[QUOTE=Chronos]
There’s some good sport fishing in the Lakes, if you’re into that sort of thing, but I would never eat something that came out of them (especially not Erie) if you paid me. You might have heard that the pollutant levels in the water are much lower than they used to be, and that’s true. I’d have no hesitation about swimming in the water. But what doesn’t get so much press is the reason why the water is cleaner. When the zebra mussels invaded, they filtered out many of the pollutants, especially the mercury. But matter is conserved, and that mercury had to go somewhere. It’s now concentrated into the food chain, and more concentrated the higher up the chain you get.
[/QUOTE]
My understanding is that this explanation is somewhat simplistic and not necessarily reflective of the actual merits of various fish in the lakes. To the extent mercury and other pollutants may be present in fish, my understanding is that the majority of fishermen clean their catch. YMMV. Feel free to avoid eating Great Lakes fish. You are needlessly missing out on some mighty good eating.
The lakes are indeed huge in modifying the climate. One benefit of their effect is the existence of several fruit orchards in the area. The lakes limit extreme temperature fluctuations, so when it gets cold in winter it tends to stay cold, as most fruit requires a certain number of days of sufficient cold. Then, when things thaw, there tend not to be subsequent hard freezes that will damage developing fruit. Which means more pie and cobbler for me!
[QUOTE=Shirley]
I’ve always figured you were from England.
[/QUOTE]
Wow! Just … wow!
Or should I say, Blimey, I’m gobsmacked!