Just because you have to do research doesn’t mean it’s a research degree. My Ed.D. program is requiring a 40,000 word dissertation (although as someone pointed out this is equivalent to JD requirements :dubious: ). The Ph.D. is THE research terminal degree in the U.S. but I think you raise two excellent points.
-
How much research is an attorny expected to do? At the higher levels of law is it mostly research with little practice?
-
There is a growing mixture of doctoral programs - Ph.D. programs that require practicum classes and professional doctoral degrees that require research.
You are correct. My mind wasn’t working without coffee. “Legal Letters” was the term some came up with to explain the two Ls. The two Ls of course come from the Latin usage of doubling a letter to indicate the plural as in pp for pages or LL for laws.
I still stand by my contention that an MD is a second level degree and hence equivalent to a master’s degree. I think the confusion is that the “doctoral work” an MD does is in their residency which of course does not earn a degree. I think it is a convienent lie to say an MD is a doctoral degree because underlying that is knowing after they’ve been a resident that they truly have done doctoral level practicum work.
Lastly, some more first professional degrees (master’s level) labeled as doctorates were given. It makes you wonder, what ever happened to the bachelor -> master -> doctor standard.