Unless this paragraph is triple-lacquered in irony, there really is no :rolleyes: big enough.
Trekkie was a fine and acceptable term. The insistence on Trekker is defensive and preposterous, especially given the fact that many years after its introduction, it still has not found a dominant foothold in the general public’s vernacular. They will always be Trekkies, regardless of how deep and wide their denial of this truth persists.
Trekkie was used in a dismissive, derisive, belittling way for so long that many fans came to hate the term. Hence Trekker. I’ll answer to either, but would prefer Trekker, if I had my druthers.
I soon expect to see fans of anthropomorphic animals dubbing themselves “furriers” and grownups who appreciate My Little Pony calling themselves “broners.”
I appear to have you confused with someone else. I may also have me confused for someone else.
Goes with the territory. “Gay” is a word used in a dismissive, derisive, and belittling way because the people who use it that way see “gays” as worthy of dismissal, derision, and belittling. Can’t change mindsets stepping around the word. Thus the comments above about the people opting for Trekker being afraid society will judge them for it. “I don’t want to be associated with them.”
I’m not really the convention type, but I went to one in the early 90’s with a friend who was seriously into it. I asked her the difference and she said:
A Trekkie will come to the convention wearing a set of Spock ears. A Trekker has had them surgically attached.
Just shows that people in both camps have tried to distance themselves from the obsessive fans, saying “No, they’re the obsessive ones, we’re the normal people who just like Star Trek”.
They would all drive their shuttle craft modifed Prius from their lo-do flats with full sized bridge displays, sipping green romulan tea and smearing themselves with patchouli warp core oil.