Actually, after they made that ruling they reversed themselves - because of the public outcry. You’re right about the fine though, the fine I was thinking of - $375,000 - was for another incident, involving an FM radio station.
And, everton, HBO is small, has limited distribution and not subject to federal regulation the way the broadcast networks are.
Although this rule may hold generally, there are exceptions. There are several well-known institutions that call themselves “Colleges”, yet have respected graduate programs (Boston College and Dartmouth College spring to mind). On the other hand, some smaller “Universities” have no graduate students (e.g. DePauw University).
Ever since I started reading this thread I’ve been trying eating with my fork “eurostyle”. One thing I noticed is that my fork definitely has a top (the prettily decorated side) and a bottom (the side that’s been stamped with the manufacturer and displays the “negative” of the decorations). Holding it in the european manner definitely displays its “less attractive” side to the room.
So - do European forks have the same attribute, or are they made so that both sides have “attractive” decorations?
I suspect this is more a function of cheap flatware, but I can’t say for sure–the only American flatware I have is cheap stamped stuff that has an unattractive reverse side, while the only European flatware I have is higher quality and looks good on the reverse side. However, I suspect that the more upscale American patterns would also have a more attractive reverse side.
Without meaning any offense, I would be surprised if many Americanisms hadn’t slipped over the boarder to the “51st state”. Remember that beer ad in which the ranter went on about all the Americanisms that were invading?
And you have repeatedly mischaracterized what his impression is. His impression includes exactly the admissions you have made yourself.
Not ever. Names of deceased members may be reused by new members.
So you write seconds:minutes:hours? and 5 c.m. 2 m. instead of 2 m. 5 c.m.?
Not true. There are “colleges” that offer graduate degrees. There is in practice no difference between a college and a university except that on average, institutions that use the word “college” in their names tend to be smaller that those that use “university.” A university may also have academic subdivisions called “colleges,” but that’s different use of the word.
Sigh. Ascenray, I didn’t “admit” anything. I agreed with him. My only interest was to show a different viewpoint - that mass media isn’t indicitive of everyday life. I’m not trying to argue. I apologize for not being more clear.
All my forks are plain. I don’t recall seeing decorated forks outside of an antique shop.
Touché.
I suppose the only (weak) defense I can give is that there’s at least an ordering consistency. Smaller => larger or larger => smaller, rather than mixing up.
I’m sure every nation has it’s odd folk traditions but I bet only America has…
Groundhog Day!
(You may be aware of it because of the Bill Murray film of the same name)
On Feb 2 a groundhog (a large den-living rodent) pops out of his burrow and, if he sees his shadow, there will be six more weeks of winter. If he doesn’t, Spring will come early. He’s seen his shadow 104 times out of the last 118 years.
“The” groundhog is called Punxsutawney Phil (Punks-a-tawny) since he lives in the town of Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania. His annual appearance makes the national news here.
Traditionally, it can be any groundhog that anyone notices popping out of his hole in any locality in the United States on Feb. 2. Somehow, Punxatawney, Pa., has managed to make its “official” groundhog sighting a national event. I believe that the name “Punxatawney Phil” has been given to several different groundhogs.
That’s obviously true, but boofy_bloke had asked whether it was true that Americans only watch films about other Americans, which they don’t. I just suggested a possible reason why some people might make that incorrect assumption, I wasn’t pointing out another Americanism.
That’s irrelevant. The point is that finding profanity offensive isn’t a distinctly American characteristic, it’s a characteristic of people who find profanity offensive. You’ll find Americans who pepper their conversation with swear words and people in other countries who are offended by them.
Georgia’s own groundhog, General Beauregard Lee, did not see his shadow and predicts an early spring. And very welcome that will be too, as it is 34 degrees and raining today.
Many countries refer to their state-funded schools as “public”, or some local equivalent of the word, to distinguish them form private schools, and many (most?) of them don’t wear uniforms.
Quick question: after the Bono boo-boo, a law is being introduced into Congress to remove the FCC’s discretion in such matters and to increase fines for such cases. Do other countries still have such laws?
Yep - I’d missed the reversal. The radio incident might be this one, where the total fine was $755,000, made up of 26 incidents each attracting the maximum $27,500 fine.
The UK has OFCOM, which is dedicated to such matters - http://www.ofcom.org.uk/ . Basically, ‘adult’ content is restricted to after 9pm, with an expectation that anything beyond mild nudity and limited swearing be kept beyond 10pm. AFAIK, OFCOM has the ability to fine TV companies for breaches of its code of conduct, which include other things such as misrepresentation and breaches of privacy. But there’s little question that a fair bit of primetime TV would raise a few eyebrows in the US.
In some ways it’s strange - in terms of social mores the US seems to trail Europe by a generation or so, but in these areas we seem to be even more resistant. The public reaction to Jackson’s half-time show is a good indicator of that. Watching old Benny Hill and Monty Python skits gives me the impression that that wouldn’t have raised any eyebrows in the UK.