# Upper Middle Class: A Separate Entity from the Middle Class?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 20, 2014, 7:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813 "2014-02-20T19:09:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![skdo23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a5b964/32.png) [@skdo23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/skdo23)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2014, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/81 "2014-03-25T20:32:41Z")

</div>

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> Although I looked it up and both Shaq and Wyc Grousbeck, owner of the Boston Celtics and the last person to sign Shaq’s checks are both worth about $350 million.

Yes, but Shaq earned $350 million by joining, and succeeding in, the NBA. Grousbeck was able to “join” the NBA and indulge his love of sports because he is worth $350 million. i.e. Shaq got _rich_ by joining in the NBA, Grousbeck joined the NBA because he is _wealthy_. Their relative net worths are irrelevant to the distinction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2014, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/82 "2014-03-25T22:30:22Z")

</div>

The question I would ask is, “Who gives a rat’s ass?” This constant focus on slicing and dicing the population into classes and putting everyone into little compartments is counter-productive and divisive.

It’s much more important to focus on A) helping the truly destitute B) improving labor and income mobility, and C) ensuring that there is opportunity to move up from even the lowest levels.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThisUsernameIsForbidden](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b4bc9f/32.png) [@ThisUsernameIsForbidden](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThisUsernameIsForbidden)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2014, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/83 "2014-03-25T22:37:37Z")

</div>

I think the discussion of who fits into what category, Sam, might be beneficial for tax purposes, for example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2014, 11:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/84 "2014-03-25T23:27:15Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> The question I would ask is, “Who gives a rat’s ass?” This constant focus on slicing and dicing the population into classes and putting everyone into little compartments is counter-productive and divisive.

It’s pretty important to any kind of sociological analysis. Whether and how the upper-middle class is distinguishable from the middle is an important question in thinking about the shape of any society where such classes arguably exist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![msmith537](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d9b06d/32.png) [@msmith537](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/msmith537)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2014, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/85 "2014-03-26T15:42:00Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> The question I would ask is, “Who gives a rat’s ass?” This constant focus on slicing and dicing the population into classes and putting everyone into little compartments is counter-productive and divisive.
> 
> It’s much more important to focus on A) helping the truly destitute B) improving labor and income mobility, and C) ensuring that there is opportunity to move up from even the lowest levels.

Well, “class” becomes important when you try to help the destitute, improve labor, increase income mobility and ensure opportunity to move up for a number of reasons. Many of the obstacles to doing this take the form of learned behaviors or institutionalized segregation that keeps people stuck in the same socioeconomic group they grew up with.

Case in point, someone growing up in a trailer park or inner city ghetto will probably not get the same opportunities to attend private schools and top notch universities that the children of affluent lawyers and investment bankers have. Not only that, they might not even be aware those opportunities even exist. And even if they were aware and did manage to attend those schools, often they aren’t in tune with many of the behaviors and social customs they will need to be successful in that environment.

If you don’t understand the nature of the barriers that separate people into classes, it makes it very difficult to break them down.

And lets not pretend there aren’t different classes of people. A highly educated doctor or lawyer is not in the same “class” as a high school drop-out grocery clerk. So lets not pretend that they have or even should have the same opportunities. What matters is if the grocery clerk has the ability to educate himself to become a doctor or lawyer if he has the desire and ability.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2014, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/86 "2014-03-26T15:57:00Z")

</div>

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> Well, “class” becomes important when you try to help the destitute, improve labor, increase income mobility and ensure opportunity to move up for a number of reasons.

Remember who you’re talking to; I doubt **Sam** accepts the value of such things, at least as government business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2014, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/87 "2014-03-26T16:28:37Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> The question I would ask is, “Who gives a rat’s ass?” This constant focus on slicing and dicing the population into classes and putting everyone into little compartments is counter-productive and divisive.
> 
> It’s much more important to focus on A) helping the truly destitute B) improving labor and income mobility, and C) ensuring that there is opportunity to move up from even the lowest levels.

So, planning to write a nasty letter to most airlines, are you?

The concept of class didn’t get invented by 20th or even 19th century liberals. There is some stuff in Aristotle which could qualify.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2014, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/88 "2014-03-26T17:34:51Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> It’s much more important to focus on A) helping the truly destitute B) improving labor and income mobility, and C) ensuring that there is opportunity to move up from even the lowest levels.

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Remember who you’re talking to; I doubt **Sam** accepts the value of such things, at least as government business.

Arguing past one another like this seems particularly counter-productive - I mean that was only four posts ago **BG**. I mean the devil is in the details ( and I often don’t agree with **Sam** ’s ), but you’re _starting in the same place_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2014, 5:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/89 "2014-03-26T17:58:10Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> So, planning to write a nasty letter to most airlines, are you?
> 
> The concept of class didn’t get invented by 20th or even 19th century liberals. There is some stuff in Aristotle which could qualify.

Come to think of it, shouldn’t sociologists have a standard model by now?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2014, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/90 "2014-03-26T18:02:47Z")

</div>

> [@Tamerlane](#):
>
> Arguing past one another like this seems particularly counter-productive - I mean that was only four posts ago **BG**. I mean the devil is in the details ( and I often don’t agree with **Sam** ’s ), but you’re _starting in the same place_.

My bad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2014, 7:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/91 "2014-03-26T19:00:52Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Come to think of it, shouldn’t sociologists have a standard model by now?

Sociologists? They make _economists_ look like chemists, in terms of being a well-founded science.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2014, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/92 "2014-03-26T19:56:29Z")

</div>

> [@Evil\_Captor](#):
>
> Sociologists? They make _economists_ look like chemists, in terms of being a well-founded science.

Still, it’s the closest thing we’ve **got** to a science in this field, unless you count Marxism as one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2014, 10:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813/93 "2014-03-26T22:17:06Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Come to think of it, shouldn’t sociologists have a standard model by now?

[Started GQ thread.](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=719334)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/upper-middle-class-a-separate-entity-from-the-middle-class/681813.md?page=4)
