# Trust Level 3

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trust-level-3/916768>\
**Category:** Site Feedback\
**Created:** [July 29, 2020, 11:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trust-level-3/916768 "2020-07-29T23:26:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 51

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2020, 6:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trust-level-3/916768/51 "2020-08-03T06:17:53Z")

</div>

I made a suggestion about trust level 3 in this thread:

> [@I don't think threads should be censored](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-think-threads-should-be-censored/917081/30):
>
> I am not aware of any definition for “Charlie Foxtrot”. You could be talking about corn flakes for all I know. So it’s hypocritical of you to complain about a bot censoring threads when you’re too sensitive to use the word “fuck.” Come on, we’re all adults here.

If we’re going to have posters with lesser powers, how about the power to unhide posts? And, assuming the number stays low, how about the ability to unlock threads–if they were autolocked only?

Both are features we don’t want. And while a bot doing it would be better, maybe using our existing resources would be a good idea.

And if this is automated, then I guess I don’t use the SDMB as much as I thought.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/trust-level-3/916768)._