# Um, Stalinists Run US Peace Movement?  Would that be bad?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 11, 2003, 7:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317 "2003-02-11T07:35:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lout](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a6a055/32.png) [@lout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lout)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2003, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/21 "2003-02-11T20:55:19Z")

</div>

This thread consists of a completely lame attempt at “guilt by association” a la Joe McCarthy.

> [@](#):
>
> Many of the US anti-war movement’s visible demonstrations are generated by people with a preference for some of the worst governments I can imagine. Talk about unclean hands.

The point of a demonstration is to convey a public message. That message is completely unaffected – logically, practically and morally – by the supposed associations of people involved in the demonstration.

The pretense that anyone would suddenly decide not to participate in a peace demonstration after learning that some “stalinist” group was involved in organizing it, is just peurile.

If the author of this thread has a disagreement with the peace movement on its merits, he/she should state it honestly, rather than creating ridiculous innuendos on the margins.

(By the way, “unclean hands” is a legal doctrine without application in this context. Moreover, supporting Castro (as opposed to, say, Batista) has nothing to do with Stalinism. Just thought you should know.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beagle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/85f322/32.png) [@Beagle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beagle)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2003, 9:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/22 "2003-02-11T21:29:46Z")

</div>

[The imperialist plots his next move.](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2749755.stm)

I don’t understand how a group of people could bring up things against the United States, like charges of “imperialism,” and then get upset when the motivations of major players in the peace movement are examined.

What’s good for the United States government is not fair applied back to its detractors? That is not my idea of free speech.

Thanks, **lout** , you’re right. I’m all for convening hearings and issuing subpoenas. You have won the Beagle’s Corallary to Godwin’s Law Award. Bear it with pride.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hazel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e56c9b/32.png) [@Hazel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hazel)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2003, 9:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/23 "2003-02-11T21:46:56Z")

</div>

Am I missing something? Those of you who are calling these groups Stalinist, why that particular word? Are you using it as a synonym for communist? Are any of the US communist groups Stalinist? Or are they just plain communists? (That is, communists-by-philosphy who do not follow or revere any particular past communist leader.) Or perhaps Trotskyitess?

Whenever there’s an anti-war movement, communist and socialist groups are part of it. This does not mean everyone who is anti-war is a commie or socialist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2003, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/24 "2003-02-11T22:05:23Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Beagle \*  
> **I don’t understand how a group of people could bring up things against the United States, like charges of “imperialism,” and then get upset when the motivations of major players in the peace movement are examined.**

Who’s getting upset about that? I agreed with you that International ANSWER was Stalinist.

Going from that fact to asserting that Stalinists run the US anti-war movement, however, is completely unfounded. International ANSWER organized two mass demonstrations in October and January. UFPJ organized one for this Saturday. Organizing three demonstrations, regardless of size, is _not_ running the anti-war movement. Especially when you consider that ANSWER and UFPJ haven’t done much more than organize those three demonstrations.

I’m not upset about you, or anyone else, calling ANSWER Stalinist. Trying to tar the whole movement with the rest of that brush (unless I’m completely misreading “Stalinists Run US Peace Movement?”) because of ANSWER’s politics is what I object to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beagle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/85f322/32.png) [@Beagle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beagle)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2003, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/25 "2003-02-11T23:29:21Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Who’s getting upset about that? I agreed with you that International ANSWER was Stalinist.

You’ve been polite.  
I bristle at the whole “McCarthy” thing. When, in my first post, I say that I support anyone’s right to protest or even be a Stalinist - and predict it - _sigh_. I would never have dragged ordinary Americans in for questioning about their political beliefs. Now, as for Soviet spies…

**Lemur866** has it right. Just as conservatives are rightly criticized for speeches at Bob Jones University - peace activists should be questioned for tolerating Stalinists in their ranks.

**Hazel** , reread the first post, third paragraph in the quote. Read the last paragraph.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Olentzero](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/90ced4/32.png) [@Olentzero](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Olentzero)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2003, 1:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/26 "2003-02-12T01:41:06Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Beagle \*  
> **Just as conservatives are rightly criticized for speeches at Bob Jones University - peace activists should be questioned for tolerating Stalinists in their ranks.**

No they absolutely should _not_. For all ANSWER’s mistaken politics, for all the presumptions they grant themselves that they are “leaders” of the movement for being at the right place at the right time to pull off two very large, very successful demonstrations (but not much else), they have just as much right to be in the anti-war movement as any other group that opposes the war on a progressive basis. Solidarity is what keeps the movement strong, and the ability to openly argue out political and tactical differences is what keeps the movement going forward.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kniz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/c37758/32.png) [@kniz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kniz)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2003, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/27 "2003-02-12T03:36:14Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _originally posted by Tee_  
> **Campaign for an alternative to global conflict and war - for a socialist world.**

In what OBL had to say, today, was a statement that his supporters should work with their “socialist” comrades in the fight against the infidel imperialists. However, he made plain that these “socialist comrades” were also infidels. So, in the end he will be coming after them. He is simply practicing the time honored tactic of divide and conquer.

> [@](#):
>
> _originally posted by Beagle_  
> \*\*Hey, did anyone hear the story that after Gulf War II: Unfinished Business ----available on a 24 hour news channel near you, the US is going to pull out of Saudi Arabia?..
> 
> I’ve thought pulling out was a good idea for a long time. The Saudi’s don’t want us there, it inflames the radical Muslims (Holy Land, etc), and we can’t use them for anything.\*\*

The story goes…If we liberate the Iraqi’s, OBL will use the desire of the masses to be liberated and go on the offensive against the ruling class in such countries as Saudi Arabia. To counteract this, the Saudis will want to get us out of the picture. As in the above concerning the “socialists” OBL is a master of turning any situation to his benefit.

> [@](#):
>
> _originally posted by lout_  
> **The pretense that anyone would suddenly decide not to participate in a peace demonstration after learning that some “stalinist” group was involved in organizing it, is just puerile.**

I cannot speak for **Beagle** but in my opinion if there is a demonstration that you are in agreement with, you should go and participate if you wish. However, you should know that their motives are not as pure as yours. What if sometime in the future they put on a demonstration that you are not really caught up in, will you maybe go and support them just because they were so right about the first demonstration. Of course, you wouldn’t do such a thing, but someone must because that is one of their motives and the source of “friendly travelers”.

[ul][sup] **Definition 1. of or relating to children or childhood.**

😛 Did you really mean **childish?** [/sup][/ul]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/a4c791/32.png) [@Zoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zoe)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 12:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/28 "2003-02-18T12:12:55Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Just as conservatives are rightly criticized for speeches at Bob Jones University - peace activists should be questioned for tolerating Stalinists in their ranks.

Beagle, I don’t hold all Conservatives responsible for the poor judgment or warped views of a few. As a whole, they have no control over who speaks at Bob Jones University. That is an individual choice.

The same is true for the peace activists. We have no control over who participtes in the movement. But even if we did, I can see no reason to exclude “Stalinists” since the cause is worth while.

I can see that you are making a real effort to be fair. If you want to be better informed about left-wing activities, right-wing sources are not the most credible. Look to a more moderate organization. One of the best sources that I use is Amnesty International. They were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize a few years ago. I find the Amnesty International USA website to be of particular interest.

Pax

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SentientMeat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/43a26b/32.png) [@SentientMeat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SentientMeat)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 12:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/29 "2003-02-18T12:27:25Z")

</div>

Unsurprisingly, Neo-Nazi’s and Stalinists have opinions on things other than Neo-Nazism and Stalinism.

Unsurprisingly, these often coincide with those of non-Nazis and non-Stalinists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RandySpears](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@RandySpears](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RandySpears)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 12:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/30 "2003-02-18T12:49:52Z")

</div>

This thread wouldnt have anything to do with my post about Stalin and Trotsky in another thread? 😉

Seriously though, this kind of reasoning has popped up a few times now. The first time i saw it some guy (not one of you, i hope?) claimed that ANSWER had organized the NY protest rally. Pressed for facts it showed that ANSWER at most tried to take some credit, and probably only advertized the rally on their web-site.

And **it still** boils down to if you wan’t to make the point that the majority of protesters are also out manifesting their lojalty with Stalinism and Kim-Jong Il. Well there, you just made 15 million people stalinist just so you can disregard their opposition to the war. Or else it may be that these marginal group jumps at the oportunity to capitilize off of the anti-war feelings.

Finally the original post contains a (quite typical) giant leap in going from speaking of past rallys, all (aledgedly) **organized**  
by Stalinists-by-association, to speaking of the new rally having a co-chair who is said to have a personal sympathy for Fidel Castro. Nowhere is it said this has ever been an official stance of (alleged) organizers UFP.

So there. Before claiming that the protest so and so, is really full of people sympathizing with so-and-so, id like to hear: Credible facts about which, including **all** , organizations that were involved in running the show. Credible witnesses that this was known to the protesters, i.e. for example speaches at the rally making it clear to protesters that they were not only participating in a peace rally, but also in a stalinist peace rally.

Without these facts, you know there’s really only a whole lot of people out there to show they don’t support the war.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![december](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/838e76/32.png) [@december](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/december)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 2:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/31 "2003-02-18T14:23:42Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by RandySpears \*  
> The first time i saw it some guy (not one of you, i hope?) claimed that ANSWER had organized the NY protest rally. Pressed for facts it showed that ANSWER at most tried to take some credit, and probably only advertized the rally on their web-site.

I do not believe the New York rally was organized by ANSWER. AFAIK it was organized by MoveOn.

However, it was part of a world-wide effort. When a New York demonstrator takes pride in the world-wide total of a million or more, it should be borne in mind that many of those people _were_ organized by ANSWER and had speakers representing ANSWER’s values.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RandySpears](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@RandySpears](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RandySpears)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 2:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/32 "2003-02-18T14:41:53Z")

</div>

december:

So if you are right in that the NY rally was organized by MoveOn it can for sure not have been (exlusively) organized by United For Peace and Justice (UFPJ), and it’s co-chair, the Castro-supporter. But now that is what the OP would seem to suggest, have a look! You just made my point, i believe. 🙂

Your second one: Firstly, i believe that the worldwide total is more like 15 mill than one mill. Secondly, the existance of a thousand stalinists among these 15 mill is no more suprising than the existance in a pro-war rally of 15 mill (had there been one) of a thousand KKK-supporters, or oklahoma-bombing sympathizers, or the League for turning arab middle east into a parking lot.

I know I have made this point elsewhere, but i think it’s worth making again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![december](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/838e76/32.png) [@december](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/december)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 2:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/33 "2003-02-18T14:51:55Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by RandySpears \*  
> Secondly, the existance of a thousand stalinists among these 15 mill is no more suprising than the existance in a pro-war rally of 15 mill (had there been one) of a thousand KKK-supporters, or oklahoma-bombing sympathizers, or the League for turning arab middle east into a parking lot.

Don’t forget that the Stalinists were in charge of many of these demonstrations. They chose the speakers and organized the themes.

A better analogy would be a KKK-led anti war march, where most of the demonstrators were not affiliated with the KKK.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RandySpears](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@RandySpears](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RandySpears)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/34 "2003-02-18T14:56:58Z")

</div>

december:

**What** demonstrations are you saying the Stalinists were in charge of? What organizations exactly organized these marches? How many did participate? Were there really speakers promoting Stalinism?

Enough false or unsupported claims have been made about this subject on this and other threads (see above) for you having to back that up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![even\_sven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/dfb087/32.png) [@even\_sven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/even_sven)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 4:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/35 "2003-02-18T16:12:46Z")

</div>

All it says about Stalinism in the actual article is one mention that they are a “Stalinist Communist” movement. It never alleges that they are actually Stalinists, but rather Communists in the Stalinist style. Somehow I doubt even that.

Let me repeat this. Nobody- save a few old Russins men (as in actual Russians in Russia who speak Russian and do nothing but Russian stuff)- likes Stalin. Modern Communism is no friend of Stalin or his ways. Communists are not Stalinists. Nobody likes Stalin. Nobody likes Stalin. Nobody is a Stalinist.

Even Saddam Hussain himself, who certainly apprciates how Stalin gained and held on to power, is not a Stalinist.

So if I hear that Stalinists run the US peace movement, I’m going to dismiss that as reactionary BS. Now if people want to tell me that modern Communists support and organize for peace, I’ll talk to you about Communism and peace and why that isn’t such a bad combination.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beagle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/85f322/32.png) [@Beagle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beagle)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/36 "2003-02-18T16:32:44Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> All it says about Stalinism in the actual article is one mention that they are a “Stalinist Communist” movement. It never alleges that they are actually Stalinists, but rather Communists in the Stalinist style. Somehow I doubt even that.

Tomato, tomAto.

> [@](#):
>
> Let me repeat this. Nobody- save a few old Russins men (as in actual Russians in Russia who speak Russian and do nothing but Russian stuff)- likes Stalin. Modern Communism is no friend of Stalin or his ways. Communists are not Stalinists. Nobody likes Stalin. Nobody likes Stalin. Nobody is a Stalinist.
> 
> Even Saddam Hussain himself, who certainly apprciates how Stalin gained and held on to power, is not a Stalinist.
> 
> So if I hear that Stalinists run the US peace movement, I’m going to dismiss that as reactionary BS. Now if people want to tell me that modern Communists support and organize for peace, I’ll talk to you about Communism and peace and why that isn’t such a bad combination.

Sorry if I believe the evidence I presented over a Communist cheerleader claiming _nobody_ is a Stalinist. The WWP identifies with KJI. KJI is a Stalinist. Saddam loves Stalin so much he has the look and the philosophy, in addition to the brutality.

When the facts are against you, pretend like they don’t exist? I guess if communists had their way all this reactionary debating would end anyway. Facts will be what we make them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RandySpears](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@RandySpears](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RandySpears)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/37 "2003-02-18T17:24:07Z")

</div>

I agree that the difference between being a communist of the stalinist variety and being a stalinist is a subtle one.

But what is this article you are talking about? I earlier requested some proof of rallys being run by stalinists and if this really took place i’d be interested to read about it!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RandySpears](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@RandySpears](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RandySpears)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/38 "2003-02-18T17:28:12Z")

</div>

I looked above, and all i saw was a reference to the WWP organizing **earlier** peace rallies (unspecified which ones, and how many protesters).

In this context that amounts to nothing.

Link please!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Beagle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/85f322/32.png) [@Beagle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Beagle)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/39 "2003-02-18T17:55:24Z")

</div>

I was looking around when I had time.

One editorial outlining some of the long-term relationships between the [old guard Stalinists](http://www.brookesnews.com/031502peacerally.html) and their new, improved Marxist-Leninist anti-war whatever.

> [@](#):
>
> The organisation is ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism) which is a spin-off from the IAC (International Action Center) of which the anti-American Ramsey Clark is closely involved. (Clark also serves as a legal counsel for Saddam’s vicious regime. He also defended PLO leaders against a suit brought by the family of Leon Klinghoffer, the elderly tourist who was murdered by Palestinian terrorists and whose body was thrown overboard from the hijacked Achille Lauro cruise-ship in 1986). The IAC in turn is controlled by the anti-semitic Marxist-Leninist WWP (Workers World Party). In addition, the WWP runs the KTC (Korea Truth Commission), a front organisation for Kim Jong-il. (Great company for an Archbishop to keep, don’t you think?)
> 
> The WWP supported the 1956 Soviet suppression of the Hungarian revolution, the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia, the 1979 invasion of Afghanistan and Beijing’s, massacre of students in Tiananmen Square. Since the collapse of communism, this group of fanatical Marxist-Leninists have largely devoted themselves to defending North Korea and Saddam’s regime. This support is also quite profitable, allowing WWP leaders, who have no apparent source of income, to frequently fly to Pyongyang and Baghdad where they are very well treated indeed.

[On Ramsey Clark](http://shadow.autono.net/sin001/clark.htm) If this site scares you, check the facts, as I have. Slate has done a similar piece.

[Alternet](http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=14189)

> [@](#):
>
> **International Action Center (IAC): A Ramsey Clark-led activist group that, behind the scenes, is actually controlled by the Workers World Party. The IAC has managed to attract support broader than its roots, but it still raises the interesting question of how _fans of Stalin_ can plausibly claim to be the nation’s preeminent “peace” group.** Their focus in recent years has also been on Mumia and anti-racism work, but the IAC and especially former U.S. Attorney General (under Johnson) Clark have been in the forefront of challenges to U.S.-led sanctions against Iraq. They’ve called for a “National Day of Action” and a large protest in Washington D.C. on Oct. 27, the weekend before elections. Hard to imagine that Ramsey Clark and John Ashcroft held the same office. [bolding, italics mine]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RandySpears](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/858c86/32.png) [@RandySpears](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RandySpears)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2003, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317/40 "2003-02-18T18:06:10Z")

</div>

While reading your post several times i just can’t seem to find the place where it says which peace rallies (if any) these organisations organised last saturday.

This point i’ve made time and time again here, and on other threads. Still no reply.

The ANSWER issue has been discussed by me and others above, and elsewere. Please have a look.

Now if you have any concrete evidence proving that stalinists played a major (or any) role in organizing protests this last saturday, provide them.

Else check up on your facts. And stop spreading urban myths.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/um-stalinists-run-us-peace-movement-would-that-be-bad/154317.md?page=3)
