# Trump as Speaker of the House...need not even win an election

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [July 22, 2021, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020 "2021-07-22T01:07:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2022, 3:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/101 "2022-11-10T15:33:56Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> Politics is about aligning your interests with the interests of other people. Successful politicians are people who can make deals with other people saying _“You do this to help me and I will do this to help you.”_

Republicans don’t do that anymore. Indeed, they are quite clear about not compromising or making deals. They are only interested in obstruction of anything democrats do.

> The Republicans were pumped because they saw a path out of the political wilderness. They were convinced that even if Obama kept winning policy battles, they could win the broader messaging war simply by remaining unified and fighting him on everything. Their conference chairman, a then-obscure Indiana conservative named Mike Pence, underscored the point with a clip from _Patton_ , showing the general rallying his troops for war against their Nazi enemy: “We’re going to kick the hell out of him all the time! We’re going to go through him like crap through a goose!”
> 
> SOURCE: [The Victory of ‘No’: The GOP’s unprecedented anti-Obama obstructionism was a remarkable success. And then it handed the party to Donald Trump.](https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/12/republican-party-obstructionism-victory-trump-214498/)

Despite Trump being a toddler and not understanding Washington remember that he got the second highest vote count in history in 2020 and remains the leader of his party.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2022, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/102 "2022-11-10T15:41:38Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> Republicans don’t do that anymore. Indeed, they are quite clear about not compromising or making deals. They are only interested in obstruction of anything democrats do.

I’m not saying they work with Democrats. But Republican politicians fully understand the benefit of working with other Republican politicians along with various conservative pundits and wealthy businessmen. The standard deal is _“You give me a million dollars for my campaign and I’ll give you a five million dollar tax cut. We both benefit.”_ That’s Republican politics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2022, 3:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/103 "2022-11-10T15:47:34Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> Despite Trump being a toddler and not understanding Washington remember that he got the second highest vote count in history in 2020 and remains the leader of his party.

And the other guy in that election got the highest vote count in history. Which makes Trump a loser.

Nobody cares who came in second place. (Except when the Republicans say the guy who came in second place gets to be President anyway.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Telemark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/telemark/32/372_2.png) [@Telemark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Telemark)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2022, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/104 "2022-11-10T15:57:01Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> They are only interested in obstruction of anything democrats do.

Making Trump the Speaker of the House does nothing to further that goal. They can obstruct just fine by electing a sitting GOP representative to that position.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tripthicket](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripthicket/32/297_2.png) [@tripthicket](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tripthicket)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2022, 8:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/105 "2022-11-10T20:17:52Z")

</div>

A sticking point that I don’t think I’ve seen mentioned yet: Not being an elected Representative, Trump wouldn’t get a vote on anything, despite (hypothetically) being named Speaker of the House. Do I have that right? And wouldn’t he insist on such a thing, laws and norms be damned?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slicedalone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slicedalone/32/12515_2.png) [@slicedalone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/slicedalone)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2022, 8:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/106 "2022-11-10T20:50:02Z")

</div>

Hardly. I would think he doesn’t want a voting record, just to order others, threaten some, praise others, and be the center of attention, as far it doesn’t interfere with his golfing and tanning-bed schedule.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Buck\_Godot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/buck_godot/32/6573_2.png) [@Buck\_Godot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Buck_Godot)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2022, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/107 "2022-11-10T22:19:47Z")

</div>

I concur. What good is being one equal vote among 435? Now if it was like ice cream where the speaker got two votes and everyone else just got one, then maybe he’d be interested.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Euphonious\_Polemic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/euphonious_polemic/32/3002_2.png) [@Euphonious\_Polemic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Euphonious_Polemic)\
**Post date:** [November 11, 2022, 1:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/108 "2022-11-11T01:56:20Z")

</div>

> [@Marvin\_the\_Martian](#):
>
> Lord Dampnut.

Thank you. I had not heard this Trump nickname until now, and it made me smile.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 1:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/109 "2022-11-15T13:51:28Z")

</div>

Been reading the news, hearing about McCarthy struggling to herd the wackos in the GOP into unified action, and seeing speculation that this creates an opening not just for Trump but also someone like Liz Cheney, who could be supported by Dems and a small coalition of rebel Republicans. All wildly unlikely, of course, just to be clear.

But — in the bizarre reality where someone gets named as Speaker who is not a sitting member of the House …

Who is that person’s employer? Do they even have one? Do they draw a paycheck? Or is just a ceremonial volunteer role that happens to have a lot of actual authority attached?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flurb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/51bf81/32.png) [@flurb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flurb)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/110 "2022-11-15T14:00:34Z")

</div>

The Speaker of the House receives a salary of $223,500 per year, as well as a budget for staff, travel, etc. Their “employer” would be the House itself; their salary and budget being funded through the annual Legislative Appropriations Act.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steve\_MB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steve_mb/32/5339_2.png) [@Steve\_MB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steve_MB)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 2:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/111 "2022-11-15T14:11:06Z")

</div>

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> that same average Republican congressman is thinking _“But while this plan is a bad idea for Trump, it’s still an interesting plan. If an actual congressman - like myself - was elected to the speakership, that congressman would not face the same backlash that Trump would. A congressman being elected to the speakership is a normal thing and an average congressman - like myself - doesn’t have the history of having done a terrible job as President. And an actual congressman - like myself - has the knowledge of working the legislative system that Trump doesn’t have. That Speaker could start working on the impeachments in order to advance to the presidency._

Then the magic mushrooms or whatever will wear off and he’ll remember the missing “win a 2/3 vote in the Senate” step.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 2:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/112 "2022-11-15T14:11:20Z")

</div>

Right, I saw that, but what I can’t tell is, is that specifically the salary for the Speaker, _on top of_ whatever their Representative salary is, or is that the _replacement_ salary for the Representative who is serving as Speaker?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 2:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/113 "2022-11-15T14:54:03Z")

</div>

Just checked and the applicable law (2 USC 4501) creates three categories:  
A: Members of both Houses, voting and nonvoting  
B: President ProTem of Senate, majority and minority leaders of each House  
C: Speaker

So the salary is specifically for being Speaker. People may observe that the statutory title was and remains headed as: “Compensation and Retirement Pay of Members of Congress” ; however it is established law that only the actual Senators and Representatives elected by a state get the vote, but the nonvoting delegates still ARE “members”.

So my utter speculation is a non-Representative Speaker would become a nonvoting Member.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 2:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/114 "2022-11-15T14:59:00Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> if Republicans gain control of the House in the next election they can name anyone to be Speaker and could choose Trump…no need for him to be a member of Congress).

I believe that the shocking (Republican view) results of the mid-terms elections have influenced Republican thinking. I believe that, if it somehow hasn’t already happened, their view of Trump as still being the best choice has been significantly altered. In fact, from what I read this morning, a number of influential Republicans are balking at the thought of Trump even running again.

This guy is severely damaged goods, and he hasn’t even gone to trial yet. It’s only going to get worse. I think the Republican party would be doing itself a service if it began to distance itself from its most extreme elements.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Euphonious\_Polemic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/euphonious_polemic/32/3002_2.png) [@Euphonious\_Polemic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Euphonious_Polemic)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/115 "2022-11-15T15:54:29Z")

</div>

> [@Jasmine](#):
>
> This guy is severely damaged goods, and he hasn’t even gone to trial yet. It’s only going to get worse. I think the Republican party would be doing itself a service if it began to distance itself from its most extreme elements.

True, but they can’t give up the extremists, because they represent a very large and loyal voting bloc. Give up the extremists, and you give up the election.

Long term, they need to do this. Short term, they can’t.

Their best hope is that the DOJ indicts Trump and prevents him from running. Then they can blame the Democrats, retain the crazies and hope to win in 2024.

Blaming others is a Republican strong suit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/116 "2022-11-15T15:55:33Z")

</div>

> [@Euphonious\_Polemic](#):
>
> Their best hope is that the DOJ indicts Trump and prevents him from running. Then they can blame the Democrats, retain the crazies and hope to win in 2024.

Bingo! You win the prize.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kolak_of_twilo/32/73_2.png) [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolak_of_Twilo)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/117 "2022-11-15T17:06:05Z")

</div>

I’m not very clear to me how the DOJ indicting Trump would prevent him from running. But that discussion might be more appropriate in a different thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thing.Fish](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thing.fish/32/9168_2.png) [@Thing.Fish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thing.Fish)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/118 "2022-11-15T17:12:00Z")

</div>

I think the assumption is that, if Trump is either on trial or actually convicted and imprisoned by the time of the next election, he wouldn’t run for President and wouldn’t be nominated if he did. I’m not sure that assumption holds in the context of the modern Republican Party.

Certainly you CAN run for President while doing time; Eugene Debs got over a million votes that way in 1920, and didn’t have to worry about campaign travel expenses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kolak_of_twilo/32/73_2.png) [@Kolak\_of\_Twilo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolak_of_Twilo)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 5:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/119 "2022-11-15T17:17:16Z")

</div>

I think your assumption is faulty. The only way I see Trump not running is if he is dead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [November 15, 2022, 5:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020/120 "2022-11-15T17:17:35Z")

</div>

> [@Martin\_Hyde](#):
>
> A House rule would work, I’m unsure on a law.

There is a potential issue with that. Actually 2  
Suppose no member wants to be Speaker, could you force somebody to be Speaker?  
And going along with that, it is basic Parliamentary Law that a member cannot lose their rights as member without a trial or other due process. Of course if you volunteer to be Chair, Speaker, President, etc. that is a different issue but I think forcing a member to be Speaker (thus losing their right since they are now the presiding officer) would be disallowed under a Point of Order. Otherwise why not force Joe Manchin to be President Pro Tempore of the Senate and anytime he threatens to go against the party, Vice-President Harris is conveniently absent and he is forced to preside (and not make motions, debate or vote).

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trump-as-speaker-of-the-house-need-not-even-win-an-election/947020.md?page=7)
