I wouldn’t be opposed to removing the procedural filibuster, which as I understand it means “we declare we have enough votes that we’ll threaten to allow this filibuster on this subject if you don’t capitulate, but we won’t actually jeopardize any of our Senators’ reputations by making them do the dirty work of actually, in fact, conducting a filibuster.”
In other words: nobody wants to look bad on TV. They want all the power of the filibuster without any of the sacrifice: namely, standing up in Congress and reading from the dictionary and visibly commit to bringing government to a halt.
I can see getting rid of that. The procedural filibuster is like threatening to bell the cat.