# UK Local elections and the rise of UKIP

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [May 4, 2013, 4:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470 "2013-05-04T04:22:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2013, 4:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/1 "2013-05-04T04:22:21Z")

</div>

[Results here.](http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21240025)

For those who don’t know, UKIP is a far right, anti-immigration and anti-Europe party in Britain. It made large gains in the local county elections we have just had. The results do not reflect the country as a whole very well, since the elections were not in all regions, and the regions that did have elections are mostly rural and conservative leaning. Nevertheless…

Is the continuing rise of UKIP now inevitable?

Does it make Scottish independence significantly more likely?

Will it cause the Tories to move to the right? If so, (and if it becomes apparent before the next general election campaign) how will the Lib Dems in the coalition respond? Might they grow some backbone and split?

Is the fate of the Lib Dems now sealed?

Will the conservative vote be split by UKIP, leading to a Labour win at the next general election?

(The pundit consensus seems to be that Labour is most likely to win the next general election anyway, but I am not sure I see it, given that Ed Miliband seems such an uncharismatic leader.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2013, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/2 "2013-05-04T23:04:38Z")

</div>

UKIP is anti-EU and anti-immigrant. I’m not sure what you mean by “far right”, beyond that. They don’t seem to have any other policies worthy of the name.

I don’t think that these results are particularly significant. It’s just a midterm election. Governments always do badly in them. Regarding the EU, the Conservatives will probably find a satisfactory way of making a referendum seem more imminent, while not actually committing to it. What we are seeing right now is just the pro-referendum camp trying to haggle the date forward a bit. But I would guess that it would still be after the next election, if it ever happens.

I don’t think it has any bearing on the Scottish referendum.

The Lib Dems will do badly at the next general election, and then recover to about where they were before.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2013, 11:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/3 "2013-05-04T23:15:40Z")

</div>

> [@Ximenean](#):
>
> They don’t seem to have any other policies worthy of the name.

To clarify, I mean that they don’t seem to have any other policies worthy of the name “policy”. I do not mean that they don’t have any other right-wing policies.

(I could not have meant that, since I don’t believe that “right-wing” actually means anything.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tapioca_Dextrin)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2013, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/4 "2013-05-04T23:34:22Z")

</div>

It’s similar to the Greens doing well when Labour is in power. The Daily Mail will undoubtedly pee in its knickers, but nothing substantial will happen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tapioca_Dextrin)\
**Post date:** [May 4, 2013, 11:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/5 "2013-05-04T23:38:09Z")

</div>

And as for the Far Right doing well… [BNP tells members to have more babies to avoid repeat of local election failures](http://metro.co.uk/2013/05/04/british-national-party-asks-members-to-procreate-to-help-election-chances-3712992/) 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 1:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/6 "2013-05-05T01:34:43Z")

</div>

> [@Ximenean](#):
>
> The Lib Dems will do badly at the next general election, and then recover to about where they were before.

Are the LibDems pro- or anti-EU?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 2:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/7 "2013-05-05T02:31:31Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Are the LibDems pro- or anti-EU?

Definitely pro. They’re the most pro-EU party I’d say since the Tories have many Eurosceptic traditionalist types while Labour has some fringe, leftist folks who dislike the EU.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 3:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/8 "2013-05-05T03:31:10Z")

</div>

> [@Ximenean](#):
>
> UKIP is anti-EU and anti-immigrant. I’m not sure what you mean by “far right”, beyond that. They don’t seem to have any other policies worthy of the name.

I believe they have talked about drastically curtailing employee rights and the welfare state. That certainly falls within what I mean by “far right”.

> [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](#):
>
> And as for the Far Right doing well… [BNP tells members to have more babies to avoid repeat of local election failures](http://metro.co.uk/2013/05/04/british-national-party-asks-members-to-procreate-to-help-election-chances-3712992/) 😃

Well that is the thing. BNP support (such as it ever was) has collapsed because most of their supporters have switched to UKIP, but UKIP has a much softer (less overtly Naziish) image that is clearly capable of attracting lots of other voters too. I realize that what has happened at these local elections is just a protest vote, but it is significant both as to what direction the protest vote is going in, and the fact that UKIP now has quite a lot of councilors and will have grounds for being treated as a “serious” party. There are also rumors that Rupert Murdoch is considering putting the support of The Sun (and perhaps to some extent even The Times) behind UKIP. That could surely be a real game changer. Never underestimate the political power of tits!

I am not convinced the Lib Dems can bounce back, either. Before this coalition, their supporters could freely fantasize about how nice they would be in power, and what a great moderating effect they would have on any coalition they might get to be part of. (And about how, once they got a little bit of power, they would get PR passed and then hold the balance of power for ever.) That dream has now been shattered by political realities, and I doubt they can ever get the feeling back. Coalition, their holy grail for decades, has turned out to be no fun at all for them. (Of course, their vote won’t go to UKIP. It will presumably be divided between Labour, the Tories, and the Greens. It could mean, however, that UKIP becomes the “third party”, and will thereby be taken a lot more seriously by the media, quite apart from anything Murdoch might do.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![blindboyard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blindboyard/32/2833_2.png) [@blindboyard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/blindboyard)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 12:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/9 "2013-05-05T12:25:00Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> [Results here.](http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21240025)
> 
> For those who don’t know, UKIP is a far right, anti-immigration and anti-Europe party in Britain. It made large gains in the local county elections we have just had. The results do not reflect the country as a whole very well, since the elections were not in all regions, and the regions that did have elections are mostly rural and conservative leaning. Nevertheless…
> 
> Is the continuing rise of UKIP now inevitable?

No. Although, as an anti-Tory, it’s gratifying to see the Tory vote spilt for once.

> [@](#):
>
> Does it make Scottish independence significantly more likely?

I don’t think so.

> [@](#):
>
> Will it cause the Tories to move to the right? If so, (and if it becomes apparent before the next general election campaign) how will the Lib Dems in the coalition respond? Might they grow some backbone and split?

I don’t think the UKIP are really any more right-wing than the Tories, they have after all gone and hired a think tank to dream up some policies for them, it’s just that they have one difference from the Tories, their populist hatred of the EU.

As for the LibDems, their approach will be to grasp their ankles ever more tightly until we put them out of their misery.

> [@](#):
>
> Is the fate of the Lib Dems now sealed?

Fingers crossed.

> [@](#):
>
> Will the conservative vote be split by UKIP, leading to a Labour win at the next general election?

Toes also crossed. Double-crossed, in fact, just like all those fools who voted for the LibDems last time around.

> [@](#):
>
> (The pundit consensus seems to be that Labour is most likely to win the next general election anyway, but I am not sure I see it, given that Ed Miliband seems such an uncharismatic leader.)

Wonk-boy would be a pleasing change of pace after the sickening doughy one and his little yellow wife.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 4:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/10 "2013-05-05T16:10:54Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> For those who don’t know, UKIP is a far right…

Point of correction. UKIP is not a far right party. It’s pretty much the anti-EU wing of the Conservatives.

Actually, one of Farage’s big problems has been and is going to continue to be infiltration by the likes of the BNP

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/11 "2013-05-05T20:15:45Z")

</div>

> [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](#):
>
> And as for the Far Right doing well… [BNP tells members to have more babies to avoid repeat of local election failures](http://metro.co.uk/2013/05/04/british-national-party-asks-members-to-procreate-to-help-election-chances-3712992/) 😃

You said a [Quiverfull](http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Quiverfull)!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/12 "2013-05-05T20:18:26Z")

</div>

What are the chances of a resurgence of what might be called Old Labour (i.e., with pre-Blair politics)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/13 "2013-05-05T21:32:13Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> What are the chances of a resurgence of what might be called Old Labour (i.e., with pre-Blair politics)?

Unlikely, since a lot of the arguments on which pre-Blair Labour campaigned have been emphatically lost or are no longer relevant. The idea that major industries should be owned by the state seems pretty crazy now (well, except certain banks ;)), but it was a serious question back then. The matter of how, or indeed whether, to defend ourselves against potential attack from the Soviet Union kind of faded a bit when the Soviet Union ceased to exist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/14 "2013-05-05T21:39:04Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> What are the chances of a resurgence of what might be called Old Labour (i.e., with pre-Blair politics)?

Low, I think. The groups that oppose the neo-liberal consensus from the left are small, riven by factionalism, and they all hate each other anyway. Business as usual really.

Have a look at the politics boards on Urban75 for a taste of this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/15 "2013-05-05T21:40:37Z")

</div>

> [@Ximenean](#):
>
> The idea that major industries should be owned by the state seems pretty crazy now (well, except certain banks ;)), but it was a serious question back then.

The railways, maybe?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 10:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/16 "2013-05-05T22:32:35Z")

</div>

Okay, but except the banks, the railways, and the car companies, when have industries been owned by the state recently?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/17 "2013-05-05T22:55:56Z")

</div>

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> Okay, but except the banks, the railways, and the car companies, when have industries been owned by the state recently?

Up until the 80s, in the UK, the state had a stake in the following (but not always exclusively so, there were competitors for some)

the provision of natural gas (with different entities on a regional basis),

the provision of telephony services,

the extraction of coal,

the provision of electrical power generation and distribution (on a regional basis),

the provision of water and sewerage services (complicated, but also regional),

British Aerospace,

British Airways,

British Steel,

British Nuclear Fuels Limited,

British Shipbuilders (mostly for military stuff)

There was loads more, but these are the main ones that got sold off.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2013, 11:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/18 "2013-05-05T23:02:54Z")

</div>

There are still substantial UK government owned entities though, like RBS and Lloyds Bank (recent acquisitions!) and the Post Office. Scottish Water remained in public hands when the other water boards were sold off, and is now an asset of the Scottish Government.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2013, 1:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/19 "2013-05-06T01:09:50Z")

</div>

About the UKIP I cannot speak, being on the opposite side of the Pond. But on a side question raised in the OP, let me observe this:

Consider a political party. It or its pre-merger predecessor:  
[ul][li]Has been continuously represented in Commons by at least five members since the mid-1800s[/li][li]During a 60-year period won about half of general elections with a mjaority or plurality enabling it to form a Government[/li][li]Regularly draws between 10% and 20% of the vote nationally, and has since it stopped being in competition for forming Governments[/li][li]In the last election it took almost 10% of Commons seats – the most it has held since 1929.[/ul][/li]These are clearly the marks of a moribund party not long for this world. :dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [May 6, 2013, 3:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470/20 "2013-05-06T03:22:41Z")

</div>

> [@Ximenean](#):
>
> I don’t think that these results are particularly significant. It’s just a midterm election.

So the Queen is up for election in two years?

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-local-elections-and-the-rise-of-ukip/657470.md?page=2)
