Yes, he brings this particular idiocy to many different topics.
Although a recent favorite was that healthcare in Canada sucks because it does not cover the Tim Horton’s doughnuts that someone has to buy on the way to a medical appointment.
Dude, that’s nothing.
And I ain’t gonna look to see where the stupid starts for fear of increasing the brain damage I already suffered from him in that thread.
CMC fnord!
Hey, hey… no need to bring Sam Stone into this, now. Go get your own tactics.
You probably think your stance is something reasonable like “Let’s get rid of just the bad regulations, the ones that don’t work,” but because you’re such a shitty debater who cannot drop the sarcasm and misattribution of others’ positions, nobody can actually understand what the fuck your stance actually is. And here you are being a coy little bitch who thinks he’s being clever by, again, not posting in good faith. You’re like a Rand Rover wannabe, and that’s sad.
If I get any closer, I’ll get some on me and I’ll have to take a shower, won’t I?
Looks like someone just learned that the reality of bukkake parties aren’t as fun as they are in the mind…
I kid, I kid
**emacknight **is basically the unfunny reincarnation of Diogenes the Cynic, minus the personal insults and also minus the entertainment value.
He’s just another sad little troll who somehow believes he knows everything about everything.
Close enough!
Internet glibertarians are a fucking plague.
This so perfectly sums it all up. That thread was started because I was correcting Gonzomax’s lies that nobody in Canada goes bankrupt because of health care costs.
But because that lie was told in support of socialized health care, anyone that corrects it must be a Republican and must be against UHC.
Did I at any point in that thread say that healthcare in Canada sucks? Did I even allude to it?
I spent three pages trying to explain various medically related expenses to you, but all you could do was say, “uh yuk yuk, someone went bankrupt buying a doughnut.”
I love that you accuse me of that, after you wrote:
Fail.
Again with being coy. What about that is fail? That was an honest assessment of your beliefs to the best of my understanding. If it’s wrong, it’s because you really, really suck at debates.
And I fear has mistaken mass bewilderment for mass giving-a-shit.
I guess it’s because you seriously brought up the cost of going to lunch on the way to the hospital in a debate about going banckrupt due to medical expenses.
You turned the thread into a joke all by yourself.
And here I was wondering where I had put the keys to my other 827 vehicles.
How is that a fail? Isn’t that precisely your argument in this thread?
How is this not the exact position ascribed to you in Bosstone’s post?
I am not rude. I do my best to deal with the subject at hand. It is rightys who immediately resort to name calling because they are devoid of arguments. If you don’t understand that, then you are a righty.
Okay, take a deep breath, because I’m about to Blow.Your. Mind.
You just called me a name.
Righty.
(The other issue is that your comment in the other thread was insulting, boorish, and most likely based on a wild ass guess on your part)