[QUOTE=Magiver]
You CANNOT shout someone down and you cannot disrupt someone else’s right to free speech. And you can absolutely be arrested for breaching the peace. It happens every day. If I’m walking down the sidewalk talking to someone and you follow me screaming your opinion you are interrupting MY freedom to be heard. If I’m sitting in my house and you drive by with a boom box you are breaching the peace.
[/QUOTE]
What does any of that have to do with protesting outside the convention?
Which has fuck all to to do with anything I said. If I want to stand outside the entrance to the conventions with a picket sign and chant slogans, it can hardly be compared to invading a courtroom and back-sassing the judge. But you knew that.
You are in favor of shutting down all dissent by those who oppose your politics. We get it. But you don’t get to unleash an unholy army of straw men to knock down just because it is inconvenient to argue what I am actually talking about.
[QUOTE=Fear Itself]
What does any of that have to do with protesting outside the convention?
Which has fuck all to to do with anything I said. If I want to stand outside the entrance to the conventions with a picket sign and chant slogans, it can hardly be compared to invading a courtroom and back-sassing the judge. But you knew that.
You are in favor of shutting down all dissent by those who oppose your politics. We get it. But you don’t get to unleash an unholy army of straw men to knock down just because it is inconvenient to argue what I am actually talking about.
[/QUOTE]
My unholy army of strawmen come from the land of reality. All I’ve done is spell out the you don’t have the right to stand in front of a convention for the reasons given. The protesting zones have already been established and will be enforced. Nothing that you say or do is going to change that.
[QUOTE=Magiver]
My unholy army of strawmen come from the land of reality. All I’ve done is spell out the you don’t have the right to stand in front of a convention for the reasons given.
[/QUOTE]
So what was all that nonsense about invading courtrooms or chasing people down the streets?
[QUOTE=Weirddave]
I doubt RTF would have noticed anyway, he gets his “news” from whatever leftist blog he happens to be reading, I doubt they’d feature it.
[/QUOTE]
And Weirddave, who gets his “food” from dumpsters, read this story in which issue of the Baltimore Sun that he found in the dumpster?
[QUOTE=Fear Itself]
So what was all that nonsense about invading courtrooms or chasing people down the streets?
[/QUOTE]
You’re the one that said you had freedom to protest yet you acknowledge there are limits and those limits are, for this discussion, limited to peaceable assembly. That means you don’t have the right to disturb others. I gave examples for you to follow.
[QUOTE=Fear Itself]
That’s what they told Rosa Parks.
[/QUOTE]
Rosa Parks wasn’t disturbing anyone. She was fighting Jim Crowe laws. And apparently you are now acknowledging how our laws are practiced and wish to change the law. Best of luck in your endeavors.
[QUOTE=tagos]
I’m simply not interested in your petty legalisms. In a democracy the right of a people to protest peacefully should not be constrained.
[/QUOTE]
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!
What a good thing it’s my petty legalisms that, you know… actually matter, and not your personally-crafted ideas of how things should be.
So, good luck with your personal vision. And in the real world, things will go on as the law requires.
You are in favor of shutting down all dissent by those who oppose your politics. We get it. But you don’t get to unleash an unholy army of straw men to knock down just because it is inconvenient to argue what I am actually talking about.
[/QUOTE]
This thread is about the Democrats seeking to shut down dissent. Is it really the case that the people protesting the DNC are the ones who “oppose [his] politics?”
[QUOTE=Fear Itself]
Shouting slogans outside a venue is not breach of peace. If you find that disruptive, that is your problem. My right to express my dissent is guaranteed by the First Amendment, and you cannot restrict that right simply because you find my dissent disruptive. If I do not interfere with your access to the venue, and I demonstrate peacefully in a public space, the fact that you find that to be annoying is of no consequence.
[/QUOTE]
OK. Exercise that right. Pluck it off the tree on which you feel it grows. Let’s see how well that works for you.
I inadvertently posted this quote from Weirddave’s link without comment earlier:
Assuming that the Dems have rented the whole facility, including parking lots, I’m kinda curious, Weirddave, why you think that protesters have a right of access to those parking lots.
[QUOTE=RTFirefly]
And Weirddave, who gets his “food” from dumpsters, read this story in which issue of the Baltimore Sun that he found in the dumpster?
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Bricker]
OK. Exercise that right. Pluck it off the tree on which you feel it grows. Let’s see how well that works for you.
[/QUOTE]
Were I in the area, I might take you up on that. I predict I would be arrested, then released a few hours later with reduced or no charges. That sound about right? Small price to pay for freedom.
[QUOTE=Weirddave] I started this thread after reading the YAHOO news/TIME article I linked in the OP.
[/QUOTE]
You suggested I hadn’t already been aware of this story because of my allegedly limited reading list. So let’s do a test: if I had been reading the Baltimore Sun, when would I have come across this story?
[QUOTE=RTFirefly]
You suggested I hadn’t already been aware of this story because of my allegedly limited reading list. So let’s do a test: if I had been reading the Baltimore Sun, when would I have come across this story?
[/QUOTE]
I don’t know. Actually, I have no idea why you would want to read that rag in the first place. I’m kinda missing whatever point you think you’re making here.
What a good thing it’s my petty legalisms that, you know… actually matter, and not your personally-crafted ideas of how things should be.
So, good luck with your personal vision. And in the real world, things will go on as the law requires.
[/QUOTE]
My interest in your petty legalisms are, unsurprisingly, not affected by your admittedly uncanny impression of a 9 year old. What does remain is the age old distinction between what is right and what is legal. What is right is that in a democracy leaders should not be shielded from the peaceful public expression of dissent.
I do love these threads where conservatives (which Weirddave is no matter what party affiliation he claims) find Dems doing something Republicans were called out on on these boards for in the past and then pre-emptively level charges of hypocrisy, only to discover the brainwashed libruhls actually oppose the principle regardless of partisan politics. It’s good theater. Please continue to post these OPs.
FTR, evil liberal here who’s against the idea of “free speech zones” whether they’re implemented by the McCain or Obama camp. But you probably could have guessed that.
[QUOTE=woodstockbirdybird]
I do love these threads where conservatives (which Weirddave is no matter what party affiliation he claims)
[/quote]
I’m a conservative Democrat, never made any bones about it. Party affiliation /= political philosophy.
[QUOTE=woodstockbirdybird]
find Dems doing something Republicans were called out on on these boards for in the past and then pre-emptively level charges of hypocrisy, only to discover the brainwashed libruhls actually oppose the principle regardless of partisan politics. It’s good theater. Please continue to post these OPs.
[/quote]
Yea, except the national news article I quoted was two days old when I posted my OP and there wasn’t a peep from anyone on the boards about it. Last election cycle the outrage over the Republicans doing the same thing was monumental and immediate. You (royal you from here on out) can say after the fact “Oh, yea, we don’t like that either” after I’ve called you on it, but you’d be full of shit, as usual. You don’t give a shit about anything but what your partisan political masters tell you to think, and will roll naked through broken glass to suck a diseased dog’s cock to ensure that “your guys” get elected, completely ignoring that in their gratitude they promptly roll you over and fuck you up the ass with great enthusiasm.
[QUOTE=woodstockbirdybird]
FTR, evil liberal here who’s against the idea of “free speech zones” whether they’re implemented by the McCain or Obama camp. But you probably could have guessed that.
[/QUOTE]
I don’t believe you. Not one little bit. When Republicans do something it’s unmitigated evil. When Democrats do the same thing it’s common sense, and a few weak denials after the fact when your hypocrisies are pointed out won’t change that. Want to change my mind? Stop being a party whore and apply your standards to both sides equally. Stop pretending that one side is “good” and the other “evil” and admit that they both sides want nothing more than power and money and will do anything to get it. Stop being a toady and start thinking for yourself, drop blind loyalty to any party and judge each issue and candidate on it’s/their individual merits. You want to be a liberal, be a liberal, but be loyal to your ideals and not to one party or another.
I started this thread after reading the YAHOO news/TIME article I linked in the OP.