# US Idiom: "set foot" vs "step foot".

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [August 1, 2010, 11:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837 "2010-08-01T23:56:23Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2010, 11:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/1 "2010-08-01T23:56:23Z")

</div>

A common idiom I’ve heard and used for 40+ years to express disapproval is “I’d never set foot in [insert place name here].” e.g. “I’d never set foot in Denny’s; their food & service are awful.” “I’d never set foot in a Baptist church; they’re no fun.” etc.

Over all the years & all the various places I’ve lived I’ve also heard many other people use the same idiom.

Here on the SDMB I’ve read some posts where some people use “step foot” instead. “I’d never step foot in a Walmart. The other customers are too skeevy.” etc.

I have never heard a live person say “step foot” though. And it sounds really wrong, bordering on meaningless, to me. I suspect they think the same of folks who say “set foot” though.  
So which do you use? how old are you and from where? Which do you hear where you are now? Where is that? Does anyone know of any real academic linguistic research on the topic?

Me? I’m in my fifties & grew up in SoCal. I’ve lived in the West, South, & now Midwest, plus travelled a lot in the bigger cities throughout the US.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/2 "2010-08-02T00:56:49Z")

</div>

I put “step foot in” in the same category as “for all intensive purposes”. That is, something to be corrected, once I can stop giggling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Superhal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b4bc9f/32.png) [@Superhal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Superhal)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/3 "2010-08-02T01:00:48Z")

</div>

Ug. I didn’t know it was multiple choice. I both do and hear “set foot,” but “step foot” in the negative sounds good to me, although I doubt I’ll ever use it.

Imho, my WAG is “step foot” could be used as a critique of something you’ve done:

I’ll never step foot in there _again._

while “set foot” could be used to show inexperience:

I’ve never set foot in there (ever).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 6:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/4 "2010-08-02T06:17:09Z")

</div>

I don’t see any reason it needs to be corrected. It still makes perfect sense, unlike “all intensive purposes.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 12:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/5 "2010-08-02T12:48:33Z")

</div>

Something on the order of 50 votes and 3 whole comments. Leave it to me to ask a real crowd pleaser …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/6 "2010-08-02T14:13:36Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> I don’t see any reason it needs to be corrected. It still makes perfect sense, unlike “all intensive purposes.”

You don’t step your feet. You step.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rayman5321](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/85f322/32.png) [@rayman5321](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rayman5321)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 9:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/7 "2010-08-02T21:58:21Z")

</div>

Set Foot.

It’s like people who say “chester drawers” instead of “chest of drawers” and “ration of shit” instead of “rash of shit”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rushgeekgirl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rushgeekgirl/32/3715_2.png) [@Rushgeekgirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rushgeekgirl)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 10:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/8 "2010-08-02T22:24:38Z")

</div>

I hear both and probably use both, but I’d be more likely to say “set foot”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Serenata67](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/serenata67/32/10646_2.png) [@Serenata67](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Serenata67)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 10:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/9 "2010-08-02T22:32:59Z")

</div>

Set foot, all the way.

I prefer not to set foot in the house of someone who says things like “all intensive purposes” and “step foot.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fighting\_ignorant](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ac8455/32.png) [@fighting\_ignorant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fighting_ignorant)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 10:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/10 "2010-08-02T22:39:33Z")

</div>

> [@rayman5321](#):
>
> Set Foot.
> 
> It’s like people who say “chester drawers” instead of “chest of drawers” and “ration of shit” instead of “rash of shit”.

Wait: “rash of shit”? Never heard that one. Whatsit mean?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SpoilerVirgin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/4491bb/32.png) [@SpoilerVirgin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SpoilerVirgin)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/11 "2010-08-02T22:40:54Z")

</div>

I say and hear set foot. In keeping with this thread, the other day I saw a sidewalk sign advertising the services of a medium – she can tell your “pass, present and future.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 10:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/12 "2010-08-02T22:53:26Z")

</div>

You know, so you can win at craps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Silver\_Fire](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a88e4f/32.png) [@Silver\_Fire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Silver_Fire)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2010, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/13 "2010-08-02T23:06:40Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> I put “step foot in” in the same category as “for all intensive purposes”.

Every time I see “for all intensive purposes” in print (I’ve never heard it IRL), I imagine a platypus. I don’t know why.

I probably need some kind of help.

> [@rayman5321](#):
>
> “ration of shit” instead of “rash of shit”.

That’s WRONG? I’ve never heard “rash of shit”; I don’t even know what that means.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Karen\_Lingel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/karen_lingel/32/18649_2.png) [@Karen\_Lingel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Karen_Lingel)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2010, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/14 "2010-08-03T00:36:56Z")

</div>

Bug-ugly / butt-ugly

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2010, 1:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/15 "2010-08-03T01:55:11Z")

</div>

> [@rayman5321](#):
>
> Set Foot.
> 
> It’s like people who say “chester drawers” instead of “chest of drawers” and “ration of shit” instead of “rash of shit”.

Another vote that “ration of shit” is correct and “rash of shit” is wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Superhal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b4bc9f/32.png) [@Superhal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Superhal)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2010, 2:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/16 "2010-08-03T02:14:30Z")

</div>

After more thought, I think it’s an overgeneralization error:

I’ll never _set foot in_ there again.

I’ll never _step in_ there again.

set foot in + step in = step foot in.

When you have two expressions that mean almost the same thing, it’s very common for people to combine them and it will sound decent to a native speaker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SanVito](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sanvito/32/2805_2.png) [@SanVito](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SanVito)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2010, 7:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/17 "2010-08-03T07:31:54Z")

</div>

100% Set foot in.

I don’t think it’s a _ **US** _ idiom, by the way. Unless you’re referring to the ‘step foot in’ bit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThirdOne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@ThirdOne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThirdOne)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2010, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/18 "2010-08-03T21:16:53Z")

</div>

set foot is all I have ever heard and said.

Ration of shit. Never heard rash.

I’m mid-50’s west-coaster.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![palindromemordnilap](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/db5fbb/32.png) [@palindromemordnilap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/palindromemordnilap)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2010, 9:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/19 "2010-08-03T21:49:38Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> I don’t see any reason it needs to be corrected. It still makes perfect sense, unlike “all intensive purposes.”

It’s supposed to be “intensive porpoises,” right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peremensoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ce7236/32.png) [@Peremensoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peremensoe)\
**Post date:** [August 3, 2010, 11:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837/20 "2010-08-03T23:46:11Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> > [@BigT](#):
> >
> > I don’t see any reason it needs to be corrected. It still makes perfect sense, unlike “all intensive purposes.”
> 
> You don’t step your feet. You step.

Meh. In some dialects, one reaches one’s hand, so maybe one can step one’s foot. However, I think **Superhal** is correct on the origin.

Also, for some it’s a “raft” of shit.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/us-idiom-set-foot-vs-step-foot/548837.md?page=2)
