# UK Snap Election: 8 June 2017

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [April 18, 2017, 10:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690 "2017-04-18T10:08:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Northern\_Piper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/northern_piper/32/5304_2.png) [@Northern\_Piper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Northern_Piper)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 2:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/41 "2017-04-19T02:24:58Z")

</div>

No politician wants to give up power while they’re still in the running. “Playing the long game” means staying in as long as possible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UDS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/ecae2f/32.png) [@UDS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UDS)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 5:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/42 "2017-04-19T05:09:34Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> Am I the only one who thinks she is playing the long game, hoping to lose so that the Tories are out of power during the disaster that is Brexit, blame their opponents for the mess they caused, and then use that to take and hold power afterwards?

Yes, you are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PastTense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pasttense/32/14550_2.png) [@PastTense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PastTense)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 5:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/43 "2017-04-19T05:26:54Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> Am I the only one who thinks she is playing the long game, hoping to lose so that the Tories are out of power during the disaster that is Brexit, blame their opponents for the mess they caused, and then use that to take and hold power afterwards?

The Tories are substantially ahead in the polls. What you are saying would only make sense if the Tories were behind in the polls.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lisiate](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/f05b48/32.png) [@lisiate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lisiate)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 5:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/44 "2017-04-19T05:36:50Z")

</div>

> [@Northern\_Piper](#):
>
> Nice. Suggesting a democratically elected Prime Minister is Hitler. :dubious:

May didn’t win an election to become prime minister. I hope the fire suppression systems in the House of Commons are in good working order. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Northern\_Piper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/northern_piper/32/5304_2.png) [@Northern\_Piper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Northern_Piper)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/45 "2017-04-19T06:00:07Z")

</div>

She won her seat in the Commons by a regular election, and won the leadership by the rules of the Conservative Party.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 6:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/46 "2017-04-19T06:26:13Z")

</div>

> [@Northern\_Piper](#):
>
> She won her seat in the Commons by a regular election, and won the leadership by the rules of the Conservative Party.

I’ve suspected it for a while but now I know it. I’m outing you as Kim Campbell.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mijin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mijin/32/9369_2.png) [@Mijin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mijin)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 6:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/47 "2017-04-19T06:27:29Z")

</div>

> [@lilihob](#):
>
> May has just told Labour to put up or shut up.  
> If a general election doesn’t happen, they look like cowards.  
> It may back fire spectacularly, but I respect her for it. She wants her mandate.  
> It looks like a u turn, but it will stop all the constant sniping.  
> Tim Fallon is excited, he’s getting his chance, so the Lib Dems will agree.  
> So Labour, are you up for it?

It looks like too big a risk to me for the potential gain.

I mean “stop all the constant sniping” is pretty much what prompted Cameron to hold the brexit referendum, a vote everyone was sure he couldn’t lose (at the time of proposing it).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Princhester](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3e96dc/32.png) [@Princhester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Princhester)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 6:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/48 "2017-04-19T06:43:32Z")

</div>

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> May was by no means the most outspoken Tory in her opposition to Brexit; she actually took some flak for it at the time. And now, I don’t know that she _supports_ Brexit, as such, so much as she believes it’s her job to carry out the wishes of the majority of the British people who voted for it.

Nah, she’s way too enthusiastic about Brexit for it to be merely a matter of following through. She likes it because it’s a strong wedge issue for the left.

The Conservative base aren’t going to change their vote even if they don’t like Brexit.

But heaps of non-conservative voters are also working and lower middle class who are pro-Brexit due to xenophobia, and feel strongly enough about it for it to influence their vote.

May herself and many conservatives would probably be completely happy with some form of soft Brexit approach, but she’s hell bent on the toughest hardline Brexit she can dream up. Why? Because when you are wedging you want to take the most extreme position possible, so that your opponents can’t follow you, and consequently get wedged.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 6:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/49 "2017-04-19T06:55:52Z")

</div>

> [@Baron\_Greenback](#):
>
> Tomorrow’s Daily Mail front page is quite something:
> 
> [x.com](https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/854449280865767425)
> 
> That sort of rhetoric is really not good.

She looks like a pissed off Headmistress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 6:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/50 "2017-04-19T06:58:11Z")

</div>

> [@Princhester](#):
>
> Nah, she’s way too enthusiastic about Brexit for it to be merely a matter of following through. She likes it because it’s a strong wedge issue for the left.
> 
> The Conservative base aren’t going to change their vote even if they don’t like Brexit.
> 
> But heaps of non-conservative voters are also working and lower middle class who are pro-Brexit due to xenophobia, and feel strongly enough about it for it to influence their vote.
> 
> May herself and many conservatives would probably be completely happy with some form of soft Brexit approach, but she’s hell bent on the toughest hardline Brexit she can dream up. Why? Because when you are wedging you want to take the most extreme position possible, so that your opponents can’t follow you, and consequently get wedged.

Well if Marie La Pen wins in France, hard/soft dichotomy becomes moot, the EU is going to be a drowning man.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 7:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/51 "2017-04-19T07:23:52Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> She looks like a pissed off Headmistress.

That may be what she’s aiming for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 7:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/52 "2017-04-19T07:24:14Z")

</div>

> [@lisiate](#):
>
> If May doesn’t get the result she wants [this time](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_federal_election,_July_1932)will she call another vote [in November](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_federal_election,_November_1932)? Or [next March](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_federal_election,_March_1933)?

Ah, come on. That simply isn’t helpful to anyone’s case. The Tory’s are to the left of Obama and Clinton and any (even joking) comparisons to Hitler just bolster the case for left-leaning hysteria and demonisation that we’ve already covered on these boards post-Trump.

Is there a degree of self-serving political reasoning behind this?..yes, to the exactly the same degree as at every other election in UK history. Nothing new or special there.

No democratic rules have been broken, The other parties are free to stop this election if they choose, the oppositions have said consistently that May does not have a mandate for the sort of Brexit she’s put forward…well she’s now put it out there and is standing on that platform. If there truly is a swell of opinion in the country that they don’t want this direction then now there is a perfect opportunity to stop it.

A free vote at an opportune time on the most massive issues of the day seems like the very definition of democratic. I’m not a Tory but I can’t see any downside in having this vote now other than the fact that Labour is in disarray but that is their own problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 7:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/53 "2017-04-19T07:32:43Z")

</div>

The Tories have been in power 7 years. I cannot think of any recent party in power which gained seats (despite winning an election) which increased its majority on an election held 7 years after being in power. Thatcher lost around 21 seats in 1987 and Blair near 50 in 2005. I think McMillan gained some seats in 1959.

Incumbent fatigue should never be discounted and I think May might well lose her majority outright.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![up\_the\_junction](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f1d935/32.png) [@up\_the\_junction](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/up_the_junction)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 7:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/54 "2017-04-19T07:40:13Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> She looks like a pissed off Headmistress.

I can’t get the image out of my head of the leader singer of The Cure, Robert Smith.

> **[Singer Robert Smith of British rock band The Cure performs on stage...](https://www.gettyimages.co.nz/detail/news-photo/singer-robert-smith-of-british-rock-band-the-cure-performs-news-photo/623406882)**
>
> Singer Robert Smith of British rock band The Cure performs on stage during a concert at the Bercy Arena in Paris on November 15, 2016.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Princhester](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3e96dc/32.png) [@Princhester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Princhester)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 7:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/55 "2017-04-19T07:55:49Z")

</div>

> [@Alessan](#):
>
> That may be what she’s aiming for.

Probably is, she’s following the Thatcher lead. The stern headmistress is an acceptable female power role and persona for female English politicians to adopt.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grumman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Grumman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grumman)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 9:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/56 "2017-04-19T09:19:14Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> Incumbent fatigue should never be discounted and I think May might well lose her majority outright.

It’s not enough for incumbent fatigue to be a thing; it has to be more of a thing than the millstone currently sitting around Labour’s neck.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stanislaus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stanislaus/32/3391_2.png) [@Stanislaus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stanislaus)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 9:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/57 "2017-04-19T09:41:46Z")

</div>

> [@Baron\_Greenback](#):
>
> Tomorrow’s Daily Mail front page is quite something:
> 
> [x.com](https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/854449280865767425)
> 
> That sort of rhetoric is really not good.

It is, however, a pretty fair summary of May’s statement announcing the election:

> [@](#):
>
> "At this moment of enormous national significance there should be unity here in Westminster, but instead there is division. The country is coming together, but Westminster is not.
> 
> In recent weeks Labour has threatened to vote against the deal we reach with the European Union. The Liberal Democrats have said they want to grind the business of government to a standstill. The Scottish National Party say they will vote against the legislation that formally repeals Britain’s membership of the European Union. And unelected members of the House of Lords have vowed to fight us every step of the way.
> 
> …
> 
> Because what they are doing jeopardises the work we must do to prepare for Brexit at home and it weakens the Government’s negotiating position in Europe. If we do not hold a general election now their political game-playing will continue, and the negotiations with the European Union will reach their most difficult stage in the run-up to the next scheduled election. Division in Westminster will risk our ability to make a success of Brexit and it will cause damaging uncertainty and instability to the country.

In summary, she’s saying that when the opposition have the effrontery to oppose her [spoiler: this isn’t actually happening] they’re damaging the country, so she’s calling an election to get rid of them, or in other words, “Crush the saboteurs”. It’s not the Mail’s rhetoric, it’s May’s.

NB, with respect to her first para: Following a 52/48 vote there should \*\*not \*\*be unity in Westminster, and the country is \*\*not \*\*coming together - attitudes to Brexit among both Remainers and Leavers are pretty much what they were in June. But it obviously helps her enormously to plant the idea that any opposition to her particular interpretation of Brexit is flying in the face of the settled will of the whole British people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stanislaus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stanislaus/32/3391_2.png) [@Stanislaus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stanislaus)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 9:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/58 "2017-04-19T09:47:53Z")

</div>

> [@Grumman](#):
>
> It’s not enough for incumbent fatigue to be a thing; it has to be more of a thing than the millstone currently sitting around Labour’s neck.

Yeah, it’s pretty clear, both from polls and from the bye-election win in Copeland (where the incumbent government won the seat from the opposition) that people just aren’t that fed up with the Tories. One reason for this is that Labour are not challenging them. The other is that as a government they’ve undergone quite the change, both in terms of personnel (Cam/Osbo/Hague/Gove out and May/Hammond/Johnson/Davis in) and in terms of policies (Remain/Leave being the obvious one, but also grammar schools and the timetable for clearing the deficit).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 10:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/59 "2017-04-19T10:14:56Z")

</div>

> [@AK84](#):
>
> The Tories have been in power 7 years. I cannot think of any recent party in power which gained seats (despite winning an election) which increased its majority on an election held 7 years after being in power. Thatcher lost around 21 seats in 1987 and Blair near 50 in 2005. I think McMillan gained some seats in 1959.
> 
> Incumbent fatigue should never be discounted and I think May might well lose her majority outright.

That isn’t what I hear from the fairly disparate group of voters I work and socialise with.

Theresa May is, when compared to Corbyn, a strong leader with clear ideas, clearly expressed. Even those who aren’t Tory voters say that. Incumbent fatigue comes into it when a party has been ploughing the same furrow for years but the clock has somewhat been reset by brexit and the switch to May. It is enough of a change for this to feel like a new administration.

Labour have a problem that the Lib-dems don’t have. They are pro-brexit but must stand on a platform of frustrating of either a) getting in power and continuing to leave the EU but watering down the brexit plan (which isn’t popular to many people) or b) being in opposition and trying to frustrate the government at every turn. A turn of events that will make it easy for the EU to offer a poorer deal.  
It is a hard one for them to spin and even harder for Corbyn to make attractive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stanislaus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stanislaus/32/3391_2.png) [@Stanislaus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stanislaus)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2017, 11:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690/60 "2017-04-19T11:37:01Z")

</div>

> [@Novelty\_Bobble](#):
>
> That isn’t what I hear from the fairly disparate group of voters I work and socialise with.
> 
> Theresa May is, when compared to Corbyn, a strong leader with clear ideas, clearly expressed. Even those who aren’t Tory voters say that. Incumbent fatigue comes into it when a party has been ploughing the same furrow for years but the clock has somewhat been reset by brexit and the switch to May. It is enough of a change for this to feel like a new administration.

Yeah, May’s position vs Corbyn is incredibly strong right now. He’s coming third to Don’t Know in terms of who would make a better leader.

> [@](#):
>
> Labour have a problem that the Lib-dems don’t have. They are pro-brexit but must stand on a platform of frustrating of either a) getting in power and continuing to leave the EU but watering down the brexit plan (which isn’t popular to many people) or b) being in opposition and trying to frustrate the government at every turn. A turn of events that will make it easy for the EU to offer a poorer deal.  
> It is a hard one for them to spin and even harder for Corbyn to make attractive.

I don’t agree that watering down the Brexit plan would be unpopular, if it were presented right (a big if). May has been watering down her own Brexit plan quite a bit recently (e.g. we’re now going to have both continued freedom of movement and a role for the ECJ post 2020, and we’re looking at all kinds of special visas to keep a permanent flow of high immigration, and no-one seems to mind particularly). And far from frustrating the government at every turn, Labour have made the process ludicrously easy. Three-line whips to vote for the central government bill are not particularly frustrating to the government.

If Labour had an actual position on Brexit which it could articulate clearly and present as “ensuring we get the best deal for British workers” they could do alright. It’s problem is that it literally doesn’t know what it thinks.

I also don’t agree - which puts me in a minority, I think - that having a bolshy opposition makes it easier for the EU to offer a poor deal. Having a parliament to push a deal through lets May say “Sorry, you’ll have to do better because that won’t wash at home.” The US, for example, are past masters at this approach. Conversely, when the Tories have a c.80 seat majority with a Brexit mandate, the EU will know that any deal they offer will be taken up enthusiastically, so where’s the incentive to offer easier terms?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/uk-snap-election-8-june-2017/784690.md?page=4)
