# Trite SDMB arguments and John McCain.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [April 7, 2008, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374 "2008-04-07T19:57:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 1:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/21 "2008-04-08T13:17:07Z")

</div>

I have no clue as to what the OP is going on about. But I would point out that who has/hasn’t served wasn’t really an issue in American politics until Republicans made a big deal in 1992 (and to a lesser extent 1996) about Clinton’s Vietnam-era avoidance of service.

If it’s somehow a moral failing to avoid serving, when capable, in wars one is opposed to, then it surely must be a greater moral failing to similarly avoid service in a war one supports.

The GOP got itself into this issue, and the GOP has no cause for complaint when it’s turned against their people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Moto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9de0a6/32.png) [@Mr.Moto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Moto)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 1:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/22 "2008-04-08T13:31:12Z")

</div>

I won’t particularly argue that point. But I will point out that while partisans of various stripes were yelling “draft-dodger” or “chickenhawk” those men won their respective elections - indicating that easy as these attacks might be to make, the American public as a whole does not care.

I have pointed that fact out numberless times as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 1:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/23 "2008-04-08T13:51:46Z")

</div>

In that case, why you opened this thread in the first place is totally opaque to me. You say the American people don’t care about this argument, and there doesn’t seem to be an opening to raise it in the coming campaign.

Yet it was important enough to you to raise - and to bring up the origins of the ‘chickenhawk’ argument in a misleading way, taking them only partway back. When you say “[w]hen these arguments came up in the past I tended to point out to Democrats that war heroes ran against Clinton twice, and that this didn’t seem to affect their vote at the time,” you conveniently omit those origins, and the Democrats’ motivation for venting about chickenhawks. War heroes ran against Clinton twice _while their surrogates were calling Clinton a draft dodger and a traitor_. It may not have affected the balance of the election, but it may well have made the election a good deal closer than it would have otherwise been, and energized and increased the numbers of those who effectively refused to accept the outcome. (Their President died a couple of days back.)

I think it’s important to understand these things, not just from the POV of who started this particular tit-for-tat, but in order to know what to expect this fall and next year. It goes without saying that we can look forward to months of attacks on Obama’s patriotism and manhood, because _that’s what the wingnut attack machine does_, finding different justifications every cycle. And you start an absurd thread about attacks that _aren’t_ going to happen, that you are bored with, but that you feel a need to raise anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 2:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/24 "2008-04-08T14:34:02Z")

</div>

I don’t think anyone thinks McCain is a chickenhawk. He is a warmonger. Quite different .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 2:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/25 "2008-04-08T14:34:13Z")

</div>

So… what attacks can we expect to see about McCain? Pandering to special interests, of course. He’s been doing a lot of that. Not a True Republican, but that was mostly primary season. He’s too much of a hawk, that might have legs, because the war is unpopular.

And, of course, age, age, and age. Change versus Experience.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AskNott](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asknott/32/5790_2.png) [@AskNott](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AskNott)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 2:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/26 "2008-04-08T14:36:59Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=John Mace]  
So, you think Pat Buchanan is good prognosticator? Or are you saying McCain would start a war with China…?  
[/QUOTE]

I’m saying you wouldn’t believe any left-wing sources I could have quoted, so I found some right-wingers’ writings on McCain’s views about solving things with war. I thought you might see them as kindred spirits. In a delightful surprise, you swept them aside. So, now you’re saying Bloomberg News is not a source you would trust. Hmmm, I wonder who **John Mace** sees as a teller of truth?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 3:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/27 "2008-04-08T15:03:53Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=AskNott]  
I’m saying you wouldn’t believe any left-wing sources I could have quoted, so I found some right-wingers’ writings on McCain’s views about solving things with war. I thought you might see them as kindred spirits. In a delightful surprise, you swept them aside. So, now you’re saying Bloomberg News is not a source you would trust. Hmmm, I wonder who **John Mace** sees as a teller of truth?  
[/QUOTE]

When predicting the future, I don’t see anyone as a “teller of truth”.

Pat Buchanan\* is not an unbiased observer, and I don’t know what it means to be “hawkish” on China. I’ll ask again: Is McCain going to start a war with China? Is he going to take any military action against China? I highly doubt that.

\*and calling him “right wing” in the sense that McCain is “right wing” is nonsense. They aren’t in the same wing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/28 "2008-04-08T16:26:45Z")

</div>

Ah, so no one actually has made these charges. **Mr. Moto** must have just misspoke.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 4:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/29 "2008-04-08T16:40:28Z")

</div>

[http://rawstory.com/news/2008/McCain\_camp\_lashes\_out\_at\_reports\_0408.html](http://rawstory.com/news/2008/McCain_camp_lashes_out_at_reports_0408.html) McCain is a hotheaded jerk. Here is a story about a fist fight he had in congress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/30 "2008-04-08T16:42:28Z")

</div>

[http://rawstory.com/news/2008/McCain\_temper\_boiled\_over\_in\_92\_0407.html](http://rawstory.com/news/2008/McCain_temper_boiled_over_in_92_0407.html) Heres another one when he called his wife a cunt. He is so presidential His temper has been covered a long time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 4:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/31 "2008-04-08T16:51:47Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=John Mace]  
…Pat Buchanan\* is not an unbiased observer, and I don’t know what it means to be “hawkish” on China. I’ll ask again: Is McCain going to start a war with China? Is he going to take any military action against China? I highly doubt that…  
[/QUOTE]

Not the point, **John**. More to the point is McCain’s “military mind set”, the tendency of hammers to view all problems as nails.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/32 "2008-04-08T16:52:33Z")

</div>

I read it on the internet, so it must be true!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 4:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/33 "2008-04-08T16:56:43Z")

</div>

Yeppers, that would be be me all right, **John**. A cross of naive ignorance and dark cynicism, sort of a _Pollyanna Karinina_.

Comments of substance to follow?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/34 "2008-04-08T16:57:23Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=elucidator]  
Not the point, **John**. More to the point is McCain’s “military mind set”, the tendency of hammers to view all problems as nails.  
[/QUOTE]

I don’t know that he has a “military mindset”. I think that’s a rather superficial characterization of him. He’s been in Congress longer than he was in the military, so maybe he has a “Congressional mindset”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/35 "2008-04-08T16:58:27Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=elucidator]  
Yeppers, that would be be me all right, **John**. A cross of naive ignorance and dark cynicism, sort of a _Pollyanna Karinina_.

Comments of substance to follow?  
[/QUOTE]

When he comes up with a cite of substance, I’ll give a comment of substance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/36 "2008-04-08T17:01:13Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=John Mace]  
I read it on the internet, so it must be true!  
[/QUOTE]  
[Someone is wrong on the Internet.](http://xkcd.com/386/) 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/37 "2008-04-08T17:04:55Z")

</div>

If McCain’s military career was not such a formative and defining thing, why is it that he talks about it nearly incessantly? Why does he offer it as his foremost qualification? As much as I admire his principles when he refused early release, how does being shot down and subsequently mistreated add geopolitical credentials?

As I’ve said before, I get the feeling that McCain is running to be Commander in Chief rather than running for President.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mswas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e99b99/32.png) [@mswas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mswas)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/38 "2008-04-08T17:10:20Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=elucidator]  
If McCain’s military career was not such a formative and defining thing, why is it that he talks about it nearly incessantly? Why does he offer it as his foremost qualification? As much as I admire his principles when he refused early release, how does being shot down and subsequently mistreated add geopolitical credentials?

As I’ve said before, I get the feeling that McCain is running to be Commander in Chief rather than running for President.  
[/QUOTE]

You could make the same argument re Obama and Head of State.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/39 "2008-04-08T18:06:16Z")

</div>

I was against waterboarding before I was for it. McCain

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2008, 6:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374/40 "2008-04-08T18:15:47Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=elucidator]  
If McCain’s military career was not such a formative and defining thing, why is it that he talks about it nearly incessantly?  
[/quote]

“Incessantly” is a pretty vague term. I’m not sure that he talks about his military career more than he talks about his Congressional experience. But if you’ve got proof, I’m open to hearing it. Sure, he talks about it a lot… but more than, say, Kerry did?

> [@](#):
>
> Why does he offer it as his foremost qualification?

Does he?

> [@](#):
>
> As I’ve said before, I get the feeling that McCain is running to be Commander in Chief rather than running for President.

I’m sure he considers that an important aspect of the job, but I can’t say that I’ve even seen him say or imply that it’s the most important thing.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trite-sdmb-arguments-and-john-mccain/444374.md?page=3)
