Nevermind, made this brilliant observation earlier.
Right. The truth or falsity of the statement “Women are less likely to be strong national leaders than men” isn’t affected by pointing at examples like Queen Elizabeth I or Indira Gandhi, because it’s a statement about averages, not individuals.
That’s not quite true, we’ve identified some proteins that affect IQ, like this one:
That’s not necessarily true, although it might be. Ireland traditionally had a very large fraction of its population emigrate, which might well have included the most intelligent people, which in turn would mean that the people left at home would be a lower-IQ pool (due to their genetics). I don’t know exactly when the mass migration flow stopped, but if it ended around the 1970s or so, and if emigration selected for the smartest people, then you’d expect to see the population starting to gain in IQ starting in the 1980s (which is exactly what we do see).
I suspect a good part of why Ireland is on par with Europe today have to do with nutrition, urbanization, etc., but it’s not impossible that there might be changes in the gene pool because the mass emigration flow slowed down.
… They call him “Melanin” Jelloul…
Your link didn’t work, but this one doesn’t say anything at all about intelligence. This article describes a correlation (though it didn’t use actual IQ tests), though it says nothing about the prevalence of the gene in various populations.
This is a fine hypothesis, but that’s all it is.
Personal insults aren’t allowed outside of the Pit; don’t do this again.
Further, some of the new posts are addressed to people who have long ago ceased to participate in the thread. If there are folks here who want to continue this discussion, feel free to start anew. I’m going to close this.