# This election has just changed, Justice Scalia has died

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [February 13, 2016, 10:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052 "2016-02-13T22:12:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/21 "2016-02-13T22:33:31Z")

</div>

Putting aside the conflict between my humanitarian feelings and how I felt about Scalia’s rulings, from a political standpoint this is absolutely huge and maybe yet another crazy twist to a truly crazy election year.

Or is it?

Isn’t President Obama entitled and duty bound to appoint a replacement well within the remaining year of his tenure?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smapti](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smapti/32/17938_2.png) [@Smapti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smapti)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/22 "2016-02-13T22:34:10Z")

</div>

> [@Aperez77](#):
>
> The President never has much trouble nominating whoever he wants.

Tell that to Justices Miers and Bork.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/23 "2016-02-13T22:35:10Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Politically, to appease their own base of support, I think the Republican leadership has no choice but to oppose any possible nominee from Obama.

For a year? I think that would be a horrible mistake for the Republican Senate, even though two of them are still in the Presidential race. Perhaps they could drag it out by voting down a nominee or two, but to spend a year refusing to vote on a nomination for the Supreme Court would be seen by almost all as simply ridiculous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Richard\_Parker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/35a633/32.png) [@Richard\_Parker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Richard_Parker)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/24 "2016-02-13T22:36:15Z")

</div>

> [@Jonathan\_Chance](#):
>
> What happens to anything they’ve already heard? Is Scalia’s vote nullified?

The vote doesn’t count until the case is decided. So we may well see different outcomes than anticipated in a whole range of cases.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonathan\_Chance](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jonathan_chance/32/701_2.png) [@Jonathan\_Chance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jonathan_Chance)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/25 "2016-02-13T22:36:23Z")

</div>

That’s two in twenty years. Everyone got their other nominations through.

And I don’t know that Obama is required to nominate someone in a timely manner. But he’d be a fool not to do so. They want to obstruct? Let them obstruct and be obvious about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/26 "2016-02-13T22:36:32Z")

</div>

[The responses on Free Republic](http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3396676/posts) are rich.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/27 "2016-02-13T22:37:34Z")

</div>

> [@Shalmanese](#):
>
> I think the more interesting question is how this affects the Republican calculus and whether electability becomes a more important criteria. As much noise has been made, Clinton was always the strong favorite to become the nominee. However, will this cause a sapping of Trump support in favor of more establishment candidates? I think it’s anyone’s guess at this point.

Before the start of the primaries there were doubts about Trump or Cruz not becoming the Republican nominee, now I do think that it is likely that one of them will be. Knowing the quality of people Trump [is choosing](https://ballotpedia.org/Sam_Clovis) [to kowtow](http://www.latinpost.com/articles/111609/20160126/donald-trump-endorsements-sheriff-joe-arpaio-endorses-gop-front-runner-in-iowa.htm) in this election, points to where I do think Trump will get his judges.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Superdude](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/superdude/32/13450_2.png) [@Superdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Superdude)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/28 "2016-02-13T22:37:41Z")

</div>

But do you really think that, as much as the Right has tried to tie Obama to all of the current problems we have, they’re going to even attempt to find some middle ground candidate?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FlikTheBlue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fliktheblue/32/10972_2.png) [@FlikTheBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FlikTheBlue)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/29 "2016-02-13T22:38:54Z")

</div>

Assuming that Obama is unable to appoint someone, would the candidates begin looking for an appointee in waiting? Would it better for the candidates to name a specific person rather than just saying “I’ll look into a nominee for the court after I get elected?” I could see that becoming a huge mess. I also think it would be an advantage for the Democrats.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/30 "2016-02-13T22:40:41Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> Tell that to Justices Miers and Bork.

Bork was deeply flawed and Miers was unqualified. Many candidates aren’t that obviously partisan until they reveal their true colors during their tenure. They just need to have most of the right answers during the confirmation grillings. Holy crap this is huge!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FlikTheBlue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fliktheblue/32/10972_2.png) [@FlikTheBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FlikTheBlue)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/31 "2016-02-13T22:44:09Z")

</div>

The Republicans are trying to hold on to the Senate, and most of the seats coming up this cycle are for Republican incumbents. If those senators up for reelection obstruct the nominee, I think that would be a huge negative against them, at least for those Republican senators running in blue and purple states.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/32 "2016-02-13T22:44:13Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> [The responses on Free Republic](http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3396676/posts) are rich.

I like this one:

> [@](#):
>
> Who was there? Who had ties to the WH?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/33 "2016-02-13T22:44:40Z")

</div>

> [@Frank](#):
>
> For a year? I think that would be a horrible mistake for the Republican Senate, even though two of them are still in the Presidential race. Perhaps they could drag it out by voting down a nominee or two, but to spend a year refusing to vote on a nomination for the Supreme Court would be seen by almost all as simply ridiculous.

Maybe, but I suspect that the right could spin it as T_he Senate Bravely Defending The Nation Against The Kenyan Muslim Usurper’s attempt to Undermine Our Liberties with a nominee who would be Satan’s Minion_.

In other words, we might see campaigns (for GOP Senate races) touting any obstruction efforts as being courageous and admirable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/34 "2016-02-13T22:45:03Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> Tell that to Justices Miers and Bork.

Everyone thought Miers was a terrible choice. She never got her nomination off the ground before bowing out because there was bipartisan “WTF?” to the idea.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leaper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/4bbf92/32.png) [@Leaper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaper)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/35 "2016-02-13T22:45:06Z")

</div>

> [@Frank](#):
>
> For a year? I think that would be a horrible mistake for the Republican Senate, even though two of them are still in the Presidential race. Perhaps they could drag it out by voting down a nominee or two, but to spend a year refusing to vote on a nomination for the Supreme Court would be seen by almost all as simply ridiculous.

Yeah, I tend to agree. Obama might have to moderate his choice a bit, but I don’t see us going into 2017 with an eight member court.

What I find interesting is how the candidates, especially Republican, will answer the inevitable questions of, “will you nominate someone who will do X?” I know they’ve already been asked, but people may pay even more attention to the answers now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/36 "2016-02-13T22:47:31Z")

</div>

> [@Shalmanese](#):
>
> However, will this cause a sapping of Trump support in favor of more establishment candidates?

One shudders to think who or what Trump would appoint.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/37 "2016-02-13T22:48:46Z")

</div>

> [@Leaper](#):
>
> Yeah, I tend to agree. Obama might have to moderate his choice a bit, but I don’t see us going into 2017 with an eight member court.

Nominate Sanders! 😉

It would be proper for Obama to nominate a candidate and have them go through a legitimate confirmation hearing but I’m going to be surprised if it happens.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/38 "2016-02-13T22:50:22Z")

</div>

Wait until Obama nominates Sanders for the position.

It’s eleven months until Obama leaves office. Has any Supreme Court vacancy lasted eleven months since the Civil War? I couldn’t find any in a quick search. I don’t think there is a possibility of it happening now. Obama will nominate a liberal (probably a person of color) and there will be a battle, but it will be next to impossible to deny the nomination if it a person as supremely [sic] qualified as I assume will happen.

Look forward to one million comments about imagining Trump nominating a Supreme Court Justice. Some of them in actual ads.

Double ninja!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dalej42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@dalej42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dalej42)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/39 "2016-02-13T22:54:06Z")

</div>

It’ll be quite interesting to see how this affects vulnerable Senators such as Mark Kirk here in Illinois. He’s fighting for his political life and I doubt he wants to be part of an 11 month long obstruction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [February 13, 2016, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052/40 "2016-02-13T22:54:43Z")

</div>

> [@Jophiel](#):
>
> Nominate Sanders! 😉

That would be cool. (He’d be the only Justice never to have attended law school, or at least had the sort of training lawyers had back in the nineteenth century.)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/this-election-has-just-changed-justice-scalia-has-died/746052.md?page=3)
