barbie dresses. I responded in this thread because it was a direct challenge to atheists to shut up, and you called me “intolerant” for saying what I believed and for bweing less-than-reverent to theism.

OK. I see your problem here.

A) I didn’t start this thread. Go take a look at the OP, note the difference between my name and his.

B) I never accused you of taking part in what the OP described. In fact, I believe I wrote “And if you’ve never shitted all over a thread like that, then thank you.”

C) No, I don’t have a problem with what you believe or how you act. The fact that you remind me an awful lot of other evangalists, yeah. That bothers me a little.

But regardless of all that, if you don’t make a habit of doing what the OP outlined, then I don’t see any real issue here. This thread is about them, not you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tracy\_Lord](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ec9cab/32.png) [@Tracy\_Lord](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tracy_Lord)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/31 "2005-01-09T21:52:12Z")

</div>

> [@Ale](#):
>
> Nope, the existance of God (any one) has yet to be proved, therefore it is NOT a fact that there is a God, so you can´t state that both positions, wheter there´s a God or not it´s a fact.

Isn’t that what I said?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/a8b319/32.png) [@wolfman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfman)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/32 "2005-01-09T22:01:16Z")

</div>

The premis of this thread is that it is an opinion, not a fact.

Anybody who disagrees with that premis is saying that it is a fact. Therefore the onus is on them to prove that fact, that there isn’t a god. If anybody wants to take a shot at that go ahead.

If someone claims “there is a god” is fact then the onus is on them to prove _their_ fact. However that is not the claim of this thread.

It’s pretty damn simple logic. “You can’t prove there is a god” is not a falsification of the statement “You can’t prove there isn’t a god”. Both statements can be concurently valid and since I am not aware of any argument in the 10,000ish years of humanity that prove either way, both statements are true. Which pretty much, by deffinition, means that either thought is an opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revtim](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/revtim/32/1042_2.png) [@Revtim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revtim)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/33 "2005-01-09T22:05:15Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny Bravo](#):
>
> Evangelistic athiests are just as annoying as any other type of preacher.

I’ve yet to hear of any that matches up with Fred “God Hates Fags” Phelps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 10:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/34 "2005-01-09T22:10:03Z")

</div>

> [@Revtim](#):
>
> I’ve yet to hear of any that matches up with Fred “God Hates Fags” Phelps.

Guys like Phelps are total abberations, even among fundies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/8797f3/32.png) [@lel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lel)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 10:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/35 "2005-01-09T22:12:37Z")

</div>

The funny thing is that _in my opinion_ it’s perfectly logical to study theology without believing in a god anyway.

In the context of the linked thread, “There is no God” doesn’t even answer the OP all that well anyway. (Maybe one could make an argument that there is no importance to theological study, but I think it would need to be fleshed out a whole lot more.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/36 "2005-01-09T22:19:07Z")

</div>

Don’t despair, just yet, **Poly**. I suspect that the participants in this thread are not your actual audience, anyway, having chosen their sides, their views, and their approaches to their opponents years ago.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Loopydude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/e56c9b/32.png) [@Loopydude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loopydude)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/37 "2005-01-09T22:23:19Z")

</div>

Well, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, as you theists love to hammer into our poor little heads.

Fine.

How about, given the predominantly fictional nature of the Judeo-Christian scriptural account of World History (just to pick an example), the utter lack of any objective reason to lend credence to the posited view of the Ultimate as the munificent, concerned, and all-knowing-and-powerful Diety of the Judeo-Christian tradition, the extant plethora of other religious traditions, all making equally unsupportable, often mutually-exclusive claims to absolute truth, with no objective means of discerning which should be favored, and the wealth of evidential information being uncovered on a daily basis strongly suggesting no supernatural agents are required to explain the natural world, I say I find the whole notion of the existence of a worshipful God _ **pretty damned unlikely** _.

That seem more intellectually honest and sufficiently respectful of your delusion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Homebrew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c89c15/32.png) [@Homebrew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Homebrew)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/38 "2005-01-09T22:28:26Z")

</div>

> [@Polycarp](#):
>
> I didn’t really need to have to face this right about now. But it’s probably a good thing that it came out, and I did.

I don’t see this thread as enough to cause you seeming despair. Is something up, **Poly**? Need an ear?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Futile\_Gesture](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f05b48/32.png) [@Futile\_Gesture](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Futile_Gesture)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/39 "2005-01-09T22:30:08Z")

</div>

I’m an agnostic.

All you theists and atheists are as bad as each other and are equally wrong.  
And that’s a fact.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2005, 10:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925/40 "2005-01-09T22:32:20Z")

</div>

(Now, if I were to start a **Pit** thread on religious issues, I believe that I would rant against the notion that I was worshipping a being whose sole concern was what I ate, based on the overwhelming prevalence of references to some (never quite identified) D **i** ety. Theist or atheist, could you people please learn how to type “D **e** ity”?)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/there-is-no-god-is-an-opinion-not-a-fact/283925.md?page=3)
