# "Victory Mosques?"

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [September 11, 2010, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454 "2010-09-11T23:53:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![willthekittensurvive](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/91b2a8/32.png) [@willthekittensurvive](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/willthekittensurvive)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2010, 12:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/21 "2010-09-12T12:07:35Z")

</div>

> [@Tamerlane](#):
>
> Since Abd ar-Rahman I was an escaping survivor of the overthrown Umayyad dynasty to the east,

Wow…you should do an ask the surviver of the Umayyad dynasty thread

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hogarth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hogarth/32/1773_2.png) [@hogarth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hogarth)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2010, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/22 "2010-09-12T13:05:43Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
>
> How about some cites as to the claim of “victory mosques”? The OP asks if this is true and nobody, including the OP can come up with a “victory mosque”, much less enough of them to establish a pattern. I believe that Mythbusters would call this myth “busted”.

What about [the mosque that was build on Lord Ram’s (supposed) birthplace?](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayodhya_Debate) That’s a fairly famous and controversial example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JRDelirious](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jrdelirious/32/9531_2.png) [@JRDelirious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JRDelirious)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2010, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/23 "2010-09-12T16:09:20Z")

</div>

I don’t know about that, **hogarth**. ISTM, in Ayodhya, (a) the mosque dated from the 16th Century, when (b) as mentioned everyone around the world (see: Mexico Cathedral vs. Aztec Great Temple) was doing this “take over the former rulers’ holy place to put up one of our own” thing, _which I consider distinct from the alleged “[site-of-a-military-]victory mosque” practice_, and © it was the modern-day Hindus who last decided to engage in that behavior after 400 years of holding a grudge.  
IMO, a true NY “Victory Mosque” would be converting the NY Stock Exchange and St. Patrick’s to masjid use. Or building a spectacular grand mosque in the middle of Central Park. Not a mid-sized activity center in a downtown side street.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grimpixie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/ecb155/32.png) [@grimpixie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/grimpixie)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2010, 5:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/24 "2010-09-12T17:08:13Z")

</div>

> [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](#):
>
> > [@rowrrbazzle](#):
> >
> > Naming this new center the “Cordoba Center” is highly significant. That is what makes this a big deal.
> 
> _What_ is being called the “Cordoba Center?”

The Islamic Center planned to be built two blocks away from Ground Zero in New York was originally going to be called the Cordoba Center - this building is also sometimes referred to by its opponents as the “victory mosque”. The center is now going to be called “Park51”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2010, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/25 "2010-09-12T17:10:54Z")

</div>

> [@hogarth](#):
>
> > [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
> >
> > How about some cites as to the claim of “victory mosques”? The OP asks if this is true and nobody, including the OP can come up with a “victory mosque”, much less enough of them to establish a pattern. I believe that Mythbusters would call this myth “busted”.
> 
> What about [the mosque that was build on Lord Ram’s (supposed) birthplace?](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayodhya_Debate) That’s a fairly famous and controversial example.

And the article linked to indicates that it is disputed as to whether it is on the site of an old temple at all, and in any event this was over 500 years ago back when every religion would have felt just fine converting another religion’s sacred high place to their own use. I’m utterly unconvinced that this is anything other than a slander against modern Islam.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2010, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/26 "2010-09-12T17:16:37Z")

</div>

> [@willthekittensurvive](#):
>
> > [@Tamerlane](#):
> >
> > Since Abd ar-Rahman I was an escaping survivor of the overthrown Umayyad dynasty to the east,
> 
> Wow…you should do an ask the surviver of the Umayyad dynasty thread

I’m not _that_ old :D.

[Abd ar-Rahman I](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abd_ar-Rahman_I). It’s actually a pretty remarkable and rather Hollywood-friendly story ( granted I wouldn’t doubt it has been spiced up some by hagiographers ). About as classic as you can get, really - the script practically writes itself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2010, 6:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/27 "2010-09-12T18:21:00Z")

</div>

Personally, I suspect that the “respect” afforded to the Parthenon mostly amounted to respect for how sturdily it was built, that folks couldn’t figure out how to steal it or its building materials.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![digs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/digs/32/14889_2.png) [@digs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/digs)\
**Post date:** [September 12, 2010, 7:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/28 "2010-09-12T19:43:33Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
>
> How about some cites as to the claim of “victory mosques”? The OP asks if this is true and nobody, including the OP can come up with a “victory mosque”, much less enough of them to establish a pattern. I believe that Mythbusters would call this myth “busted”…

I assumed when I read the phrase “Victory Mosques” that it was a conservative fabrication. Then I applied the infallible test: _“Would my mother and her rabidly right-wing ‘Anti-Truthers’ forward me numerous emails claiming this as a fact with no credible citations?”_

Yep. I just hope that the label hasn’t entered the language like “Death Panels”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capitaine\_Zombie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e95f7d/32.png) [@Capitaine\_Zombie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Capitaine_Zombie)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 9:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/29 "2010-09-13T09:13:13Z")

</div>

> [@rowrrbazzle](#):
>
> The Great Mosque of Cordoba was built on the site of the former Cathedral of Cordoba. After the Reconquista, it was converted back to a Cathedral.
> 
> “The mosque is regarded as perhaps the most accomplished monument of the Umayyad Caliphate of Córdoba.” [Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Mosque_of_C%C3%B3rdoba)
> 
> I’ve heard another account of this (sorry, no cite). The Muslim conquerors destroyed all the churches in the city except the cathedral, promising they would let it stand. At a later date they changed their minds and decided they needed a new mosque.
> 
> Naming this new center the “Cordoba Center” is highly significant. That is what makes this a big deal.

1)Pure BS, the Cordoba Mosque was built on the site of a former Visigoth Church, there wasnt any cathedral there.  
On the other hand, the actual Cordoba Cathedral was established by modifying the Cordoba Mosque. Charles V complained about Christians tampering with the design of the mosque and destroying its unique architecture.

It would be good to overcome natural lazyness and self righteousness before posting, and do at least some minimal fact checking.  
I always consider it makes for better conversations.

1. “I’ve heard another account of this (sorry, no cite). The Muslim conquerors destroyed all the churches in the city except the cathedral, promising they would let it stand. At a later date they changed their minds and decided they needed a new mosque”

The cite you’re looking for here is the “Great Book of things I pull out of my ass because it supports my natural bigotry, 2Ed”.

3)Yeah, Cordoba is definitely an offensive term, seeing as it’s considered by Muslims to be a high point in Muslim and Arab history for its cultural and religious tolerance (historians would have a more realistic vision of it being very tolerant, for its time). Darn Muslims, insulting us with propositions of religious tolerance and inter religions dialogue…  
Lastly, it was actually forbidden to the Muslim conquerors to destroy or take over any religious buildings belonging to Dhimmis (Jerusalem being a good example, where they made a point of not tampering with the Holy Sepulchre Church, and contrary to what has been written in this thread, the Dome Mosque wasnt built on the Jerusalem Temple, but on its ruins.There wasnt any Jerusalem Temple at that time, and there hadnt been one for centuries)  
Not that that rule was always followed but it’s not part of Muslim teachings to do so. Just like it’s not part of Christian teachings to massacre everyone in a city you conquer, yet that’s what the Crusaders did when they took Jerusalem…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 9:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/30 "2010-09-13T09:55:03Z")

</div>

> [@Capitaine\_Zombie](#):
>
> Lastly, it was actually forbidden to the Muslim conquerors to destroy or take over any religious buildings belonging to Dhimmis (Jerusalem being a good example, where they made a point of not tampering with the Holy Sepulchre Church, and contrary to what has been written in this thread, the Dome Mosque wasnt built on the Jerusalem Temple, but on its ruins.There wasnt any Jerusalem Temple at that time, and there hadnt been one for centuries)

That’s not entirely true - the Romans had built a temple to Jupiter there in 130 AD, which was replaced by a church two centuries later. However, the church had been destroyed by the (non-Muslim) Persions a few decades before the Arab conquest, and by the time a mosque was built there, the location was largely abandoned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paul_in_Qatar)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 10:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/31 "2010-09-13T10:01:46Z")

</div>

> [@grimpixie](#):
>
> > [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](#):
> >
> > _What_ is being called the “Cordoba Center?”
> 
> The Islamic Center planned to be built two blocks away from Ground Zero in New York was originally going to be called the Cordoba Center - this building is also sometimes referred to by its opponents as the “victory mosque”. The center is now going to be called “Park51”.

So since the name is highly important, and the name is inoffensive, the problem is solved? Great.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 10:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/32 "2010-09-13T10:25:44Z")

</div>

> [@Capitaine\_Zombie](#):
>
> > [@rowrrbazzle](#):
> >
> > The Great Mosque of Cordoba was built on the site of the former Cathedral of Cordoba. After the Reconquista, it was converted back to a Cathedral.
> 
> 1)Pure BS, the Cordoba Mosque was built on the site of a former Visigoth Church, there wasnt any cathedral there.  
> On the other hand, the actual Cordoba Cathedral was established by modifying the Cordoba Mosque. Charles V complained about Christians tampering with the design of the mosque and destroying its unique architecture…

The Visigoth Church _could_ have been a Cathedral, but it wasn’t. It was built on the site of a former Roman temple, too. That particular spot appears to have been “holy ground” since the area was settled; according to the information at the spot where they found Roman ruins during the last round of repairs, there were attempts to excavate further looking for more (pre?)Roman ruins but in the end it was considered that getting the Cathedral back up and running was more important than figuring out how long has the area been settled.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CurtC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ce73a5/32.png) [@CurtC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CurtC)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/33 "2010-09-13T15:00:02Z")

</div>

> [@rowrrbazzle](#):
>
> Naming this new center the “Cordoba Center” is highly significant. That is what makes this a big deal.

I thought they picked that name because it featured soft Corinthian leather.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shot\_From\_Guns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ccd318/32.png) [@Shot\_From\_Guns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shot_From_Guns)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 3:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/34 "2010-09-13T15:23:22Z")

</div>

> [@rowrrbazzle](#):
>
> Naming this new center the “Cordoba Center” is highly significant. That is what makes this a big deal.

1.) It’s not a mosque. There’s a worship space, but it also contains such horrifying terrorist training grounds as a basketball court and culinary school.

2.) It’s not at Ground Zero. It’s two blocks away from one corner of the Ground Zero area; it would be more accurately described as something like five or six blocks away.

3.) There is no line of sight between the proposed area and all of Ground Zero.

4.) The name Cordoba Center was chosen as a nod to a time of peaceful coexistence.

5.) As soon as the developers were made aware of the potential negative connotations, they announced that they would change the name to Park 51.

Most of this post was unashamedly ripped off from something by Keith Olbermann.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ccd318/32.png) [@Paul\_in\_Qatar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paul_in_Qatar)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/35 "2010-09-13T15:28:56Z")

</div>

Further, the group has no money, no engineering firm, all they got is zoning approval. This whole thing might never happen. If it does happen, it will be years down the road.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elbows](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b3f665/32.png) [@elbows](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elbows)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 3:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/36 "2010-09-13T15:36:39Z")

</div>

Ever been to Cuzco, Peru? The Spaniards razed the Inca temple to erect their cathedral. Problem was, it was so well constructed they gave up before tearing out the foundation, choosing to just build on top of it instead. You can, today, go into the cathedral and see the Inca stonework foundation.

Or is that somehow different because they don’t refer to it as the ‘Victory’ cathedral?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 3:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/37 "2010-09-13T15:45:44Z")

</div>

> [@elbows](#):
>
> Ever been to Cuzco, Peru? The Spaniards razed the Inca temple to erect their cathedral. Problem was, it was so well constructed they gave up before tearing out the foundation, choosing to just build on top of it instead. You can, today, go into the cathedral and see the Inca stonework foundation.
> 
> Or is that somehow different because they don’t refer to it as the ‘Victory’ cathedral?

Completely irrelevant to the question being asked by the OP.

Did you really not know that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shot\_From\_Guns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ccd318/32.png) [@Shot\_From\_Guns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shot_From_Guns)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 3:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/38 "2010-09-13T15:49:28Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Completely irrelevant to the question being asked by the OP.

To the question, perhaps, but not to its context. Asking whether or not Muslims have historically engaged in a certain behavior, while ignoring whether other groups have done the same, can be suspect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 3:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/39 "2010-09-13T15:59:00Z")

</div>

> [@Shot\_From\_Guns](#):
>
> > [@John\_Mace](#):
> >
> > Completely irrelevant to the question being asked by the OP.
> 
> To the question, perhaps, but not to its context. Asking whether or not Muslims have historically engaged in a certain behavior, while ignoring whether other groups have done the same, can be suspect.

Suspect of what? I didn’t realize that posting a question in GQ was subject to requirements of ideological purity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shot\_From\_Guns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ccd318/32.png) [@Shot\_From\_Guns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shot_From_Guns)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2010, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454/40 "2010-09-13T16:18:23Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Suspect of what? I didn’t realize that posting a question in GQ was subject to requirements of ideological purity.

So if someone posts in GQ asking whether or not Black people like fried chicken and watermelon, we’re not allowed to discuss whether or not people who aren’t Black also like these things?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/victory-mosques/553454.md?page=3)
