Utah judge strikes down same-sex marriage ban!

They already have an amendment to their state constitution. That’s what the case is about.

I am struck by the many images, over the years, of happy couples celebrating judicial and legislative progress in this matter. If someone didn’t know the reason behind the celebration, wouldn’t they conclude that this is a good thing because so many are happy?

I wonder where the sour faces are of those who are adversely affected. Could the lack of those be due to the lack of seriously adverse effects? “My neighbor’s gay and I’m bummed out.” Not exactly newsworthy, eh?

To be honest, I had no idea a case was even in the courts, that’s what’s so shocking about this. I’m in CA so I followed the Prop 8 trial and appeal but I didn’t even know someone challenged in Utah. When did this case start, was it after the DOMA and Prop 8 decision last year? I’m surprised it didn’t get more attention

What I read is that after the Supreme Court decision this summer, dozens of lawsuits have been filed in state and federal courts around the country challenging same-sex marriage bans.

I’ll be interested to see when the number of states permitting SSM exceeds 25, or when more than half the population lives in a state that permits it. Neither milestone has any legal standing, of course, but it will be another sign of the change coming.

Go, Utah! :slight_smile: Show the rest of us how progressive you really are! It’s not the end of the world, really. It’ll be okay, Utah. Take some deep breaths, count to ten, have a nice soothing bowl of… Jell-o or something.

Maybe some other borderline-SSM states will start falling into line now. Because good grief, who wants to go down in history for having taken longer than UTAH to get with the program. Awkward!

It’s kind of cool to witness the line of dominoes falling, as SSM gains momentum. I wonder if there’s a bookie somewhere taking bets on which state will be dead last?

Huh. That’s not what the article linked to in the OP said - but you’re definitely right. All the other articles I’m seeing online say it was a constitutional amendment that was struck. Way to go, Utah! (Or rather, US 10th.)

I remember just a few years ago I was playing trivia at a local bar with some friends. The trivia announcer guy asks: “There are currently six states that allow gay marriage. Name those six states.” As we’re all putting our heads together trying to figure out which states to put down, I jokingly said: “Utah!” to which, everybody in the group laughed.

Imagine that!

Bonus: Just a few short years ago, only six states in the union allowed gay marriage!

In a move that possibly has surprised no one, Shelby has denied the State’s request for a stay on his decision.

And it could be a couple of weeks until the 10th Circuit responds to a stay request, now that the procedural way is cleared for one by Judge Shelby’s refusal. So it’s quite likely that just about every gay couple in Utah who wants to get married is going to do so, which will make overturning the decision problematic, at best. There’s a significant difference between preventing theoretical marriages and rescinding actual ones.

I don’t think any marriages would be rescinded, even if the ruling is overturned. Here in California, all couples who were married during the brief period when gay marriage was legalized the first time (before Proposition 8) remained married after Prop. 8 passed. The change in the law only affected ‘new’ marriages. not ‘existing’ ones. There’s no reason to think things would be any different in Utah.

What are the chances the 10th District Court institutes a stay over Judge Shelby’s ruling? They did that in California with Prop 8 right? Then again, the judge in California was a state judge and this guy Shelby is part of the District Court. It would be like the 10th District overturning itself, wouldn’t it?

I think this sets a great precedent like jayjay said. Rescinding actual marriages is much different than preventing theoretical ones. I hope the dominos all fall in other states in similar ways. No longer can people make the argument to deny people marriage to protect some hypothetical value when real people, real married couples, are being harmed by being forced to unmarry

Judge Walker who overturned Prop 8 stayed his own ruling.

Im hearing that that license offices in some counties are locking their doors? Still looking for a Cite…

There are a number of counties which are still not accepting

From the same article:

What all of this means:

Salt Lake Country, where SLC is located, is the most liberal in the state. Marriages are processing full steam ahead.

Utah County is home to Prove and Brigham Young University, and is the bastion of conservative Mormonism. They won’t start issuing licenses until the national guard is mobilized. The only redeeming factor is that it’s only 50 minutes away from Salt Lake County.

Cache County is home to Logan and USU, and fairly conservative as are the rest of those not issuing licenses. Washington County is home to St. George. It used to be a sleepy Mormon town, but times, they are a changin’.

I just emailed my sister to see if she and her partner have tied the knot. My sister and her common-law wife (he-he) had held a non-legal wedding ceremony (which my mother boycotted), legally adopted her partner’s last name (which my mother refuses to use in her will), and they had made all the legal arrangements, so I can’t see them not taking up this chance.

Here’s a graphicof the status of the various counties.

Isn’t that rather unusual? I’m no lawyer, but in my experience as an observer it’s typical for judges at this level to stay their own ruling when there’s a pretty good chance that it’s going to be re-litigated in a higher court (as this case almost certainly will be). Does anyone know if his honor gave a reason as to why he refused the stay?

You’re not kidding. There are so many people waiting to get married that they’re getting pizzas delivered to them - for free - by the Boy Scouts.

Let me repeat that: the Boy Scouts, members of that bastion of traditional homophobia, are delivering free pizzas to gay couples waiting to get married. In Utah.

I’m just off to Google whether cats and dogs are now living together and the End Times are upon us.

In a number of Doper households, as well as several of the factories where I’ve worked.

No reports available, does the year’s end count?

It’s such a shame Harold Camping isn’t alive to see this latest harbinger of our impending doom.

It is unusual.