# Things ruined in Germany by the Nazis

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [July 5, 2014, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395 "2014-07-05T05:17:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Donnerwetter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b2d939/32.png) [@Donnerwetter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Donnerwetter)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 7:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/161 "2014-08-22T07:10:38Z")

</div>

In German, the word _führer_ as a part of a compound noun is unsuspicious. For instance, a _Fremdenführer_ is a tour guide and a book that describes hiking routes is a _Wanderführer_. Even the most die-hard Nazi hunter wouldn’t be alarmed (although there is an urban legend that the US military government in Germany in 1945 was arresting men who described their occupation as _Kranführer_ (=crane operator).

But especially in the political sphere, the term _Führer_ is taboo. For instance, when President Obama praises another politician in a speech by saying “thank you senator/secretary/prime minister/chancellor (insert name) for your leadership”, German language translators are cringing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UDS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecae2f/32.png) [@UDS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 7:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/162 "2014-08-22T07:41:27Z")

</div>

> [@vontsira](#):
>
> This all makes sound sense. I had initially imagined, though, that the political / tight security side of the whole situation, would be likely to trump any sort of convenience for the public, or attempt not to waste money. Had envisaged West Berliners who wanted to travel east; having to endure taking the standard permitted way(s) through the Wall – Checkpoint Charlie or whatever – to get to Ostbahnhof in East Berlin, and board their train there…

No. It worked like this:

The main long-distance stations serving West Berlin was Friedrichstrasse which, confusingly, was in East Berlin -but only just. Matters were set up so the Platform A was accessible from the West, without going through border crossing procedures, and long-distance trains stopped at Platform A. Thus a _Westi_ could board the Paris-Moscow train, say, at Friedrichstrasse.

_Ostis_, however, could not access Platform A without going through border exit procedures, even though they were not technically crossing the border in going to Platform A . But the same train would stop at the Ostbahnhof a few minutes later, also in the Eastern sector, and Ostis could board it there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 12:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/163 "2014-08-22T12:51:11Z")

</div>

> [@Mops](#):
>
> _Führer_: a human guide (e.g. to a city or attractions), generally a person whose function is local knowledge as opposed to leadership (the leadership angle of the word has been killed off by Nazism)

I’ve got several paper guides labeled “_führer_”, as well, both from Germany and Switzerland.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mops](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mops/32/16494_2.png) [@Mops](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mops)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 1:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/164 "2014-08-22T13:55:17Z")

</div>

> [@Nava](#):
>
> I’ve got several paper guides labeled “_führer_”, as well, both from Germany and Switzerland.

Yes, I neglected to note what **Donnerwetter** mentioned: the word _Führer_ for ‘guide’ carries over from a human guide to a guide document the same way it does in English. A _Wanderführer_, for example, can be a person guiding a hiking tour as well as a book of hiking tour routes. Books, brochures can also be entitled _Führer_ out of a compound noun without causing comment: [Search on German Amazon for books containing _Führer durch …_ e.g. ‘Guide to …’ in the title](http://www.amazon.de/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?__mk_de_DE=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&tag=11988-21&url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=%22F%C3%BChrer+durch%22&sprefix=F%C3%BChrer+durch+d%2Cstripbooks%2C420&rh=n%3A186606%2Ck%3A%22F%C3%BChrer+durch%22)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Bredin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/96bed5/32.png) [@John\_Bredin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Bredin)\
**Post date:** [August 22, 2014, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/165 "2014-08-22T17:30:02Z")

</div>

> [@Donnerwetter](#):
>
> But especially in the political sphere, the term _Führer_ is taboo. For instance, when President Obama praises another politician in a speech by saying “thank you senator/secretary/prime minister/chancellor (insert name) for your leadership”, German language translators are cringing.

So not just “leader” (a person) but “leadership” (the concept) is taboo? :eek: Surely there must be an un-baggage-y German word for the concept of positive non-dictatorial leadership? :dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vontsira](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/51bf81/32.png) [@vontsira](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vontsira)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 9:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/166 "2014-08-23T09:51:41Z")

</div>

> [@vontsira](#):
>
> This all makes sound sense. I had initially imagined, though, that the political / tight security side of the whole situation, would be likely to trump any sort of convenience for the public, or attempt not to waste money. Had envisaged West Berliners who wanted to travel east; having to endure taking the standard permitted way(s) through the Wall – Checkpoint Charlie or whatever – to get to Ostbahnhof in East Berlin, and board their train there…

> [@UDS](#):
>
> No. It worked like this:
> 
> The main long-distance stations serving West Berlin was Friedrichstrasse which, confusingly, was in East Berlin -but only just. Matters were set up so the Platform A was accessible from the West, without going through border crossing procedures, and long-distance trains stopped at Platform A. Thus a _Westi_ could board the Paris-Moscow train, say, at Friedrichstrasse.
> 
> _Ostis_, however, could not access Platform A without going through border exit procedures, even though they were not technically crossing the border in going to Platform A . But the same train would stop at the Ostbahnhof a few minutes later, also in the Eastern sector, and Ostis could board it there.

Dankeschoen ! When this stuff was going on, I was lamentably vague about it; essentially, at the time I was more interested in what the system’s remaining steam locomotives were doing. I gather dimly that as well as the above, there were lesser complications and oddities in the Berlin rail-transport situation; no doubt Googling would, in time, let one get the full picture. One is tempted to feel that if those concerned had set out from the first, to make this whole scene as crazy and cumbersome as possible; they could hardly have made a better job of doing so, than what actually did come about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mops](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mops/32/16494_2.png) [@Mops](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mops)\
**Post date:** [August 23, 2014, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/167 "2014-08-23T19:39:54Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Bredin](#):
>
> So not just “leader” (a person) but “leadership” (the concept) is taboo? :eek: Surely there must be an un-baggage-y German word for the concept of positive non-dictatorial leadership? :dubious:

_Jein_. What **Donnerwetter** probably referred to:  
(a) The German term for leadership, _Führung_, has no Nazi connotations to Germans - but to foreigners, listening to the German translation, it will probably sound unfortunate - _Führer_ probably being one of the few German words they are familiar with  
(b) The connotations of the term leadership as used in English speechifying does not map 100% to the German term _Führung_ IMO - leadership can mean a person using their personal influence to point a way and others to follow of their own free will. The uses of _Führung_ that I am familiar with are all aspects of management, i.e. implying a de jure subordination of the followers to the person exercising leadership.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panamajack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/47e85d/32.png) [@panamajack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panamajack)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2014, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/168 "2014-08-24T04:04:08Z")

</div>

> [@Fishtar](#):
>
> So count “Deutschland Uber Alles” as a thing ruined. They still play it sometimes but instead of **“Germany Germany above everything. Above everything in the world.”** The lyrics now are;
> 
> \*\*. Unity and justice and freedom  
> For the German Fatherland!  
> For these let us all strive  
> Brotherly with heart and hand!  
> \*\*

This is from much earlier in the thread, but these aren’t ‘new’ lyrics, they’re just from the third and final stanza. They did replace the old (first) stanza in use.

The song was truly ruined by the Nazis, though, since the original intention of “_Deutschland über ales_” was not ‘Germany will rule over everyone’, but that ‘above all else, the concept of Germany is important’. It was written at a time when a unified Germany did not yet exist.  
Although even without being ruined it wasn’t likely to stay popular with the neighbors, as the proposed borders of a potential Germany in the song go well outside the modern lines. They were about as optimistic as one could make them even in the time it was written.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leo\_Bloom](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leo_bloom/32/10377_2.png) [@Leo\_Bloom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leo_Bloom)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2014, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/169 "2014-08-24T15:19:56Z")

</div>

> [@panamajack](#):
>
> …
> 
> The song was truly ruined by the Nazis, though, since the original intention of “_Deutschland über ales_” was not ‘Germany will rule over everyone’, but that ‘above all else, the concept of Germany is important’. …

A massive hijack is apropos\* but coincidental on this, and your comment has an interesting linguistic match: the same applies, with appropriate adjustments, to Nietzsche’s word/concept “Übermensch.”

Although I don’t know how much of the mis-meaning was promulgated from the get-go by Nietzsche’s hated brother-in-law, a Nazi avant la lettre.\*

\*Swings and strokes a double.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panamajack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/47e85d/32.png) [@panamajack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panamajack)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2014, 2:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/170 "2014-08-25T02:02:26Z")

</div>

> [@panamajack](#):
>
> “_Deutschland über ales_”

:smack: Oops, I guess this must have referred to Germany’s prowess in beer-making. Which is the second stanza of the song… (technically it praises German wine.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2014, 12:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/171 "2014-08-26T12:42:06Z")

</div>

> [@UDS](#):
>
> That’s t-bonham’s point. We don’t need to point to Hitler/WWII to explain why it was considered politically unfeasible to hold India against the wishes of its population by force and repression. It has already been established well before Hitler came along that it was politically unfeasible for the British to hold a country against the wishes of its population by force and repression.

_White majority_ countries yes. Not otherwise. As many people not just in India found out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UDS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecae2f/32.png) [@UDS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2014, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/172 "2014-08-26T13:50:00Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> _White majority_ countries yes. Not otherwise. As many people not just in India found out.

Well, true, as the Kenyans and the Malaysians can testify, among others.

But look what happens here. In 1922, before Hitler, the British pull out of (most of) Ireland after an initial attempt to hold it by force. Then during the 1920s they grant a substantial degree of independence to white-majority dominions, and to (white-ruled, but not white-majority) South Africa.

Then, after Hitler, the British let India go without any kind of War of Independence. But in the 50s and 60s they are a bit more selective; some places have to fight a war for independence, but others do not.

The point is, though, there is no difference between before Hitler and after Hitler. Both before and after Hitler, some places have to fight, and others do not, to secure independence. The orginal suggestion in post #60 that, because of Hitler, the British couldn’t hold India by force doesn’t really hold up. Both before and after Hitler the British attempted to hold some places by force. India just didn’t happen to be one of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2014, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/173 "2014-08-26T14:00:04Z")

</div>

The supposition is correct. If there had been no WW2, the British would have been able to hold on indefinitely. The war destroyed Britain’s ability to do so. And the US was not willing to help them at that time. A few years later, they would have.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UDS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecae2f/32.png) [@UDS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2014, 2:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/174 "2014-08-26T14:37:41Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> The supposition is correct. If there had been no WW2, the British would have been able to hold on indefinitely. The war destroyed Britain’s ability to do so. And the US was not willing to help them at that time. A few years later, they would have.

I accept that the war had drained Britain’s resources so much that holding India by force was impossible. Perhaps I’m reading post #60 wrongly, but I took the suggestion to be that the example of _Hitler_ specifically, not just the practical consequences of a big war, made holding India undemocratically by force a political and moral non-starter, as well as militarily unfeasible. And I don’t think that suggestion would be correct.

Even before the war, as I understand it, the UK’s official plan for India was always full Dominion status, like Canada and New Zealand, but All In Good Time. Given that, long term occupation of India by military force was always going to be difficult to justify, even before Hitler came along. There was also the problem that occupation of India largely depended on the continued loyalty of the Indian Army and, really, why would you expect that, if dominion status was repeatedly deferred? I don’t think Hitler changed these calculations very much.

If there was a British decolonisation which was accelerated by Hitler, it wasn’t India; it was Palestine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2014, 4:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/175 "2014-08-26T16:05:43Z")

</div>

No the actual plan was to hold on to India, however to transfer most of the day to day powers to the eventually elected provincial governments., while maintaining control in the centre. After all, the other dominions would never accept India as a dominion, since it was so big it would dwarf all of them (official reason) and it was non white (the real problem), and the Indian Army was needed to further British policies in the Mid East and the Pacific.

German racial policies had little to do with the decision to leave. Their military policies OTH, were key.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enterprise](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/76d3ee/32.png) [@Enterprise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enterprise)\
**Post date:** [August 26, 2014, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/176 "2014-08-26T17:51:51Z")

</div>

On this Führer/Leiter thing (and I’m sorry if someone already said that):

> [@Mr.Kobayashi](#):
>
> Wiki notes that it’s still used in compound words too, although I imagine anyone referring to themselves as fuhrer instead of leiter would raise serious eyebrows.

I’m not sure how many words there are where the “-führer” -“leiter” substitution really took place, and/or works. We’re still using the Word “Führer” quite frequently where it’s appropriate. Hitler, of course, was “Führer” metaphorically, “leading” his people to glory, etc. There’s still plenty of people who lead/guide people even today: museum guides, hiking guides, mountain guides, all of who are Führer–Museumsführer, Wanderführer, Bergführer, respectively (both if they’re people and if they’re books, incidentally). And none of them could possibly be “leiter”. By contrast, yes, we do say stuff like “Gruppenleiter” for work group heads, for example, but I’m not sure those were ever called “Gruppenführer”. You can’t say Gruppenführer primarily because that’s just an SS rank, not because of the “führer” bit…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EinsteinsHund](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/einsteinshund/32/8400_2.png) [@EinsteinsHund](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EinsteinsHund)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2014, 12:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/177 "2014-08-27T12:02:57Z")

</div>

> [@Enterprise](#):
>
> On this Führer/Leiter thing (and I’m sorry if someone already said that):
> 
> I’m not sure how many words there are where the “-führer” -“leiter” substitution really took place, and/or works. We’re still using the Word “Führer” quite frequently where it’s appropriate. Hitler, of course, was “Führer” metaphorically, “leading” his people to glory, etc. There’s still plenty of people who lead/guide people even today: museum guides, hiking guides, mountain guides, all of who are Führer–Museumsführer, Wanderführer, Bergführer, respectively (both if they’re people and if they’re books, incidentally). And none of them could possibly be “leiter”. By contrast, yes, we do say stuff like “Gruppenleiter” for work group heads, for example, but I’m not sure those were ever called “Gruppenführer”. You can’t say Gruppenführer primarily because that’s just an SS rank, not because of the “führer” bit…

If I remember correctly, when I was in the Bundeswehr the leader of a small unit of about 12 men was officially called “Gruppenführer”. I’ve never had a second thought about it.

ETA: [looks like I was right](http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gruppenf%C3%BChrer). The translation is “squad leader”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Donnerwetter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b2d939/32.png) [@Donnerwetter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Donnerwetter)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2014, 12:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/178 "2014-08-27T12:37:37Z")

</div>

> [@EinsteinsHund](#):
>
> If I remember correctly, when I was in the Bundeswehr the leader of a small unit of about 12 men was officially called “Gruppenführer”. I’ve never had a second thought about it.
> 
> ETA: [looks like I was right](http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gruppenf%C3%BChrer). The translation is “squad leader”.

There are even more _führer_ in the modern day Germany military: _Zugführer_ (platoon leader), _Rechnungsführer_ (paymaster) and I’m sure there are more. The term _führer_ becomes a problem when used in a political context.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EinsteinsHund](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/einsteinshund/32/8400_2.png) [@EinsteinsHund](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EinsteinsHund)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2014, 1:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/179 "2014-08-27T13:14:20Z")

</div>

> [@Donnerwetter](#):
>
> There are even more _führer_ in the modern day Germany military: _Zugführer_ (platoon leader), _Rechnungsführer_ (paymaster) and I’m sure there are more. The term _führer_ becomes a problem when used in a political context.

That’s right. I can imagine a politician saying “Unsere Partei braucht eine starke Führung” (“Our party needs a strong leadership”), but “Unsere Partei braucht einen starken _Führer_” wouldn’t fly at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leo\_Bloom](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leo_bloom/32/10377_2.png) [@Leo\_Bloom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leo_Bloom)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2014, 4:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395/180 "2014-11-21T04:10:13Z")

</div>

Look at selections from [this book](http://imgur.com/a/8t6Kl) I found. Amazing. Not just the individual items you can read there even in these photos, but the very book itself. I found it at a used book store before it was even looked at by staff. All set to buy it, they took it away, back it comes: $100.

Too rich for my blood. But I have it on hold. PM me for details if you want it and I’ll keep the hold on. **Mr. Kobayashi** , OP, gets dibs, of course.

Finder’s fee: if the buyer is a Member: Change the little thingie under your username for one week to read " Doper **Leo Bloom** says “Hi” "  
If not a member, be nice to someone or a dog or something.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395.md?page=8)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/things-ruined-in-germany-by-the-nazis/692395.md?page=10)
