# Trial of Derek Chauvin (killer of George Floyd) outcome poll

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [April 19, 2021, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327 "2021-04-19T20:07:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nars\_Glinley](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nars_glinley/32/8177_2.png) [@Nars\_Glinley](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nars_Glinley)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/1 "2021-04-19T20:07:35Z")

</div>

The closing arguments in the trial of Derek Chauvin are currently being made by the defense. What do you believe will be the outcome of the trial?

_Poll ([view on site](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/1))_

Minnesota second and third degree murder definitions can be found [here.](https://statelaws.findlaw.com/minnesota-law/minnesota-second-degree-murder.html#:~:text=Minnesota%20law%20prohibits%20intentional%20and,attempting%20a%20drive%2Dby%20shooting)  
Second degree manslaughter defined [here.](https://www.legaldefensemn.com/sentences-manslaughter-minnesota/#:~:text=You%20could%20be%20charged%20with,then%20accidentally%20shoot%20someone%20dead.)  
Essentially, second degree murder is intentional killing but without premeditation. Third degree murder is placing another in eminent danger and disregarding human life. Second degree manslaughter is knowingly acting in a reckless behavior that leads to the death of another.

My guess is that he’s found guilty of third degree murder. I don’t know if Chauvin intentionally meant to kill Floyd or not but I believe that it would be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. IMO, it is indisputable that Chauvin placed Floyd in eminent danger and disregarded any actions that would have mitigated Floyd’s death.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 9:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/2 "2021-04-19T21:22:12Z")

</div>

It _should be_ at least 3rd degree murder. It probably _will be_ no more than manslaughter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/3 "2021-04-19T21:32:13Z")

</div>

Yeah, that’s my guess too. 3rd degree murder will be too hard to get full jury consensus on, so they’ll go with the lesser charge.

I’d be mightily surprised at an acquittal, but a hung jury always remains a possibility.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ParallelLines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/parallellines/32/3575_2.png) [@ParallelLines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParallelLines)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/4 "2021-04-19T21:43:54Z")

</div>

Sounds like I’m part of the choir. Based on the evidence seen so far by the general populace, manslaughter should be a slam dunk, 3rd degree murder is appropriate, and 2nd degree murder will be nearly impossible to get 100% of the jury behind. Based on the verdicts of other juries though, they’ll go with the second-degree manslaughter and feel that is good enough, even if third-degree murder seems to be fully justified as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mallard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9bd4f/32.png) [@Mallard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mallard)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 9:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/5 "2021-04-19T21:49:11Z")

</div>

There’s no planted gloves to try to put on Chauvin and fail. IMHO, there’s no way he’s acquitted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/6 "2021-04-19T21:55:48Z")

</div>

And yet even on this liberal-leaning board, we have people saying the prosecution didn’t prove its case:

> [@Minnesota trial of Derek Chauvin (killer of George Floyd) reactions](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/minnesota-trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-reactions/939024/491):
>
> Granting their transcription as reasonably accurate, I don’t think the state proved its case. That doesn’t mean Chauvin will be found not guilty, the jury has to know what is waiting for them if they don’t come up with the mob approved verdict, but the prosecution story leaves too many questions unanswered.
> 
> The defense closing story seems pretty straightforward. Floyd died not solely of officers’ actions but because he had a long list of medical and drug ailments that were aggravated by his choosing to fight with the officers.

How confident are you that among the 12 people on the jury, none of them share this opinion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/7 "2021-04-19T22:13:29Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> 3rd degree murder will be too hard to get full jury consensus on, so they’ll go with the lesser charge.
> 
> I’d be mightily surprised at an acquittal, but a hung jury always remains a possibility.

That’s where I am, too.

In my view the prosecution proved all three charges and it would be appropriate for the jury to find Chauvin guilty on all three. All the defense had was the self-contradictory claim that George Floyd was both on the point of death before Chauvin encountered him, AND so inhumanly strong that even though he was handcuffed and face-down, he was liable to leap up and slaughter all four police officers present (thus justifying Chauvin’s leaning on him for over nine minutes).

I can’t believe that any juror would have fallen for that defense—but then I find it hard to believe that any voter would have thought a certain someone would make a good President (I won’t derail the thread by being more specific).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ratatoskK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ratatoskk/32/2987_2.png) [@ratatoskK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ratatoskK)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/8 "2021-04-19T22:23:49Z")

</div>

I say guilty on all charges. (That wasn’t one of the choices in the poll.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mallard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9bd4f/32.png) [@Mallard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mallard)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/9 "2021-04-19T22:31:25Z")

</div>

> [@Minnesota trial of Derek Chauvin (killer of George Floyd) reactions](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/minnesota-trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-reactions/939024/491):
>
> And yet even on this liberal-leaning board, we have people saying the prosecution didn’t prove its case:
> 
> > [@Minnesota trial of Derek Chauvin (killer of George Floyd) reactions](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/minnesota-trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-reactions/939024/491):
> >
> > Granting their transcription as reasonably accurate, I don’t think the state proved its case. That doesn’t mean Chauvin will be found not guilty, the jury has to know what is waiting for them if they don’t come up with the mob approved verdict, but the prosecution story leaves too many questions unanswered.
> > 
> > The defense closing story seems pretty straightforward. Floyd died not solely of officers’ actions but because he had a long list of medical and drug ailments that were aggravated by his choosing to fight with the officers.
> 
> How confident are you that among the 12 people on the jury, none of them share this opinion?

Of course one cannot be certain the jury feels the same way but kneeling on the guy for 9 minutes long after he’s subdued and even 4 minutes after he’s dead is incredibly telling. And although I’m very “anti Trump”, I’m also about the last guy who would support any kind of “defund police” initiatives.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 10:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/10 "2021-04-19T22:39:22Z")

</div>

> [@TroutMan](#):
>
> How confident are you that among the 12 people on the jury, none of them share this opinion?

I don’t think any of them will find that exact logic convincing because it’s been made clear in the trial that it only needs to be proven that Chauvin was a “substantial causal factor” in Floyd’s death. Someone might doubt that Chauvin met that threshold, but just thinking that there could be other factors won’t be enough.

I do think there are a lot of reasons they could stop short of murder. I’m nervous about even predicting manslaughter given this country’s history with holding police accountable, but we’ve at least seen enough differences in this trial - particularly other police being willing to testify against their own.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/11 "2021-04-19T22:45:49Z")

</div>

I could tell you what I think he actually is guilty of (murder 3), but I’m hesitant to choose an option. I’d put the median on manslaughter, saying it could also go for murder 3 or not guilty. I also wouldn’t be surprised as a mistrial from one or more stubborn jurors. (I’d hope they’d bring a new trial.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gatopescado](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gatopescado/32/5711_2.png) [@Gatopescado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gatopescado)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/12 "2021-04-19T22:48:53Z")

</div>

Oops. Never mind. Wrong thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/13 "2021-04-19T22:49:09Z")

</div>

> [@ratatoskK](#):
>
> I say guilty on all charges. (That wasn’t one of the choices in the poll.)

Probably because it doesn’t make sense? I don’t think you can be guilty of two different types of murder for killing one person.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 11:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/14 "2021-04-19T23:27:00Z")

</div>

Out of curiosity: in theory, could the jury return a Guilty verdict on multiple charges? I agree that it would make no sense, but is it actually possible? And how much would that cause the system to go haywire?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2021, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/15 "2021-04-19T23:51:49Z")

</div>

I believe he could be guilty of multiple. It could wind up mattering if there is an appeal that vacates one conviction but not another. If multiple convictions stand, I think the sentences would be concurrent, so effectively a lesser conviction would have no effect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tatterdemalion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/43a26b/32.png) [@Tatterdemalion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tatterdemalion)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2021, 12:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/16 "2021-04-20T00:04:07Z")

</div>

There should have been an option for a mistrial. I think that’s what will happen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nars\_Glinley](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nars_glinley/32/8177_2.png) [@Nars\_Glinley](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nars_Glinley)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2021, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/17 "2021-04-20T00:16:52Z")

</div>

> [@Tatterdemalion](#):
>
> There should have been an option for a mistrial. I think that’s what will happen. -

I actually thought of that after I saved the OP but didn’t feel that it was right to add an option after some people had already voted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LivingGhost371](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/b9e5f3/32.png) [@LivingGhost371](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LivingGhost371)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2021, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/18 "2021-04-20T00:19:16Z")

</div>

Guilt on all three charges is allowed, but the sentences won’t stack.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LivingGhost371](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/b9e5f3/32.png) [@LivingGhost371](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LivingGhost371)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2021, 12:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/19 "2021-04-20T00:25:52Z")

</div>

> [@Nars\_Glinley](#):
>
> Essentially, second degree murder is intentional killing but without premeditation

That’s incorrect in this case. In Minnesota law we have two flavors of 2nd Degree Murder. The first is indeed an intentional, unpremeditated killing, but the second flavor is what’s called “2nd Degree Unintentional Murder”, which is what Chauvin is charged with. It’s similar in facts (although the punishment is a lot less) to what other states call “Felony Murder”. Proving intent is not required for the killing, although in this case the underlying felony, 3rd Degree Assault, requires intent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mallard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9bd4f/32.png) [@Mallard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mallard)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2021, 12:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327/20 "2021-04-20T00:32:19Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Out of curiosity: in theory, could the jury return a Guilty verdict on multiple charges? I agree that it would make no sense, but is it actually possible? And how much would that cause the system to go haywire?

Fair question. To me, American law has had some quirks that I’ve not understood. Such as someone getting a sentence of “life” in prison plus 20 years. It conjures up images of the rotting corpse left in the cell.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trial-of-derek-chauvin-killer-of-george-floyd-outcome-poll/940327.md?page=2)
