As heavy as this is, I accept it. The words are one thing and the slices of time are another. The analogy I always tried to adapt my thinking to was when I worked in Sales Forecasting. Our methods for predicting the future involved looking at progressively nearer slices of the past.
But somebody pointed out that predicting the future based on the past is like driving a car on a winding mountain road by looking in the rearview mirror.
The same applies, though in a subtler way, by trying to predict the immediate past! As the future slides past now into the then of the past, our viewpoint shifts and we have to factor into our view of the past by what has just finished happening.
Now.
No, dammit, I was too early. So . . . now!
Damn, did it again. Now.
Fuck, this time I’ll wait a while.
.
.
.
Ok, ready? . . . uh . . . now.
Shit. I give up.
Perhaps this deserves its own thread (or looking up those older threads where it has been the main topic) but I’d like somebody (you perhaps, Meatros) to elaborate on this statement.
I know that Time is that thing that clocks measure, and that it’s somehow a measurement of change or process. But to say it’s an illusion is like saying Reality is an illusion, to my way of thinking.