# Trump addresses Congress (2-28)- Doper real-time commentary thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [February 28, 2017, 1:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029 "2017-02-28T13:48:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![QuickSilver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quicksilver/32/7832_2.png) [@QuickSilver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/QuickSilver)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 3:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/121 "2017-03-01T15:20:28Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> My main point is that this rhetorical shift (unless it totally reverses) shows that the ACA really was a game-changer, and an enormous progressive success. Even if it’s repealed, some of its most important elements will probably stick around for good, at least based on Republican rhetoric.

I agree that it will be nearly impossible for this (or any) administration to put the worms back in the can with respect to ACA. It is, by almost any measure, a successful healthcare policy. But I don’t believe the Republicans are capable of improving those areas that need improving. I think they are more likely to break key parts having mostly to do with what makes it affordable for people at higher health risk and pre-existing conditions.

Their promises to lower premiums to make it more affordable simply don’t match up with their premise of not requiring all Americans to purchase health insurance. Nor do I believe they will be effective in negotiating lower drug, healthcare and health insurance costs nationally without ensuring a larger customer base. To do the latter, they will need to expand ACA. Something that is in contrast to their rhetoric to date.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skammer/32/143_2.png) [@Skammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skammer)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 3:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/122 "2017-03-01T15:24:38Z")

</div>

There were two things Trump said that I can get behind.

First, if my ears didn’t deceive me, he called for paid family leave for all working Americans. The Republicans in Congress probably choked a bit on that one, and will pretend it was never said, but he’s right. I suspect Ivanka of sneaking that in there.

I forget what the other one was. The big infrastructure spending might be good, depending how it’s implemented. It might also be a massive handout to his industrial tycoon friends.

It still pisses me off to no end how he continues to scapegoat immigrants for terrorism. He named a bunch of attacks to justify his travel restrictions, failing to note that none of those attackers came from any of the countries he is targeting. Again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skammer/32/143_2.png) [@Skammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skammer)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 3:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/123 "2017-03-01T15:26:38Z")

</div>

Oh right, big tax cuts for everyone, plus massive military spending increases. Yeah that worked really well when GWB did it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/124 "2017-03-01T15:29:51Z")

</div>

> [@QuickSilver](#):
>
> I agree that it will be nearly impossible for this (or any) administration to put the worms back in the can with respect to ACA. It is, by almost any measure, a successful healthcare policy. But I don’t believe the Republicans are capable of improving those areas that need improving. I think they are more likely to break key parts having mostly to do with what makes it affordable for people at higher health risk and pre-existing conditions.
> 
> Their promises to lower premiums to make it more affordable simply don’t match up with their premise of not requiring all Americans to purchase health insurance. Nor do I believe they will be effective in negotiating lower drug, healthcare and health insurance costs nationally without ensuring a larger customer base. To do the latter, they will need to expand ACA. Something that is in contrast to their rhetoric to date.

I agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![QuickSilver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quicksilver/32/7832_2.png) [@QuickSilver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/QuickSilver)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 3:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/125 "2017-03-01T15:30:34Z")

</div>

> [@Okrahoma](#):
>
> Once again, just like numerous times before - Trump says something, his haters interpret it to mean something else, and attack the strawman.

The same can be said for Trump apologists - Trump can say or do no wrong and everything deplorable is immediately forgiven and forgotten.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 4:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/126 "2017-03-01T16:41:57Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> His [words on the ACA](http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/2/28/14772616/trump-speech-congress-obamacare) demonstrate, to me, at least, that progressives are on the cusp of a total philosophical victory on the issue of health care – a Republican President, cheered by a Republican Congress, is essentially admitting that the government should guarantee access to health care for all Americans.

Sure… _because people are watching_. When the spotlight moves elsewhere, fuck all that commie shit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TruCelt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/trucelt/32/523_2.png) [@TruCelt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TruCelt)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/127 "2017-03-01T17:14:36Z")

</div>

> [@Shoeless](#):
>
> Do we get to make fun of him for using a teleprompter? I seem to remember not too long ago that it was a point of scorn and ridicule from the GOP when Obama did it. Or is that another “It’s OK if Republicans do it” thing?

People have been wondering if maybe he can’t read. He needed to prove that he can.

> [@Stalky](#):
>
> He seemed to choke on them a bit.
> 
> Should have practiced his speech a bit harder.

According to some reports, that was a nostalgic “Goodbye”, because its the last time H.R. McMaster is going to let him say it.

> [@Skammer](#):
>
> . . .
> 
> It still pisses me off to no end how he continues to scapegoat immigrants for terrorism. He named a bunch of attacks to justify his travel restrictions, failing to note that none of those attackers came from any of the countries he is targeting. Again.

That was the closest we’re going to get to a retraction and correction of the Sweden gaffe. He needed to show that he can, in fact use Google and find some true occurrences to cite.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![purplehearingaid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7bcc69/32.png) [@purplehearingaid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/purplehearingaid)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 5:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/128 "2017-03-01T17:18:55Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> 16? Where do you get beyond 4-8?

It’s going to feel like 16 years if Trump win in 2020 ! :eek:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/129 "2017-03-01T17:35:39Z")

</div>

> [@ThelmaLou](#):
>
> I agree that even getting the Republicans to address health care at all is a victory, of sorts. But the word they keep leaving out is **affordable**. People can have all the access in the world, but if they can’t afford the coverage, it’s the same as having \*\*no \*\*access.
> 
> Now where have I heard that word…? Hmmm… _\<scratches head\>_ Oh yeah: \*\*Affordable \*\*Care Act.

He did mention affordability.

> [@](#):
>
> I am also calling on this Congress to repeal and replace Obamacare with reforms that expand choice, increase access,\*\* lower costs,\*\* and at the same time, provide better Healthcare.  
> Mandating every American to buy government-approved health insurance was never the right solution for America. The way to make health insurance available to everyone is to \*\*lower the cost of health insurance, \*\*and that is what we will do.
> 
> … Fourthly, we should implement legal reforms that protect patients and doctors from unnecessary costs that drive up the price of insurance – and\*\* work to bring down the artificially high price of drugs and bring them down immediately.\*\*  
> Finally, the time has come to give Americans the freedom to purchase health insurance across State lines — creating a truly competitive national marketplace that will **bring cost way down** and provide far better care.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Doctor\_Jackson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doctor_jackson/32/32_2.png) [@Doctor\_Jackson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Doctor_Jackson)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 5:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/130 "2017-03-01T17:58:19Z")

</div>

Here’s [CNN’s](http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/28/politics/trump-speech-fact-check/index.html) take on the truthfulness of Trump’s claims so far:

9 claims vetted  
1 True  
2 Mostly true  
5 true but misleading  
1 False

I’d say that’s about par for the course for a politician, especially since the middle categories require some measure of subjectivity on behalf of the vetter. I honestly figured it would be much worse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 6:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/131 "2017-03-01T18:43:05Z")

</div>

Trump tweet: I almost think that were I to win some small success now I could become Dictator or anything else that might please me—but nothing of that kind would please me—therefore I won’t be Dictator. Admirable self-denial!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZipperJJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zipperjj/32/211_2.png) [@ZipperJJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZipperJJ)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 6:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/132 "2017-03-01T18:44:11Z")

</div>

One of the main things I got out of his speech, from between all the puffery, is that he’s going to get rid of all the illegal immigrants and then lower unemployment by opening up a bunch of low-paying jobs that can’t possibly provide any sort of meaningful “living” by modern standards.

Basically how things are now, but with more berry picking involved.

Keep the rich rich by not raising the minimum wage, create tons of low-paid jobs, cut welfare spending, make goods more expensive by adding tariffs or having them made in America (by low-paid workers), eviscerate the middle class completely.

Also is anyone else frustrated by the sentiments of how many college degrees are laughable (like liberal arts degrees) because “Oh, you’ll never get a job!” but as soon as people say they want to have a career in a dying and environmentally-raping field that is coal mining the government is now like “Yes, let us change some laws to get that opportunity for you!”

Mind-boggling and sad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 6:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/133 "2017-03-01T18:51:03Z")

</div>

> [@Doctor\_Jackson](#):
>
> Here’s [CNN’s](http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/28/politics/trump-speech-fact-check/index.html) take on the truthfulness of Trump’s claims so far:
> 
> 9 claims vetted
> 
> 1 True
> 
> 2 Mostly true
> 
> 5 true but misleading
> 
> 1 False
> 
> I’d say that’s about par for the course for a politician, especially since the middle categories require some measure of subjectivity on behalf of the vetter. I honestly figured it would be much worse.

“True but misleading” is the bread and butter of our elected politicians. Heck, taking something true and spinning it so that you can claim it supports your point is an everyday thing in politics and business and even personal relationships.

For instance, yes, the murder rate had its highest _relative_ increase… from 4.5/100,000 to 4.9/100,000 , so it’s a 10% increase but NOT an increase of ten percentage points, it puts us at the levels if the late 50s/early 60s and it’s still half what it was in 1991 (9.8) and less than half the 1980 peak(10.2). So people on one side will argue it’s just a blip and shows overall crime remains low except for some bad hotspots… and those on the other side will say if those hotspots are so bad they’re moving the overall average then you gotta crack down.

The problem with him is that he wildly overstates when he does not need to overstate, he seems organically incapable of the subtle misdirection. Which often makes mere spin and baldfaced fabrication indistinguishable, coming from him.

Here is where sticking to the script helps – so there were no “Sweden last night” random blurt-outs for no reason, but he did massage the facts (or grabbed them by you know where) when it was useful to push the agenda, as slimy pols will do. Good to see you fitting right in the swamp, Donnie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snarky\_Kong](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a183cd/32.png) [@Snarky\_Kong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snarky_Kong)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 7:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/134 "2017-03-01T19:20:15Z")

</div>

Why aren’t people cheering Trump saying crime is bad? I dunno, because his campaign was full of racism and lies about crime and that his solutions to his fake problems are authoritarian.

Why aren’t they cheering about saying we should support NATO? Because Trump has undercut NATO for a year, and he’s lying about it now.

It’s not an ad hominem to take into account context.

If David Duke is talking about how many black people were killed, do you stand up and cheer that he’s taking on an important issue, or recognize his loathsome motives?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jshore](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b5e925/32.png) [@jshore](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jshore)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 7:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/135 "2017-03-01T19:54:23Z")

</div>

> [@Tim\_R.Mortiss](#):
>
> But I did stand up and cheer at two things he said, which Obama would NEVER have uttered even if you put his dick in a bunsen burner:
> 
> 1. Radical Islamic Terror
> 
> 2. America First!!

Well, you standing up and cheering might reveal more about your failings than Obama’s. [Even Trump’s new National Security Advisor advises against using the term.](http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/mcmaster-trump-terrorism-speech-235476)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThelmaLou](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thelmalou/32/390_2.png) [@ThelmaLou](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThelmaLou)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/136 "2017-03-01T20:12:35Z")

</div>

So this time Uncle Harold came to Sunday dinner WITHOUT his underpants on his head and we’re ready to declare him _normal_?

The bar is so low that the fact that Trump didn’t make an idiot of himself (IOW did not behave like himself) is cause for general celebration. Sad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Ace](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/6bbea6/32.png) [@Johnny\_Ace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Ace)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 8:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/137 "2017-03-01T20:16:10Z")

</div>

> [@ThelmaLou](#):
>
> So this time Uncle Harold came to Sunday dinner WITHOUT his underpants on his head and we’re ready to declare him _normal_?
> 
> The bar is so low that the fact that Trump didn’t make an idiot of himself (IOW did not behave like himself) is cause for general celebration. Sad.

Totally. What bothers me is (if the poll is true) the 25% or so who are ready to do an about-face because he read a teleprompted speech written by someone else without stepping on his dick.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jshore](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b5e925/32.png) [@jshore](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jshore)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 8:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/138 "2017-03-01T20:20:22Z")

</div>

> [@ZipperJJ](#):
>
> Also is anyone else frustrated by the sentiments of how many college degrees are laughable (like liberal arts degrees) because “Oh, you’ll never get a job!” but as soon as people say they want to have a career in a dying and environmentally-raping field that is coal mining the government is now like “Yes, let us change some laws to get that opportunity for you!”

And, of course, changing the laws will do more to hurt than environment than they will to help the miners, since a lot of the jobs have been lost to automation. (Also, market forces such as the cheapness of natural gas…but for that, changing the laws will probably just have little effect on the environment or the jobs.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jshore](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b5e925/32.png) [@jshore](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jshore)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 8:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/139 "2017-03-01T20:25:21Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> He did mention affordability.

Yes…He did mention it. But he does not seem to have any particularly realistic plan to address it and, in fact, getting rid of the mandate so that you don’t have young healthy people in the insurance pool will do just the opposite. [Here](https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2016/10/10/sorry-trump-selling-health-insurance-across-state-lines-wouldnt-lower-costs/#36c9390c1514), for example, is a discussion of his notion about selling insurance across state lines.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [March 1, 2017, 8:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029/140 "2017-03-01T20:28:42Z")

</div>

> [@purplehearingaid](#):
>
> It’s going to feel like 16 years if Trump win in 2020 ! :eek:

It already does.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029.md?page=6)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-addresses-congress-2-28-doper-real-time-commentary-thread/781029.md?page=8)
