I’m pretty sure I know how to control statistics of societies by controlling sexual choice, but honestly, I can’t give you much more than this.
It seems odd to link so many disparate items of social construction to one variable modified in different ways, but that’s effectively how I see the world, a domino effect of behavior and environment, with certain consistencies that can be artificially produced to control those variables.
The primary variables I know are sexual choice and suicidal tension.
The problem here is that I don’t think you understand how much you are raising the bar here… I know it’s true, but you might not know it’s true, and you want proof. I wish you could just see it, but alas… actually I want everyone to know these laws, but people won’t believe me.
There is one way to run this experiment. I need to develop ways to control people’s thoughts and affect remotely and work with pockets of the population to control sexual choice, while other people aren’t being controlled at all, and modulate the sexual choice variables in different pockets of the human population to actually prove this stuff to you.
That might take a while. I’m in the infancy of working on that stuff. Actually, if you just agreed with me, it wouldn’t be necessary, but it is my life’s mission to get everyone to understand the law of sexual choice on affect and behavior.
I have no ethical quandaries with developing this technology with regards to human suffering because by controlling these studies I actually add more good to the world than bad by making some pockets of women select more adaptive aggression structures. I would only have to slightly increase the damage women already to assure that only the bullies get sex, but to have other pockets of the population where women actually give non-bullies most the sex is such a tremendous aberration that it actually adds more good to the world to do this study than to not do this study.
Perhaps the technology might have other problems, but… I can always destroy it after the study. It is my life’s mission before I die to teach the entire world the tremendous consequences of giving the most aggressive people the most sexual choice, and I will stop at nothing that isn’t ethical, to make sure that they cannot deny it.
I planned to do read-only, but I’m starting to realize that people are in tremendous denial about sexual choice, so I am going to go into write access once I solve the read problem.
Dude, you still didn’t give me a direct answer! Your arguments are obvious to you because they’re in your brain; if I ask what seems to be a question with an obvious answer, it’s because I genuinely need the answer if I am to fully understand your position. So -
Your position is that 1-3% of men opt out of this system, 0% of women opt out of this system. Yes or no?
Sorry, I thought I answered it earlier, and round about in your reply. Women look for very specific traits in men, they are basically psychopath filters, and on the continuum of psychopathy, you can easily assume that if a woman has had sex with a man, that he is on the continuum. Women do not select males who prevent war, suicide, homicide, torture and rape for sexual partners. The answer is “no”.
Here we are now, I’m looking ten years ahead, this thread is done and I have made my decision.
It is literally my life’s mission for people to understand the impact that they have upon this species by giving sex to bullies, and I will stop at nothing short of something that is clearly unethical to prove it. I had to change my plans a bit because I thought people could see reason, but they cannot. So, I will give them the reason that they seek.
You must just be a different person, who just happens to have a rambling, imaginary, grand-unifying, suicide-related mathematical theory of male-female social interaction. It’s more common than I expected.
