# Trolls R Us Resurrections (Part 1)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [September 11, 2021, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518 "2021-09-11T17:26:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 104

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 10:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6540 "2022-07-19T22:24:20Z")

</div>

> [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
>
> But I also think that people who are misrepresenting themselves as PhDs will pretty quickly be spotted.

You’re right, claiming a PhD will probably be found out quickly when the topic involves objectively falsifiable information. My school board example is better because those kind of falsehoods are much more difficult to detect. So I’m grateful the mods take a hard line when the liars are exposed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6541 "2022-07-19T22:47:45Z")

</div>

I’ve never lied about anything about myself. Here or elsewhere. It’s an asshole thing to do.

> [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
>
> But for misrepresenting themselves? I do it all the time. On purpose. I overstate my involvement in some things, and I understate my involvement in other things. I change details. Sometimes they’re intentionally mutually exclusive. Why? To keep internet sleuths from putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with me.

If you are just making up garbage on purpose, you’re being an asshole. Don’t do that.

Saying you’re doing it to prevent doxxing is a bullshit excuse. To prevent that, just don’t provide personal info. I try to be cagey at times about some of my personal info because of that. But I don’t lie. I don’t misrepresent myself. Assholes do that. Don’t be an asshole.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6542 "2022-07-19T22:51:17Z")

</div>

I sort of feel like **[that article](https://www.sarasotamagazine.com/news-and-profiles/2022/07/martin-hyde-sarasota)** (who posted it – @hajario ?) has a really high likelihood of _being_ Our Boy, Martin. At the very least, there’s no way that I’d bet _against_ it being him.

For those with 15-ish minutes to spare, watch the video in the article. I can just see him on a comparable rant here.

If I had zero context for that article and video, incidentally, my first reaction would have been “Wow. What a totally entitled, narcissistic asshole !”

QED 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreysonCarlisle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a87d85/32.png) [@GreysonCarlisle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreysonCarlisle)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 10:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6543 "2022-07-19T22:59:10Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> If you are just making up garbage on purpose, you’re being an asshole. Don’t do that.

I’ll do what I see fit, thanks.

> [@](#):
>
> Saying you’re doing it to prevent doxxing is a bullshit excuse.

It’s really not.

If you can find examples where I made up things to win an argument or to show just how awesome I am, then you’d have grounds for calling me an asshole.

But obfuscating some details? That’s a whole 'nuther thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 11:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6544 "2022-07-19T23:00:07Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> If you are just making up bullshit on purpose, you’re being an asshole. Don’t do that.

Yes, and it also distorts serious discussions, as TroutMan and others have noted. Myself, I don’t tend to feel personally betrayed or anything if an anonymous stranger on a messageboard turns out to have been lying about their life experience to impress people or just for the lulz, but when the lies are presented as something germane to the discussion topic, that just wastes everybody’s time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6545 "2022-07-19T23:13:38Z")

</div>

> [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
>
> But obfuscating some details? That’s a whole 'nuther thing.

“Obfuscating some details” isn’t what we’re talking about here. Making up who you are from whole cloth like MH did, that’s different.

We had an infamous case of this sort of thing over on Wikipedia, and it was a big deal. _The New Yorker_ was even hoodwinked by it.

> **[Essjay controversy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essjay_controversy)**
>
> The Essjay controversy was an incident in which Ryan Jordan, a Wikipedia editor who went by the username "Essjay", falsely presented himself as a university professor of religion from 2005 to 2007, during which time he was elected to top positions of trust by the community, including administrator and arbitrator. In July 2006, The New Yorker published an article about "Essjay", and mentioned that he was a university professor of religion. The New Yorker later acknowledged that they did not know...

> [@Kimstu](#):
>
> Myself, I don’t tend to feel personally betrayed or anything if an anonymous stranger on a messageboard turns out to have been lying about their life experience to impress people or just for the lulz, but when the lies are presented as something germane to the discussion topic, that just wastes everybody’s time.

Absolutely it does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreysonCarlisle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a87d85/32.png) [@GreysonCarlisle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreysonCarlisle)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6546 "2022-07-19T23:17:38Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> > [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
> >
> > But obfuscating some details? That’s a whole 'nuther thing.
> 
> “Obfuscating some details” isn’t what we’re talking about here.

Well, that’s what I presented, and you called me an asshole for it.

> [@](#):
>
> Making up who you are from whole cloth like MH did, that’s different.

Yeah, but I still believe that, on a board that loves nothing so much as a good nitpick, the fakers will be quickly outed as such, and their credibility will be destroyed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6547 "2022-07-19T23:25:40Z")

</div>

> [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
>
> Well, that’s what I presented, and you called me an asshole for it.

Sorry, I think I misinterpreted what you were saying then.

> [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
>
> Yeah, but I still believe that, on a board that loves nothing so much as a good nitpick, the fakers will be quickly outed as such, and their credibility will be destroyed.

I would like to think so, but Martin lasted 18 years. I don’t know how long in particular he got away with his specific claims, but it doesn’t seem to be quick.

It’s especially difficult when you have two people both claiming to be an expert on a topic, each one claiming the other is full of it. Let’s say that one is making up garbage, and the other one is truly an expert. Unless you have a bunch of experts to verify each other via consensus it’s difficult to tell who is correct. Sure, you can pull out cites, but there are people who are skilled with search engines that can cherry pick enough verifiable information on a subject to make their argument plausible. Sometimes it’s not easy.

Anonymity does have its downsides.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreysonCarlisle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a87d85/32.png) [@GreysonCarlisle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreysonCarlisle)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6548 "2022-07-19T23:29:11Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> > [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
> >
> > Well, that’s what I presented, and you called me an asshole for it.
> 
> Sorry, I think I misinterpreted what you were saying then.

Fair enough. No harm, no foul.

> [@](#):
>
> I would like to think so, but Martin lasted 18 years. I don’t know how long he specifically got away with his specific claims, but it doesn’t seem to be quick.

Which is another reason I’m against the rule against misrepresentation. If it’s going to take two decades to discover the fact (and how would you prove it, anyway?), then what’s the point?

> [@](#):
>
> It’s especially difficult when you have two people both claiming to be an expert on a topic, each one claiming the other is full of it.

Very true. Personally, I consider the Dope to be but one source. Anything that I need to know (or am very curious about), I try to verify those claims elsewhere. Which is why I absolutely adore our culture of giving cites.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![raventhief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/raventhief/32/4_2.png) [@raventhief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/raventhief)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 11:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6549 "2022-07-19T23:31:46Z")

</div>

What a piece of shit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![puzzlegal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/puzzlegal/32/3827_2.png) [@puzzlegal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/puzzlegal)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6550 "2022-07-19T23:34:02Z")

</div>

I mean, there are lies and lies. If i say i was elected to a school board, and this was my experience, that’s a material lie. If i say i live in upstate new York, and i really live in Pennsylvania, then… really, who cares. Just make sure you look up the details when you talk about your traffic laws and your liquor laws, as they are different in those two states.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2022, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6551 "2022-07-19T23:53:10Z")

</div>

> [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
>
> Which is another reason I’m against the rule against misrepresentation. If it’s going to take two decades to discover the fact (and how would you prove it, anyway?), then what’s the point?

I think the fact it’s difficult to expose them is precisely why we need harsh penalties. There needs to be real risk to it.

And I’m not sure why you’re opposed to getting rid of them anyway. In what way is this community improved by having people around whose credibility has been destroyed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreysonCarlisle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a87d85/32.png) [@GreysonCarlisle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreysonCarlisle)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2022, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6552 "2022-07-20T00:19:41Z")

</div>

> [@TroutMan](#):
>
> And I’m not sure why you’re opposed to getting rid of them anyway. In what way is this community improved by having people around whose credibility has been destroyed?

There are a fair number of people I wouldn’t really want around here, but I don’t support bullshit reasons for getting rid of them. The misrepresentation rule is vague and virtually unenforceable for most posters, so it is bullshit. The stolen valor argument is bullshit on the face of it. And I still don’t believe that much of anybody can speak with authority here without being challenged. So that’s bullshit, too.

Ban them for trolling if that’s what they’re doing, but don’t look for some gotcha in the rules.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TokyoBayer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tokyobayer/32/13989_2.png) [@TokyoBayer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TokyoBayer)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2022, 12:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6553 "2022-07-20T00:23:57Z")

</div>

Like most everyone else, there are details which could potentially out me, and I’ve stayed away from threads that could, or was just vague.

I just presumed that was the norm rather than make up false details.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![steronz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steronz/32/11765_2.png) [@steronz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/steronz)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2022, 12:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6554 "2022-07-20T00:29:01Z")

</div>

Help me understand exactly what you’re talking about. Like, let’s say you have a degree in ME from Purdue, and you want to weigh in on a structural engineering thread. Do you:

A) Tell people you have an electrical engineering degree from Georgia Tech in order to obfuscate the details of your personal life, or  
B) Just say “I have a mechanical engineering degree” and omit the irrelevant information that might personally identify you.

In all my years of posting on the internet it’s never occurred to me to _change_ details of my life, versus just omitting information that I don’t want to share.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2022, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6555 "2022-07-20T00:36:44Z")

</div>

> [@Atamasama](#):
>
> I would like to think so, but Martin lasted 18 years. I don’t know how long in particular he got away with his specific claims, but it doesn’t seem to be quick.

Well, IIRC most of what he posted wasn’t significantly about his own personal experience. Most of his autobiographical fabrications seem to have been essentially just a lazy way to sound more authoritative about a particular topic without having to provide actual cites and evidence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2022, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6556 "2022-07-20T00:41:11Z")

</div>

> [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
>
> There are a fair number of people I wouldn’t really want around here, but I don’t support bullshit reasons for getting rid of them.

You’re ducking the question. How does it improve our community to keep these people around? If there’s no answer to that, then it isn’t a “bullshit reason.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreysonCarlisle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a87d85/32.png) [@GreysonCarlisle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreysonCarlisle)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2022, 12:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6557 "2022-07-20T00:42:52Z")

</div>

> [@TroutMan](#):
>
> You’re ducking the question. How does it improve our community to keep these people around? If there’s no answer to that, then it isn’t a “bullshit reason.”

I’m not ducking anything. If we’re only going to keep people around who “improve the community”, then that will change the entire culture here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2022, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6558 "2022-07-20T00:56:13Z")

</div>

> [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
>
> There are a fair number of people I wouldn’t really want around here, but I don’t support bullshit reasons for getting rid of them. The misrepresentation rule is vague and virtually unenforceable for most posters, so it is bullshit.

What was “vague” or “unenforceable” about the mods’ application of the misrepresentation rule to Martin\_Hyde, for example?

If what you’re trying to say is that most instances of autobiographical fuzziness or inconsistency by posters would not be considered serious or indisputable enough to fall foul of the misrepresentation rule, ISTM that that’s a feature, not a bug.

I don’t want SDMB Auskunftspersonen snooping around in posters’ private lives searching for every tiny little inconsistency in their posted descriptions. But I want there to be a baseline rule that says that holding yourself out to be something you’re not, for the purpose of persuading people that you know what you’re talking about with reference to a particular subject, is not allowed. And when somebody evidently and egregiously violates that rule, there’s nothing “bullshit” about kicking them out.

> [@GreysonCarlisle](#):
>
> > [@TroutMan](#):
> >
> > How does it improve our community to keep these people around? If there’s no answer to that, then it isn’t a “bullshit reason.”
> 
> […] If we’re only going to keep people around who “improve the community”, then that will change the entire culture here.

You’re talking at cross-purposes. TroutMan is saying that there’s no need to repeal an existing rule about banning posters for a specific kind of misbehavior, since repealing it wouldn’t improve the community.

You’re saying that we should not implement a rule that any poster who doesn’t improve the community should be banned.

Those two statements are not mutually exclusive or in any way contradictory.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [July 20, 2022, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518/6559 "2022-07-20T01:00:44Z")

</div>

When you gave your opinion on stolen valor, you mentioned that you were in the military. Why would you do that if you didn’t think that it lent weight to your opinion?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518.md?page=103)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trolls-r-us-resurrections-part-1/950518.md?page=105)
