Well, there you go, it’s not just the Americans. I guess it’s NBA hubris, not American national hubris.
But i don’t think this changes my point. The only reason that the Olympics might be considered “unimportant exhibition play” is that these NBA players don’t turn up. If they decide not to go because they don’t think the event is important enough, they create the very conditions that they are complaining about.
That’s not a “flip side” at all. It’s a completely different issue. Maybe those players aren’t good enough to make the NBA, or maybe they are good enough to make it, but not good enough to be a real star in it. Much as i rejoiced in the US team’s loss the other day, i’m not naive enough to believe that any other country could beat the US if the Americans did field the best possible team. There’s absolutely no doubt that the quality of play in the US is head and shoulders above the rest of the world. But the only way to increase the quality the world over is to give the lesser countries an opportunity to play against the best.
That principle has been recognized by plenty of other sports, inside and outside the Olympics. No-one gives the United States or Japan any realistic chance of winning the Rugby World Cup, but i’m willing to bet that the US and Japanese players wouldn’t see their participation as pointless. Similarly, The Netherlands were never going to provide any real challenge in last year’s Cricket World Cup, but i’m sure they relished the chance to play against the best in the world.
You say that the winners of Olympic Gold in basketball cannot say they’re the best team in the world, but when the US refuses to send its best team this is a self-fulfilling prophecy. If America sent its best team, and they won, then the winner of gold would be the world’s best team. And if they got beaten, we might could reasonably say that whoever beat them is the best team. Simple, really.
Look, i’m not even much of a basketball fan, and it wouldn’t worry me too much if it got dropped from the Olympics. But one reason i do like it is that, as other people in this thread have pointed out, the referees sometimes actually seem willing to call things like travelling. When i first moved to the US and watched a few NBA games, i was aghast that basic rules that i had played under as a kid were so openly and obviously flaunted. With all the travelling in the NBA, sometimes i wonder why they bother bouncing the ball at all. Maybe if they have to play in a competition where the rules of the game are actually enforced, it will encourage similar standards among NBA players. But i’m not holding my breath.