Interesting article, but I do have a couple of problems with Van Ripers tactics.
**Van Riper had at his disposal a computer-generated flotilla of small boats and planes, many of them civilian, which he kept buzzing around the virtual Persian Gulf in circles as the game was about to get under way. As the US fleet entered the Gulf, Van Riper gave a signal - not in a radio transmission that might have been intercepted, but in a coded message broadcast from the minarets of mosques at the call to prayer. The seemingly harmless pleasure craft and propeller planes suddenly turned deadly, ramming into Blue boats and airfields along the Gulf in scores of al-Qaida-style suicide attacks.
Not for one moment do I beleive that any civilian planes or boats would be allowed to get close enough to any battle group on alert to do any damage. Remember the Iranian jet liner tradgedy? And as far as sending coded messages from mosques, how in the world can anyone in a boat or plane hear that? I’d like to have a set of those speakers.
** Meanwhile, Chinese Silkworm-type cruise missiles fired from some of the small boats sank the US fleet’s only aircraft carrier and two marine helicopter carriers.
Again I don’t think that any warships or civilian boats will be allowed to come within striking distance. And while I’m no expert on Silkworm-type cruise missiles I don’t think they can be mounted on or launched from “small boats”. During the Gulf War these missiles were ground based. Some were fired, none sunk or hit a warship.
If or when a carrier battle group enters the Persian gulf “ready for action” a piece of drift wood will be destroyed if it floats to close.
Van Riper sounds like one hell of a Marine and like a good Marine he took what he had and kicked the enemys ass. When it comes down to a shooting war its men like him that give me faith that we will win.
As for the rest of the article, the top brass should have let Van Riper proceed. Reset the damn game and learn from what seems to be one of the best.