Context, but you knew that already, so thanks for showing all what a willful ignorant you are by not being aware of who are you defending.
I’m sure he would be happy to debate against your side on the topic of climate change given the chance.
So the only moron here is you trying to stick that climaphobe label and using dumbspeak to witness in favor of science.
No, he’d just lie; not "debate. Being a right winger he was by nature utterly incapable of honesty, just like you. The Right is consistently wrong and dishonest, about everything; if a right winger says something you can assume it to be wrong. Otherwise they wouldn’t be saying it.
Well, thanks for admitting that besides being an ignorant of the harmful legacy Kirk left, you are only telling us now the type of coward you are. It is the living who has to follow the footsteps of others. It is not my problem if the one you are defending is leading you to a precipice.
Charlie Kirk was correct about everything he said about vaccines. As Kirk said, vaccines are safe and effective and do not cause Autism. Kirk was often heard to say ‘Tylenol causes Autism’.
DoubleplusgoodTrump Winston Crow, here’s an extra Victory Gin Trump Victory Vodka voucher.
Not what he was, he seeded doubts about covid and vaccine mandates, any recent changes were more lies as he did not mind much what was going on with Kennedy.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/07/29/vaccine-mandates-charlie-kirk-tpusa/
I mean, you have to be a performance act at this point, right? You need to keep it believable friend.
You are not my friend, or anyone’s friend. Rightwingers are the enemies of everyone and everything.
Except that his (and the entire right-wing’s) criticism of racial quotas and DEI is entirely based on the premise that black people are inherently inferior and underqualified compared to their white (and male and straight and Christian) counterparts, as all the context (you know, that thing you keep telling us is important) indicates.
We keep getting told that DEI and racial quotas result in underqualified minorities taking jobs away from more qualified white men, but the reality borne out by long history is that DEI and racial quotas are in place to stop underqualified white men from taking jobs away from more qualified minorities. Which is why the right, the bastion of mediocre white men with an undeserved sense of aggrieved entitlement, oppose DEI and racial quotas so vigorously.
But of course you know all this. And are absolutely fine with it. As was Kirk. Which is why he said all those racist and sexist things.
There’s that projection again.
There was an early reply that somehow was referring to you, the actual reply was going to be this one:
I understand where are you coming from, but I reply not only to him, but to others, and not only that, it is also so I do learn too…
I was aware of Kirk and his lies about white replacement, and other bigoted points. But, I was not aware until now, thanks to more searches, about what a monumental tool he was. Still, it was bad that he was shot, but instead of receiving some privacy, Trump and others had to call attention to his legacy. Of course, they still think that legacy is the best thing since sliced bread, but calling attention only pointed at how antiscience and hateful their ignorance was and is.
So after looking at the context, Kirk’s legacy ended up like Rush Limbaugh, who convinced others to ditch masks and vaccines and leading to more than 4 other right wing radio hosts to pay the ultimate price.
Also, it was bad that he was shot, but instead of receiving some privacy, Trump and others had to turn his death into a three-ring circus featuring shit flinging monkeys on meth.
After your side got the peaceful political activist brutally murdered with your unhinged and violent rhetoric and constant use of intimidation tactics you also wanted these people to go slink away quietly into obscurity and not bother you with all that pesky memorializing for the well respected member of their political movement.
In the name of all right wingers everywhere I would like to publicly apologize for the inconvenience this caused you.
There’s that projection again.
I know that no left-wing send-off for dearly departed figures is complete without a few billion dollars in property damage but we did the best we could with the time available.
Remind me what the history of having pyrotechnic displays at wakes is again?
And there’s that brain rot again.
I know that no right-wing rhetoric is complete without lies, hypocrisy and outright delusion but we know you did the best you can.
I heard that they burnt down entire cities right here on this board!
And I’m still waiting for octopus to present cites that prove it.
Demonstrably untrue, as can be seen by anyone reading this thread over the past week or so. At least so far. You are free to go back and actually address any of those unanswered posts just to prove us wrong but you don’t.
Here’s another question you probably won’t answer: what currency are you paid at your job? Dollars? Euros? Rubles? Renminbi?
Whereas the violent insurrectionists that attacked the Capitol on January 6 were just peaceful tourists who walked right in. The 140 police officers injured (some quite seriously) and the $1.5million in damage were all coincidental.
Mind you, if one wanted to view “unhinged and violent rhetoric and constant use of intimidation tactics” one couldn’t do much better than the reaction of the right to Kirk’s murder from the moment he died, long before the shooter and his motives were identified. But that’s not part of the context we’re supposed to consider.
Nor are we supposed to remember the right-wing shootings of the Hortmanns in Minnesota nor the attack on Paul Pelosi nor the attempted kidnapping of Gretchen Whitman nor the reaction of Trump and the right to all of those. And we’re certainly not supposed to remember that the same day Kirk was shot a far-right shooter with antisemitic and neo-Nazi views shot up a school in Colorado and the right said exactly nothing about it, presumably because they only care about “antisemitism” when they can use it as an excuse to suppress dissent.
No, only the official Trumpian narrative matters. And if it’s the opposite of what it was yesterday, you must be remembering incorrectly.
Is it possible that this account was made in 2000, was inactive for a long while, and only now has “Pedro” started posting again….? 
My understanding is that long dormant accounts don’t go away, they just float there, unused but still usable. Food for thought.