Japan is a good example.
Japan has an ecological footprint of 5,403,896 km2, compared with an available 1,131,048 km2 of biologically productive space. Cite
Thus Japan needs five times as much area of the size of the country to sustain the countries level of consumption. Much of the land needed to sustain Japan would be in China and USA, since they are their main trading partners.
I appreciate that consumption is not directly proportional to standard of living, although there is an obvious correlation.
According to the study cited here, India, China and Pakistan are countries that (in 1997) consume at a level that can be supported by their productive land.
Don’t forget that land needs to be set aside to maintain biodiversity. Not all potentially productive land can be used as farmland. Biodiversity is not only essential for our survival, but is is also a contributor to standard of living.
xtism “stuff that replaces hydrocarbon based fuels”. I agree that alternative fuel sources will take over from fossil fuels. Even vehicles running on biofuels, require productive land to grow the biofuels.
So it looks like western countries must reduce their consumption levels if we are to give people from deveoloping nations a fair go.