# Utah Theater Cancels 'Brokeback Mountain', reneges licensing agreement

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 9, 2006, 12:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072 "2006-01-09T00:19:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dangerosa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/22d042/32.png) [@Dangerosa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dangerosa)\
**Post date:** [January 9, 2006, 7:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/21 "2006-01-09T19:01:18Z")

</div>

There is the bigger issue of not having your contract renewed. i.e. the distributor may decide not to do business with you in the future, and if that distributor releases next years blockbuster, you may have put your theatre into second run hell. If you are a franchise operation for a national chain, you could see your franchise license not renewed. If I were a local theatre owner, I’d be more concerned about the next contract than this one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DWMarch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dwmarch/32/1010_2.png) [@DWMarch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DWMarch)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 12:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/22 "2006-01-10T12:05:04Z")

</div>

I can’t see a film about gay cowboys being a big hit right in the heart of Mormon country regardless of this single theatre’s actions. I don’t think there’s really a need for theatre owners to refuse to show this movie… Devout Mormons would just avoid the film anyhow. Maybe the theatre owner has decided that since it’s a movie his local audience won’t be overly interested in it makes more financial sense to have a different movie playing. I have a feeling no theatre owner out there likes playing movies to an empty house.

By comparison, does anyone know which other movies are playing at this theatre? Is Bloodrayne being shown? How about Hostel? Plenty of unwholesomeness in those films but it’s the violent kind rather than the sexual kind. If the theatre owner doesn’t show Brokeback Mountain but does show Hostel I’d call him the worst kind of hypocrite. But I have a feeling it’s more about butts in seats rather than butts on screen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 12:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/23 "2006-01-10T12:41:15Z")

</div>

Why would you call him a hypocrite? So far, all I’ve seen is that the man’s basically bowing to community pressure. Perhaps you should call the pressure group hypocrites. As you said, it’s probably about filling the seats and the man’s only interest is ensuring his income.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 12:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/24 "2006-01-10T12:53:51Z")

</div>

According to [the IMDB](http://www.imdb.com/showtimes/location/sandy,ut), the following movies are playing at the Megaplex 17 in Sandy, Utah (bolding mine):  
[ul][li]Casanova ®[/li][li]Cheaper by the Dozen (PG)[/li][li]Désolation magnifique: Marcher sur la Lune (Unrated)[/li][li]Fun With Dick & Jane (PG-13)[/li][li]Grandma’s Boy ®[/li][li]Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (PG-13)[/li][li] **Hostel** ®[/li][li]King Kong (PG-13)[/li][li]Memoirs of a Geisha (PG-13)[/li][li]Munich ®[/li][li]Rumor Has It… (PG-13)[/li][li]Syriana ®[/li][li]The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (PG)[/li][li]The Family Stone (PG-13)[/li][li]The Magic of Flight (Unrated)[/li][li]The Producers (PG-13)[/li][li]The Ringer (PG-13)[/ul][/li]  
BTW, devout Mormons usually don’t attend R movies anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DWMarch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dwmarch/32/1010_2.png) [@DWMarch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DWMarch)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 1:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/25 "2006-01-10T13:04:22Z")

</div>

> [@Monty](#):
>
> Why would you call him a hypocrite? So far, all I’ve seen is that the man’s basically bowing to community pressure. Perhaps you should call the pressure group hypocrites. As you said, it’s probably about filling the seats and the man’s only interest is ensuring his income.

Well to be fair he would only be a hypocrite if he refuses to show Brokeback Mountain but has no objections to Hostel. Brokeback Mountain is about a consensual relationship between a couple of guys. Hostel is about the non-consensual torture of innocent people. Both should be equally offensive to his audience. Neither should have much of an audience in SLC. So IMO if the theatre owner shows one and not the other (because of concerns about the potential audience) he’s a hypocrite. If this were the case, I’d call him the worst kind of hypocrite because violence is okay but sex (even the non-explicit kind that is seen in Hollywood movies) isn’t. But having said that, I’m sure there’s no more hypocrisy involved than whatever it takes to sell tickets and make the best use of his retail space.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![A.R.Cane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ee7513/32.png) [@A.R.Cane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/A.R.Cane)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/26 "2006-01-10T13:05:44Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> “Pay” what? As I understand it (from a piece on _All Things Considered_ a while back), the core of the distributor-exhibitor agreement is that the distributor gets most of the box office receipts. (That’s why the popcorn and soda cost so much – it’s the only way for the theater to make any money. From the owner’s POV, the theater is a concession stand with screening-rooms incidentally attached.) So if the movie is not shown at all . . .

In that case the theatre owner is even more of a hypocrite, making some kind of  
moral statement, but expecting someone else to suffer the economic loss of the  
decision.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheesesteak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cheesesteak/32/3694_2.png) [@Cheesesteak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheesesteak)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 1:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/27 "2006-01-10T13:13:57Z")

</div>

> [@alaricthegoth](#):
>
> as someone else noted above, there is a fairly straightforward measure of damages available, viz. the gate in the geographically proximate theatres that  
> did screen, perhaps with some modifications on the upside since any lost opportunity for promotion, etc. will be carried to the theatre owner’s debit column.
> 
> What you don’t get in contract damages, however, is satisfaction–ie, there is no real slap upside the head for the asshole who makes this decision. All he pays is what the distributor has lost–nothing extra for being a shithead.

Assuming this is the way it works, the theater owner does get hit pretty hard. He pays the distributor for a film he did not show, and did not collect revenue for. The film he put on that screen instead earned him some revenue, but he pays a distributor for that too.

The distributor doesn’t get any extra money, but it’s a definite hit to the theater’s books, cost without revenue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![A.R.Cane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ee7513/32.png) [@A.R.Cane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/A.R.Cane)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 1:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/28 "2006-01-10T13:19:09Z")

</div>

> [@Cheesesteak](#):
>
> Assuming this is the way it works, the theater owner does get hit pretty hard. He pays the distributor for a film he did not show, and did not collect revenue for. The film he put on that screen instead earned him some revenue, but he pays a distributor for that too.
> 
> The distributor doesn’t get any extra money, but it’s a definite hit to the theater’s books, cost without revenue.

Plus the film gets a little “free” publicity, sounds fair to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 1:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/29 "2006-01-10T13:23:38Z")

</div>

> [@DWMarch](#):
>
> Well to be fair he would only be a hypocrite if he refuses to show Brokeback Mountain but has no objections to Hostel.
> 
> {snip}
> 
> But having said that, I’m sure there’s no more hypocrisy involved than whatever it takes to sell tickets and make the best use of his retail space.

I don’t know if he has any personal objections to either movie. Apparently, the special interest group/community group/whatever you want to call it objected to one particular movie and the owner bowed to that pressure. Businesses have been known to do that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DWMarch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dwmarch/32/1010_2.png) [@DWMarch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DWMarch)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 1:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/30 "2006-01-10T13:44:44Z")

</div>

> [@Monty](#):
>
> I don’t know if he has any personal objections to either movie. Apparently, the special interest group/community group/whatever you want to call it objected to one particular movie and the owner bowed to that pressure. Businesses have been known to do that.

Fair enough. This community interest group should be objecting to Hostel too though. Everything I’ve read about it leads me to believe it’s the last movie you’d want to show in a town of Mormons. If they’re not objecting to it, I fully agree with you- they’re the hypocrites.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 3:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/31 "2006-01-10T15:25:27Z")

</div>

> [@DWMarch](#):
>
> If they’re not objecting to it, I fully agree with you- they’re the hypocrites.

Tricky. That means that any group that chooses its battles (preferring ones that seem winnable over ones that are more difficult) is acting hypocritically. It’s possible the group _does_ object to _Hostel_. They might object to a _lot_ of movies (if they’re really radical, _all_ movies) but they chose to focus on one specific film where the chance of getting a theatre owner to comply was probably the highest.

You can call the group a lot of things, but I don’t think “hypocrite” is useful, unless you want to claim they’re privately making and exhibiting gay cowboy movies of their own.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/32 "2006-01-10T15:54:57Z")

</div>

Don’t know if this has been covered yet . . . Why did Larry Miller agree to show the film in his theater in the first place, and then change his mind? When he booked the movie, did he not know what it was about?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [January 10, 2006, 7:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072/33 "2006-01-10T19:45:03Z")

</div>

I think it may have something to do with the licensing agreement with his distributor.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/utah-theater-cancels-brokeback-mountain-reneges-licensing-agreement/339072.md?page=1)
