# Velvet Buzzsaw: When "great art" is bad art: SPOILER'S

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Tags:** arts-crafts\
**Created:** [December 29, 2020, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185 "2020-12-29T16:52:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2020, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/1 "2020-12-29T16:52:09Z")

</div>

I watched Velvet Buzzsaw last night. The central plot element is that a man living alone in an apartment dies, leaving behind a lifetme of paintings he’s never shown to anyone.\* An ambitious art gallery employee finds them, recognizes them as great art with massive commercial value, and rocks the art world with her discovery.

Everyone who sees the paintings agrees: a modern Great Master.

Yeah ok but . . . the painter who supplied the art for the movie is definitely not a modern Great Master. I mean that’s an element that would obviously be impossible for the filmmakers to fulfill, so the audience is expected to suspend disbelief and pretend, for the sake of the movie, that the art is, in fact, Great. Kind of like when a character’s differemt ages are played by different actors who look absolutely nothing alike.

Putting aside for now the near certainty that the Dease paintings in VB would, irl, more likely be seen in a coffeeshop than a major gallery, what are we others that require such a stretch of suspended disbelief?

\*Pretty clearly inspired by the story. of [Henry Darger](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Darger)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AHunter3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ahunter3/32/368_2.png) [@AHunter3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AHunter3)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2020, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/2 "2020-12-29T19:17:34Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Putting aside for now the near certainty that the Dease paintings in VB would, irl, more likely be seen in a coffeeshop than a major gallery, what are we others that require such a stretch of suspended disbelief?

😕

Dease and Dease? What is Dease?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hilarity\_N.Suze](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hilarity_n.suze/32/6223_2.png) [@Hilarity\_N.Suze](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hilarity_N.Suze)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2020, 8:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/3 "2020-12-29T20:25:46Z")

</div>

So is this like when Mrs. Maisel is supposed to be the funniest female comic ever but her routines are not actually all that funny? Although the show as a whole is funny those comic routines are kinda the weakest link IMO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2020, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/4 "2020-12-29T20:32:59Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Yeah ok but . . . the painter who supplied the art for the movie is definitely not a modern Great Master. I mean that’s an element that would obviously be impossible for the filmmakers to fulfill, so the audience is expected to suspend disbelief and pretend, for the sake of the movie, that the art is, in fact, Great.

Maybe they should have used [https://thisartworkdoesnotexist.com/](https://thisartworkdoesnotexist.com/).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2020, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/5 "2020-12-30T01:43:40Z")

</div>

Exactly! Although I found my credulity stretched beyond snapping when they expected us to believe that she _accidentally_ found herself onstage and _accidentally_ started telling jokes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2020, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/6 "2020-12-30T01:44:39Z")

</div>

It’s the name of the dead artist in VB.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2020, 9:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/7 "2020-12-30T21:29:31Z")

</div>

Tina Fey wrote in her autobiography (I think it was there) about why the sketches in 30 Rock were so universally bad. It wasn’t because TGS was supposed to be a bad show - it’s because as a former SNL writer she knew just how hard it is to write good sketches and, even then, a lot of times they still flopped. So they just leaned into it and made them purposefully terrible rather than expending tons of time and energy on them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![don\_t\_ask](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e68b1a/32.png) [@don\_t\_ask](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/don_t_ask)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2020, 11:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/8 "2020-12-30T23:47:32Z")

</div>

I always had that problem with _Seinfeld_. It was a great show but it was impossible to believe, from the “live” stand up bits, that Jerry was a comedian.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 2:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/9 "2020-12-31T02:28:41Z")

</div>

Compared the an average viewer I suspect I’ve had more art exposure than most. Not compared to many posters here but to the typical American viewer? Yeah. Took youth art classes at the Art Institute, mother was an artist, so on.

And I am pretty sure you could put some museum grade art that I have not seen before in front of me, and some stuff made by aspiring art students, and I likely not guess much better than chance which was which.

Which is not to say that there is no difference in quality. But most of us can only say that we like looking at something or not and only know that any specific work is “a masterpiece” because we’ve been told it is. Not so different for what is not.

That said better not to show the work in focus … let imagination fill in the masterpiece details.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 2:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/10 "2020-12-31T02:37:52Z")

</div>

My reaction to the art in _Velvet Buzzsaw_ was based o n udgment formed from 4 years at SAIC, and 34 years as an artist since then. That doesn’t mean I’m right, it just means my opinion on thisis an educated and thoughtfully considered one. And while you’re speaking hypothetically, I was commenting on specific paintings that I saw and thought about before making this post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 4:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/11 "2020-12-31T04:07:36Z")

</div>

Ya think maybe your fours of SAIC and decades as a professional artist give you a different view than the average viewer has by some bit?

That maybe your superior training and knowledge makes the willing suspension of disbelief something different than those who have maybe walked through a museum a few years back as their only real exposure to what is or is not great art, and left there not getting why much of was in there as great was considered such? But understanding it was despite the fact they didn’t see it as such.

Those of us with less educated opinions about art can be more easily convinced that something we go meh about is actually great art to those who know. Or at least can more easily suspend disbelief about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![glowacks](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/glowacks/32/5548_2.png) [@glowacks](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/glowacks)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 4:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/12 "2020-12-31T04:20:57Z")

</div>

Part of the problem with there being an amazing undiscovered artist is that you’d have to come up with some idea for a major new direction for art to move, but if that amazing new direction was anything a random artist for hire could come up with it at a whim for the implementation of a screenplay, it probably wouldn’t be too interesting. What’s the likelihood that someone working for a major film is going to randomly stumble upon the one big thing that’s been missing from art when asked to create such a thing specifically? Wouldn’t the artist more likely have been already trying to do so? You can’t use anything like the quality of the painting or similar to be amazed at, because people have painted photorealistic stuff now for decades, you have to use some new approach that’s quite interesting and yet no one’s ever thought of. So what ends up happening is that any sort of big idea that’s been hidden really isn’t all that interesting, or they completely ignore the issue of why the paintings are interesting and just tell you that they are for plot’s sake.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 4:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/13 "2020-12-31T04:27:02Z")

</div>

Exactly. Why I called it an obvious impossibility. Thanks for laying out the reasons.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Bravo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnny_bravo/32/493_2.png) [@Johnny\_Bravo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Bravo)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 5:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/14 "2020-12-31T05:12:54Z")

</div>

The point he’s making is that for 99% of viewers, if not more, it’s not a **stretch** to suspend disbelief for the sake of film. For the vast majority of viewers, though perhaps not 99% of them, it likely won’t require any suspension at all. Most of us are in the “but I know what I like” camp when it comes to fine art, after all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banksiaman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banksiaman/32/3334_2.png) [@Banksiaman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banksiaman)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 5:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/15 "2020-12-31T05:28:00Z")

</div>

In a similar principle, any play within a play will be dire, as was known to Shakespeare who used it to great comic effect in _Midsummer Nights Dream_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snooooopy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ee7513/32.png) [@Snooooopy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snooooopy)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 6:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/16 "2020-12-31T06:40:45Z")

</div>

I’m more likely to notice this when it comes to music. Like, you know, it’s a detective show and the client of the week is a musician. There will be a scene where the musician is either finishing up a concert or is laying down tracks in the studio, and it’s usually paint-by-numbers hackery or unlistenable trash that the characters are obliged by the script to act as though it’s amazing and brilliant stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Enjoy\_Slurm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/enjoy_slurm/32/3937_2.png) [@Enjoy\_Slurm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Enjoy_Slurm)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 7:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/17 "2020-12-31T07:42:49Z")

</div>

How would going to St. Anthony Institute of Carrots make you more of a disbeliever?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chockfullofheadygoodness/32/511_2.png) [@ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 8:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/18 "2020-12-31T08:03:36Z")

</div>

Reminds me of when I was 13 and snuck into my very first R-rated movie in a theatre. It was “10”. The first time Dudley Moore sees Bo Derek in the adjacent car, a woman in front of me said to her date “Huh? She’s not a 10!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GreenWyvern](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/greenwyvern/32/2834_2.png) [@GreenWyvern](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GreenWyvern)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 10:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/19 "2020-12-31T10:07:29Z")

</div>

> [@Banksiaman](#):
>
> any play within a play will be dire

One exception is _Tristram Shandy_ (2005).

It’s a deadpan comedy about making a film of the novel - and the film within the film is at least as entertaining as the outer film, and very true to the book.

It’s all very meta…but so was the original novel.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2020, 10:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185/20 "2020-12-31T10:40:50Z")

</div>

I knew it because my mom had also gone to the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, as did one of my kids in summer programs getting college credit during HS (and I was YAS - Youth of the Art Institute - on week ends).

Looking up the movie it sounds like suspending disbelief that something might be considered great art by those who know is the least of that movie’s problems.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/velvet-buzzsaw-when-great-art-is-bad-art-spoilers/929185.md?page=2)
