I don’t have any hard evidence to refute this (obviously, there isn’t any yet in New York, what with the law only having been in effect for a few days), but I can offer some anecdotal evidence.
Last night I was in two of my regular spots (for New Yorkers, the Ear on Spring and Washington, and the Library on Avenue A between 1st and 2nd Streets). Both bars were much emptier than they usually are on a Tuesday night, and at both the bartenders told me that they were surprised how few people were at the bar.
It’s still a stupid law. It bothers me. It bothers the staff (and I’m not talking about the owners here – the bartenders who work there. If business is down, their tips are down. I bet they’re really grateful for Mayor Bloomberg’s concern for their health, and they won’t mind the drop in their income) at the bars I know. It’s just annoying and paternalistic.
I don’t care if they ban smoking in restaurants, but bars for God’s sake? It’s an annoying smelly habit, but I love doing it with a cold brew in my hand. What about the fat stinky guy sitting next to me? Can I throw him out because he’s not a positive influence? After people start getting loud and drunk, they must get kicked out too. Also, people who wear too much perfume should not be allowed in due to someone’s sensitive nasal passages, or anyone who has loud, annoying bratty kids who cry and scream and hurt my sensitive eardrums. They should step outside as well. sheesh*
We got that no smoking rule in California a long time ago & they got pretty clever with it. First, to legally get around it, they opened their patios to smoking . Some started private bars, where smoking was legal. Some restaurants ignored the law, but eventually had to comply.