# Violent Crime in the UK

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426>\
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\
**Created:** [September 27, 2006, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426 "2006-09-27T23:05:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ardent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3be4f8/32.png) [@Ardent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ardent)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2006, 11:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426/1 "2006-09-27T23:05:19Z")

</div>

The murder rate for England and Wales is showing its first sustained fall  
since the 1960s, according to the annual crime figures published today. A  
total of 765 people were killed, including the 52 victims of the July 7 bombings in the 12 months to April 2006.

This is the third successive year that homicides in England and Wales fell  
and are down from a peak of 1,047 in 2002 which included the murders committed by Harold Shipman.

One of the most dramatic falls in the last 12 months is in the number of  
fatal shootings which have fallen from 77 to 46 largely as a result of targeted police operations.

[Murder rate declines but Home Office battles against belief that things are getting worse | Politics | The Guardian](http://society.guardian.co.uk/crimeandpunishment/story/0,,1824693,00.h) tml

* * *

I presume the column you’re referencing is: [Have Great Britain’s restrictive gun laws contributed to the rise in violent crime?](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/041105.html) – CKDH

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ardent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3be4f8/32.png) [@Ardent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ardent)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2006, 11:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426/2 "2006-09-27T23:14:51Z")

</div>

There are major problems with respect to  
the United Nations International Crime and  
Victimisation Study.

The smaller a study the less reliable it is, and  
the less people who participate the less reliable  
it is. Surveys over the telephone have major  
methodological problems.

The BCS, SCS and NICS are not a reliable  
measure of crime according to their authors,  
they merely offer an insight in to some  
peoples experience. The ICVS with a  
tiny survey group, patchy coverage and  
low participation is no where near as  
reliable or indeed comprehensive as the  
‘unreliable’ national surveys.  
Hospital Violent Crime Data

The BCS is at least backed up by Professor  
J.P Shepherd and his team at Cardiff Medical  
School who use hospital emergency and  
other data from across england and wales  
regarding the treatment of violent injuries in  
order to paint a more accurate picture.  
The Violence and Society Research Group at  
Cardiff Med School offers an analysis beyond  
that of mere questionaires, although there  
research does back up the figures presented  
by the British Crime Survey.

Violence Research Group, University of Wales  
College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff

This research note draws attention to an alternative  
source of data on violence in England and Wales  
obtained from A&E departments. The data is  
monthly frequency, classified by gender and age.

“The advantage of A&E data is that case identification  
depends not on the perception that a crime has been  
committed, but on the presence of injury deemed to  
require medical treatment. We examine the incidence  
of violent injury by gender and health region and find  
that the statistics are consistent with BCS estimates  
of overall violence”

> **[Violence‐related Injury Data in England and Wales. An Alternative Data Source...](https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article-abstract/43/1/223/485870)**
>
> Abstract. This research note draws attention to an alternative source of data on violence in England and Wales obtained from A&E departments. The data is mo

> **[BBC NEWS | UK | Wales | Violent crimes see 'sharp drop'](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/4480525.stm)**
>
> A Cardiff University study of casualty units finds that violent crime has fallen over the past five years.

The report also said that police statistics over the  
last 10 years have given an unreliable picture of  
violence because they list reported crime, rather  
than what is subsequently confirmed as a crime.

It stated: “Thus, far from representing a cause of  
concern, increases in violence recorded by police  
often signal decreases in serious violence.”

The report concluded there were “significant overall  
decreases” in serious violence across all age groups  
and genders.

The Scottish Crime Survey.  
The Scottish Crime Survey (SCS), a large scale  
household survey of public experiences and  
perceptions of crime, involving interviews with  
a sample of 5,041 adults (aged 16 or over)  
throughout Scotland. As with all previous sweeps  
of the SCS, the 2003 SCS relates to crimes that  
took place during the previous calendar year;  
that is, between January and December 2002.

[http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/12/20379/48079](http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/12/20379/48079)

The SCS is quite a good survey as it has a reasonable  
sample of over 5,000 for a country of 5 million, thats  
1000 per million, if the ICVS were to sample a similar  
percentage of population in the US they would need  
to interview 300,000 people and not less than 2000 of  
which only 40% actually participated.

The ICVS used a survey group of 37,000 for 22 Countries  
with over a billion in population and there was even low  
participation among the 37,000. To be as accurate as the  
SCS or indeed the BCS they would have to have interviewed  
face to face over 1 million people.

The criticisms of the SCS are similar to the criticisms  
relavent to all crime surveys however the SCS has  
a large survey group which makes it more accurate  
and uses face to face interviews which also increases  
accuracy.

There are some limitations to victimisation surveys,  
and the SCS is no exception. The SCS does not  
provide a complete picture of crime in Scotland.  
It is a survey of adults living in private households  
and does not, therefore, provide information on  
crimes against people not living in private households  
(for example those in hospital, prison or homeless);  
those under the age of 16; and crimes against  
corporate bodies (for example shoplifting).

Another limitation of the SCS is that it is not a  
perfectly reliable measure of crime. The survey  
is only representative of the experience of the  
people who agree to take part; the fewer people  
who participate, the less likely it is that the  
survey reflects the experiences of the people  
of Scotland as a whole. There might also be  
errors in the recall of participants. It is also  
possible that public perceptions of crime and  
victimisation may change over time, and result  
in changes in how people report crime from  
survey to survey. An example may be increased  
reporting of domestic violence, although in the  
ICVS this could be further intensified by cultural  
differences.

[http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/12/20379/48079](http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/12/20379/48079)

The ICVS interviews 2,000 people in America,  
only 40% decided to participate in the surve.

The British Crime Survey (BCS) has moved to an  
annual cycle from 2001/02, with over 50,000  
face to face interviews of people aged 16 or  
over in England and Wales

[http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/bcs1.html](http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/bcs1.html)

Northern Ireland Crime Survey (NICS)

> **[Home
      - Office for National Statistics](https://www.ons.gov.uk/)**
>
> The UK's largest independent producer of official statistics and the recognised national statistical institute of the UK.

Based on findings from the 2003/04 Northern  
Ireland Crime Survey (NICS), a personal  
interview survey of the experiences and  
perceptions of crime of 3,104 adults living  
in private households throughout Northern  
Ireland that closely mirrors the core format  
and questions of the British Crime Survey (BCS).

The population of Northern Ireland is 1.7 million  
and there are 3,104 adult surveyed more than  
the ICVS uses for the whole of the United States  
of America with a population of 300 million  
and there is a far higher participation in the NICS  
than is evident in the ICVS. Indeed America has  
one of the lowest levels of participation in the ICVS.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ardent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3be4f8/32.png) [@Ardent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ardent)\
**Post date:** [September 27, 2006, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426/3 "2006-09-27T23:13:58Z")

</div>

There are major problems with respect to  
the United Nations International Crime and  
Victimisation Study.

The smaller a study the less reliable it is, and  
the less people who participate the less reliable  
it is. Surveys over the telephone have major  
methodological problems see the study above.

The BCS, SCS and NICS are not a reliable  
measure of crime according to their authors,  
they merely offer an insight in to some  
peoples experience. The ICVS with a  
tiny survey group, patchy coverage and  
low participation is no where near as  
reliable or indeed comprehensive as the  
‘unreliable’ national surveys.  
Hospital Violent Crime Data

The BCS is at least backed up by Professor  
J.P Shepherd and his team at Cardiff Medical  
School who use hospital emergency and  
other data from across england and wales  
regarding the treatment of violent injuries in  
order to paint a more accurate picture.  
The Violence and Society Research Group at  
Cardiff Med School offers an analysis beyond  
that of mere questionaires, although there  
research does back up the figures presented  
by the British Crime Survey.

Violence Research Group, University of Wales  
College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff

This research note draws attention to an alternative  
source of data on violence in England and Wales  
obtained from A&E departments. The data is  
monthly frequency, classified by gender and age.

“The advantage of A&E data is that case identification  
depends not on the perception that a crime has been  
committed, but on the presence of injury deemed to  
require medical treatment. We examine the incidence  
of violent injury by gender and health region and find  
that the statistics are consistent with BCS estimates  
of overall violence”

> **[Violence‐related Injury Data in England and Wales. An Alternative Data Source...](https://academic.oup.com/bjc/article-abstract/43/1/223/485870)**
>
> Abstract. This research note draws attention to an alternative source of data on violence in England and Wales obtained from A&E departments. The data is mo

> **[BBC NEWS | UK | Wales | Violent crimes see 'sharp drop'](http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/4480525.stm)**
>
> A Cardiff University study of casualty units finds that violent crime has fallen over the past five years.

The report also said that police statistics over the  
last 10 years have given an unreliable picture of  
violence because they list reported crime, rather  
than what is subsequently confirmed as a crime.

It stated: “Thus, far from representing a cause of  
concern, increases in violence recorded by police  
often signal decreases in serious violence.”

The report concluded there were “significant overall  
decreases” in serious violence across all age groups  
and genders.

The Scottish Crime Survey.  
The Scottish Crime Survey (SCS), a large scale  
household survey of public experiences and  
perceptions of crime, involving interviews with  
a sample of 5,041 adults (aged 16 or over)  
throughout Scotland. As with all previous sweeps  
of the SCS, the 2003 SCS relates to crimes that  
took place during the previous calendar year;  
that is, between January and December 2002.

[http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/12/20379/48079](http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/12/20379/48079)

The SCS is quite a good survey as it has a reasonable  
sample of over 5,000 for a country of 5 million, thats  
1000 per million, if the ICVS were to sample a similar  
percentage of population in the US they would need  
to interview 300,000 people and not less than 2000 of  
which only 40% actually participated.

The ICVS used a survey group of 37,000 for 22 Countries  
with over a billion in population and there was even low  
participation among the 37,000. To be as accurate as the  
SCS or indeed the BCS they would have to have interviewed  
face to face over 1 million people.

The criticisms of the SCS are similar to the criticisms  
relavent to all crime surveys however the SCS has  
a large survey group which makes it more accurate  
and uses face to face interviews which also increases  
accuracy.

There are some limitations to victimisation surveys,  
and the SCS is no exception. The SCS does not  
provide a complete picture of crime in Scotland.  
It is a survey of adults living in private households  
and does not, therefore, provide information on  
crimes against people not living in private households  
(for example those in hospital, prison or homeless);  
those under the age of 16; and crimes against  
corporate bodies (for example shoplifting).

Another limitation of the SCS is that it is not a  
perfectly reliable measure of crime. The survey  
is only representative of the experience of the  
people who agree to take part; the fewer people  
who participate, the less likely it is that the  
survey reflects the experiences of the people  
of Scotland as a whole. There might also be  
errors in the recall of participants. It is also  
possible that public perceptions of crime and  
victimisation may change over time, and result  
in changes in how people report crime from  
survey to survey. An example may be increased  
reporting of domestic violence, although in the  
ICVS this could be further intensified by cultural  
differences.

[http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/12/20379/48079](http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/12/20379/48079)

The ICVS interviews 2,000 people in America,  
only 40% decided to participate in the surve.

The British Crime Survey (BCS) has moved to an  
annual cycle from 2001/02, with over 50,000  
face to face interviews of people aged 16 or  
over in England and Wales

[http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/bcs1.html](http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/bcs1.html)

Northern Ireland Crime Survey (NICS)

> **[Home
      - Office for National Statistics](https://www.ons.gov.uk/)**
>
> The UK's largest independent producer of official statistics and the recognised national statistical institute of the UK.

Based on findings from the 2003/04 Northern  
Ireland Crime Survey (NICS), a personal  
interview survey of the experiences and  
perceptions of crime of 3,104 adults living  
in private households throughout Northern  
Ireland that closely mirrors the core format  
and questions of the British Crime Survey (BCS).

The population of Northern Ireland is 1.7 million  
and there are 3,104 adult surveyed more than  
the ICVS uses for the whole of the United States  
of America with a population of 300 million  
and there is a far higher participation in the NICS  
than is evident in the ICVS. Indeed America has  
one of the lowest levels of participation in the ICVS.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ardent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3be4f8/32.png) [@Ardent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ardent)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2006, 8:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426/4 "2006-09-28T08:51:39Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I presume the column you’re referencing is: Have Great Britain’s restrictive gun laws contributed to the rise in violent crime? – CKDH

Yes that is the column.

Did you realise that over half of all recorded violent crime  
in the UK results in no onjury to anyone whatsoever.

That the British Crime Survey has shown a 44% drop in  
violent crime in the last ten years and this is backed up  
by ER Data.

That the what Americans call violent crime in their police  
recorded crime figures and what the British do is massively  
different. The British figure is mainly made up of simple assaults,  
assaults with no injury such as verbal assaults and crimes  
the US police would not record as a felony. In 1998 with the  
change in police recordings an even greater percentage of  
minor crimes were recorded as violent offences.

The number of serious violent offences in England and Wales  
is around 21,000 and is falling.

That in order to claim compensation from the Criminal  
Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) a violent crime  
must be recorded by the police and compensation ranges  
from £1000 ($2000) for more minor injures and mental  
trauma up to £250,000 ($500,000) for serious injuries.

Likewise insurance companies need a police crime number  
before they will pay out on a burgulary, mugging or motor  
vehicle theft.

That the history of violent crime is linked more to  
alcohol consumption than gun ownership and a  
recent study by Cardiff Medical School’s Violent  
Research Group ‘The Price of Beer and Violence  
in England’ concluded that for every 1% rise  
in alcohol prices violent crime fell massively  
and that where ever alcohol was cheapest  
in the UK more violence occurred.

Finally what constitutes violence has also  
changed with one in four violent crimes  
and the largest rise in violent crime figures  
being in Domestic Violence Cases. Whilst  
violence generally is now tolerated less  
in society and is generally reported and  
detected via the large amaont of CCTV  
cameras in British Towns and Cities.

The UK has more CCTV cameras than anywhere  
else in the world and a recent study showed  
that the detection of violent crime by police  
increased 11% in areas with CCTV cameras.

Crime in the UK has not risen massively,  
in fact hospital data and large crime  
surveys show it falling, whilst police figures  
have shown a fall in more serious violent crime  
but due to changes in police figures more  
trivial offences are recorded.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tapioca\_Dextrin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tapioca_Dextrin)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2006, 12:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426/5 "2006-09-28T12:14:13Z")

</div>

Welcome the boards **Ardent**.  
We had an [earlier discussion](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=284964) on this thread. The general concensus was it was one of Cecil’s worst ever article, littered with inummerable errors. Glad to see you’ve found some new ones.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ardent](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3be4f8/32.png) [@Ardent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ardent)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2006, 1:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426/6 "2006-09-28T13:07:53Z")

</div>

Thanks 🙂 - it’s not that I feel that strongly about  
guns. It’s the fact that the UN ICVS survey is  
a very poor piece of work. :dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2006, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426/7 "2006-09-28T22:45:08Z")

</div>

By the way, you don’t have to put line breaks in yourself. It’ll wrap automatically, and it’s a bit easier to read when it takes up more than the left 20% of the screen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2006, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/violent-crime-in-the-uk/374426/8 "2006-09-29T23:19:17Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Chronos]  
By the way, you don’t have to put line breaks in yourself.  
[/QUOTE]

Yes, you do [sub]if the police are watching…[/sub]
