As I understand it, what’s happened before in history is that a guy would step aside before a vote came in to, uh, topple him; it seems kinda trivial that this guy said aw, I’ll wait for the vote.
The shine seems to have faded from McCarthy, especially in light of the problems finding a replacement. I think “the American Union Worker” is now at the top of the list.
If we’re still willing to give the award to a bad guy, the head of Hamas has a decent claim to have been the most influential person whose impact is new to 2023, not ongoing from earlier times.
To be replaced, somewhat quickly, by Benjamin Netanyahu. The “most newsworthy” event of the year pretty much has to be the latest Israel-Palestine war. The only strike against him is, how afraid is Time’s owners of a backlash?
Bump…I still think it will be Israel/Hamas-related, but I have a feeling it’s going to end up being Avigail Idan (the four-year-old Israeli-American hostage released), possibly with a few other hostages as part of a “group award.”
Still have whoever is elected President as the favorite for 2024, and the first woman and first black person on the moon (assuming (a) the mission is successful and (b) the Chinese don’t get there first) for 2025.
I find it hard to justify naming someone for the current second-biggest war in the world. If it’s even the second.
I think it’s probably going to be AI. AI has made huge strides in the past year, and it’s been behind several of the other news-makers (for instance, the Hollywood strikes were mostly about AI).
While I agree that AI is currently overhyped, it’s still already made more waves than NFTs or the Metaverse ever did. And neither of those other things was really new: NFTs were just cryptocurrency with all of the useful parts stripped out, and the Metaverse was just an established online company trying to branch out and integrate all of their apps together.