# Top five no-budget films
**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851
**Category:** Cafe Society
**Created:** [January 11, 2003, 12:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851 "2003-01-11T00:01:59Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 2
### Author:  [@Apos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Apos)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2003, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/21 "2003-01-11T20:59:07Z")
—I suppose you have to be a “people watcher” to appreciate it though.—
I am a professional people watcher. I just didn’t find these people interesting.
—The entertainment isn’t just handed to you. It’s in the sublte nuances.—
Must have been the kind of subtle that you can invent to enjoy anything.
—I’m sure you didnt’t enjoy Linklater’s other flicks… “Before Sunrise” and “Waking Life”…the list goes on.—
Actually, I did enjoy Before Sunrise quite a bit. I meant to see Waking Life but have yet to catch it.
---
### Author:  [@Lizard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lizard)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2003, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/22 "2003-01-11T21:05:17Z")
> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by TheRealJohnPeat \*
> **Clerks is also KS’s best work by a country mile - which suggests that there’s something in the idea that ‘less is more’.**
Nah. “Chasing Amy” and “Dogma,” while fundamentally different films, are at least as well done.
---
### Author:  [@Daoloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Daoloth)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2003, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/23 "2003-01-11T21:41:13Z")
I’ve heard _It Happened Here_ is good, though I’ve yet to see it.
---
### Author:  [@jesseboy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jesseboy)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2003, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/24 "2003-01-11T22:17:14Z")
Hitchcock’s ‘Psycho’ was mostly an independant movie, for about 60k IIRC. Shot in less than a month-the shower scene took a week though. I’m sure the Coen’s first feature, Blood Simple, didn’t cost too much. Time frame is a consideration here-i’m sure many fine movies were made in the thirties and forties for around 200k. Citizen Kane didn’t even cost a million!
---
### Author:  [@Ms2001](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ms2001)
#### Post date: [January 11, 2003, 11:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/25 "2003-01-11T23:54:50Z")
_Cube_. Also filmed in a single room.
---
### Author:  [@handsomeharry](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/handsomeharry)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 1:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/26 "2003-01-12T01:34:16Z")
i heard that El Mariachi was made for under 10K, but the post production was about a quarter of a mil.
“hmmmm…yes, my movie lord of the rings was done for free-but, then, we had to PAY people”.
---
### Author:  [@El\_Elvis\_Rojo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/El_Elvis_Rojo)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 3:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/27 "2003-01-12T03:26:57Z")
**Evil Dead
Halloween
Six String Samurai** (okay, it all depends on your definition of “good”)
**Running Time**
And virtually every Troma movie 🙂
---
### Author:  [@Tamex](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamex)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 4:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/28 "2003-01-12T04:47:51Z")
How about Mike Jittlov’s [The Wizard of Speed and Time](http://us.imdb.com/Title?0081766)?
---
### Author:  [@Torgo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Torgo)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 4:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/29 "2003-01-12T04:49:29Z")
> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by jesseboy \*
> \*\*Hitchcock’s ‘Psycho’ was mostly an independant movie, for about 60k IIRC. Shot in less than a month-the shower scene took a week though. I’m sure the Coen’s first feature, Blood Simple, didn’t cost too much. Time frame is a consideration here-i’m sure many fine movies were made in the thirties and forties for around 200k. Citizen Kane didn’t even cost a million! \*\*
What the…!? Sixty-thousand?? More like $800,000, not an enormous budget for 1960 but on the low end of typical. Independent? It was a Paramount picture! Alfred Hitchcock shoot a picture in less than a month? Pish-posh!
---
### Author:  [@dinulya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dinulya)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 5:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/30 "2003-01-12T05:22:47Z")
-----No cite, but I seem to recall an article in one of the film mags, some years back, in which a former friend of Rodriguez claimed that the real cost of El Mariachi was more like $200K. Of course, that would spoil all the fun, so I choose to believe the lower figure.----
He did make the original El Mariachi for $7000 and tried to sell it to Spanish Network or video distributor (cannot remember exacly who, but Spanish). Then somebody saw it and recognized the potential, which resulted into additional money to brush it up and bring it to the sellable state.
---
### Author:  [@edwino](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/edwino)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 7:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/31 "2003-01-12T07:11:47Z")
About **Slacker** – it has truly brilliant moments surrounded by lots of slow bits. Just like most of Linklater’s other movies. For instance **Waking Life** (not low budget) was good overall, and brilliant visually, but had very very boring stretches in it which seemed pointless.
The real reason I love **Slacker** so much is because I went to the University of Texas and I have eaten, lived near or in, and walked past about 90% of the movie background. That’s pretty cool.
---
### Author:  [@jesseboy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jesseboy)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 2:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/32 "2003-01-12T14:20:44Z")
To Torgo, i could be wrong about the amount of money involved, but Hitchcock put up alot of his own money. The studio thought this would be a disaster-the female lead gets killed in the first forty minutes??!! Then what, they asked? Also, it was in black and white-color and spectacle were all the rage(Vertigo/North by Northwest). Nothing quite like this had ever been done before-it virtually created the slasher/horror genre.
And he did shoot the movie in a month. Some have speculated that he was trying to outdo Welles’ ‘Touch of Evil’. There are a number similarities between these movies.
---
### Author:  [@Labdad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Labdad)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/33 "2003-01-12T14:49:43Z")
John Sayles’s first film, _The Return of the Secaucus Seven_, was made for about $45,000 IIRC, and in my opinon did a better job of examining college friends getting together for a reunion and bemoaning their lost idealism than did the much more expensive _The Big Chill_, which was made three years later.
---
### Author:  [@Wendell\_Wagner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wendell_Wagner)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/34 "2003-01-12T16:35:25Z")
According to this webpage:
[http://members.cox.net/eddotcom/psy\_text.htm](http://members.cox.net/eddotcom/psy_text.htm)
_Psycho_ cost $806,947.55 to shoot. It was shot in 39 days.
---
### Author:  [@Ravi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravi)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 7:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/35 "2003-01-12T19:18:03Z")
The Roger Corman Vincent Price Poe movies in the early 60’s were a lot of fun for a little money. I read somewhere (can’t remember where) That one of them was made for about $300,000 with Prices salary at $100,000. Don’t know if thats true but I’m sure someone will tell me.
Rande…
---
### Author:  [@bobblehead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobblehead)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 8:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/36 "2003-01-12T20:13:50Z")
The original “Star Wars - A New Hope” was a very low budget film. George Lucas had very little money to make that film. I would say it’s in the top five for low-budget film.
---
### Author:  [@SC\_Wolf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SC_Wolf)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 9:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/37 "2003-01-12T21:20:14Z")
Everyone’s already said my favorites, so I’ll toss another one out there: _Swingers_. Any film that has to have a police lookout on all the exterior shots because the crew hasn’t secured the prerequisite filming permits has to count for something in this category.
Also, when Vince Vaughn later went to star on _Jurassic Park 2: The Lost World_, he was comparing film budgets with Spielburg one day on the set, and found out that the budget for _Swingers_ was less than the catering budget for _JP2_.
And then there’s always the original _Terminator_. While 6.4 million might seem decent, it was woefully small for a sci-fi actioner in 1984. The Budget was so low, the film’s audio as origionally released, was monophonic.
---
### Author:  [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 9:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/38 "2003-01-12T21:58:11Z")
Rainier Wolfcastle: The film is just me in front of a brick wall for an hour and a half. It cost $80 million.
---
### Author:  [@Wendell\_Wagner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wendell_Wagner)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 10:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/39 "2003-01-12T22:09:04Z")
I think people are blurring distinctions here. _Clerks_, _El Mariachi_, _The Blair Witch Project_ and _Slacker_ were ultra-low-budget films, although some of them required the distributors to spend $100,000 or so to clean them up before distributing them. _Swingers_, at $200,000 is at the low end of what’s traditionally thought of as low-budget filmmaking. _Star Wars_ at $11 million and _The Terminator_ at $6.4 million were moderate budget films. Something like _Jurassic Park: The Lost World_ at $73 million is at the low end of high-budget filmmaking.
---
### Author:  [@Jadis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jadis)
#### Post date: [January 12, 2003, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851/40 "2003-01-12T22:18:23Z")
I don’t know if this counts, considering the budget is listed on IMDB as $4.5mm, but I find **[Donnie Darko](http://us.imdb.com/Title?0246578)** to be an unbelievable flick. In the directory’s commentary, Richard Kelly remarks that a lot of the people who worked on the picture wound up not getting paid because the budget was so tight. They did the work only for the credit because they couldn’t resist working on the project.
[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851.md?page=1)
[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/top-five-no-budget-films/147851.md?page=3)