# Those were some mighty damned expensive pictures!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [February 2, 2006, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739 "2006-02-02T22:19:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/1 "2006-02-02T22:19:49Z")

</div>

I just got back from a court case (in which I was the defendant) involving 10 photgraphs that I borrowed from a relative. I made copies, and sent them to various other relatives. I lost the originals, and only had the copies. The relative took me to court for a total of $2000 or the return of the pictures (which I no longer have). The plaintiff did not want copies, either.

His judgment: For the plaintiff. The full $2000.

:dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Taters](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/taters/32/2845_2.png) [@Taters](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Taters)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/2 "2006-02-02T22:31:35Z")

</div>

:eek: ☹

This was a _relative_ that sued?! Geeze, that’s awful. I’m sorry that things turned out this way for you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/3 "2006-02-02T22:47:48Z")

</div>

Were they really valuable in some way? Or just regular pictures that you lost? I hope that they were collectible or something at least.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cabdude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/58956e/32.png) [@cabdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cabdude)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 10:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/4 "2006-02-02T22:57:54Z")

</div>

Were the pictures of the relative in a compromising position?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hal\_Briston](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/a9a28c/32.png) [@Hal\_Briston](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hal_Briston)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 11:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/5 "2006-02-02T23:02:48Z")

</div>

Were they pictures _of_ the relative? If so, I’m thinking some apporpriate Photshopping is in order.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cranky\_Hermit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/13edae/32.png) [@Cranky\_Hermit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cranky_Hermit)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/6 "2006-02-02T23:05:24Z")

</div>

Wow! $2000.00 for 10 pictures?!!! That IS expensive. Sorry! That said, though, maybe next time you’ll be more careful with borrowed property. Is this a relative you dislike (before the court case)? If so, now you’ll probably never need to see them again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smeghead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Smeghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smeghead)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 11:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/7 "2006-02-02T23:15:08Z")

</div>

Were they 8 by 10 color glossy photos with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anastasaeon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/73ab20/32.png) [@Anastasaeon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anastasaeon)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 11:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/8 "2006-02-02T23:23:58Z")

</div>

Wow! Were they _worth_ $2000? :dubious:

I mean, you’re talking about _pictures_, right? Your relative isn’t like, Jasper Johns, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EddyTeddyFreddy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eddyteddyfreddy/32/18796_2.png) [@EddyTeddyFreddy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EddyTeddyFreddy)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 11:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/9 "2006-02-02T23:47:20Z")

</div>

Wre these wedding pictures?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dag\_Otto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/439d5e/32.png) [@Dag\_Otto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dag_Otto)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2006, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/10 "2006-02-02T23:51:43Z")

</div>

> [@Smeghead](#):
>
> Were they 8 by 10 color glossy photos with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was?

I was thinking of that before I opened the thread.

Was it like Judge Mathis, **Earl**?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 12:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/11 "2006-02-03T00:13:03Z")

</div>

Perhaps they were antique photos that are irreplaceable?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ghanima](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9e8a1a/32.png) [@Ghanima](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ghanima)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 12:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/12 "2006-02-03T00:33:27Z")

</div>

Didn’t the guy have the negatives? Why should you be blamed for his poor judgement? It’s not like you agreed that if you lost the pics you’d pay him $2000…did you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![An\_Arky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/87869e/32.png) [@An\_Arky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/An_Arky)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/13 "2006-02-03T01:12:21Z")

</div>

I’d go cause my relative to need more than $2000 worth of dental work if they did that to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 1:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/14 "2006-02-03T01:31:48Z")

</div>

> [@An Arky](#):
>
> I’d go cause my relative to need more than $2000 worth of dental work if they did that to me.

If they sued you or lost your pictures?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![uncircular](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/c37758/32.png) [@uncircular](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/uncircular)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/15 "2006-02-03T01:48:21Z")

</div>

I’m betting on the judge. There’s more to the story, and it’s not flattering.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/16 "2006-02-03T02:50:13Z")

</div>

These were all photos of various family members, dating from 35-65 years ago. When the judge asked me for my statement, one of the things I mentioned was that I thought that $2000 was a little extreme (especially when I had copies that were of better quality, as they were not made on old paper). Some I could tell had been shot with a Kodak Instamatic 126 camera. The older ones, I don’t know, probably a Brownie.

I didn’t take it as a good sign when the judge said, “I don’t think that’s enough. These are irreplaceable.” :eek: Then he went on to tell a story about a treasured photograph that he had had stolen from his own office desk, and how much he missed that photo.

This was kinda weird. We were in his office for about 15-20 minutes. Until the last two or three minutes, I thought things were going my way. It seemed to turn when the relative (an aunt) showed the blank spots in her photo album, and told the judge that she didn’t want copies because a) she wanted _her_ originals, and b) they wouldn’t fit in the same spots.

Oh, well. Live and learn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marymargaret](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba9def/32.png) [@marymargaret](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/marymargaret)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 3:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/17 "2006-02-03T03:20:34Z")

</div>

Were they professional photos or snapshots?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/earl_snake-hips_tucker/32/3269_2.png) [@Earl\_Snake-Hips\_Tucker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Earl_Snake-Hips_Tucker)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 3:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/18 "2006-02-03T03:28:56Z")

</div>

> [@Earl Snake-Hips Tucker](#):
>
> Some I could tell had been shot with a Kodak Instamatic 126 camera. The older ones, I don’t know, probably a Brownie.

Oh, most definitely snapshots.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Askia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/96bed5/32.png) [@Askia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Askia)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 3:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/19 "2006-02-03T03:37:29Z")

</div>

Yeah, you were doomed when she trotted out the blank spots in the photo album. I can see the wrinkly plastic sheeting and sunburned edges around the white squares now.

This could sooooo be an episode of “My Name Is Earl.”

Still – two grand? OUCH.

Were these high quality copies, at least?

And was this judge in the midlands, the piedmont or the lowcountry? This smells like some ol’ midlands justice to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cabdude](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/58956e/32.png) [@cabdude](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cabdude)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2006, 5:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739/20 "2006-02-03T05:14:39Z")

</div>

Christmas Card List;

Mother  
Father  
Brother  
Sister  
[del]Aunt[/del]

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/those-were-some-mighty-damned-expensive-pictures/342739.md?page=2)
