# Virginia gov. yearbook page has Klan and blackface pictures

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [February 1, 2019, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809 "2019-02-01T22:05:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2019, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/381 "2019-02-05T21:57:03Z")

</div>

> [@ElvisL1ves](#):
>
> 'Tis so. Especially considering that Michael was _white_.

[Wait, wha…?](https://me.me/i/u-michael-jackson-1972-6039923)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2019, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/382 "2019-02-05T23:25:19Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> It means he was admitting he dressed as Jackson, but denies being in blackface or in the KKK costume in the other photo.

I’m honestly curious – why are you willing to accept his denial in the Saturday press conference, while discounting his Friday statement, in which he explicitly took responsibility for the picture, and his appearance in it?

On Saturday, he said, “that’s not me there.” If so, why the hell did he say it _was_ him on Friday? If he had doubts that it was him (such as if it was placed by people on the yearbook staff as a joke), I have to believe that it was something he’d known since the yearbook had come out.

If he hadn’t actually yet looked at the picture, and the article, on Friday, why would he have released a statement that clearly said: “a photograph of me” and “the decision I made to appear as I did in this photo”?

Either additional information came to light overnight on Friday night (information which hasn’t been released publicly) which indicated that the picture wasn’t of him, or he decided to switch from an admission to a denial when he realized that it’s nearly impossible to tell if he’s actually in that picture. Either way, he has wound up making two utterly contradictory public statements, with no real explanation as to why.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2019, 11:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/383 "2019-02-05T23:36:47Z")

</div>

> [@Ashtura](#):
>
> Not really, no. The fact is Tropic Thunder got laughs (an money) off black face. Don’t forget this is the movie that brought us the gem “Never go full retard”, so I don’t view this as a move whose primary purpose was to forward ploitically correct enlightened thinking. I really don’t think the POINT of the blackface in that movie was to enlighten people about how blackface is bad. The point of it was for edgy, low-brow humor. And I think the point of the blackface in that yearbook was for low-brow humor as well. Do we really think whoever was in that picture was in blackface the next day too? I mean, maybe, if the dancing contest was the next day.
> 
> There’s another thread around here who’s basic consensus is there’s basiscally no legitimate excuse for a white person to paint their skin brown. I don’t see how that movie is an exception.

The punchline in Tropic Thunder is, the white guy in blackface gets smacked upside the head by an African-American and — instead of defending himself — apologizes to the man who understandably just hit him in the face. Said white guy then asks if things are _now_ cool between them; he gets told that, well, no, they’re still not.

So the question is, _can you wear blackface if you’re explaining that it’s okay to hit a guy in the face for doing that, where one such hit isn’t enough?_ And I’m not sure what the answer is, but Downey’s career suggests that it’s a “maybe”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [February 5, 2019, 11:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/384 "2019-02-05T23:54:33Z")

</div>

Plus, if it wasn’t him in the picture, what the heck was it doing on his yearbook page?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bone/32/407_2.png) [@Bone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bone)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/385 "2019-02-06T00:02:12Z")

</div>

> [@Bone](#):
>
> Hate speech or trolling…it took me a a few moments to decide. This is a warning for trolling. If this is what you have left to offer, your stay will be short.
> 
> [/moderating]

I’ve thought about it. I’ll rescind the warning, though somewhat reluctantly. I have my doubts, but given the comments [in the ATMB thread](https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=870164) and ashai’s posting there, I’ll choose to construe the comment in a more favorable light. Please be more judicious in the future to avoid potential misunderstanding.

[/moderating]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/386 "2019-02-06T00:34:32Z")

</div>

> [@kenobi\_65](#):
>
> I’m honestly curious – why are you willing to accept his denial in the Saturday press conference, while discounting his Friday statement, in which he explicitly took responsibility for the picture, and his appearance in it?
> 
> On Saturday, he said, “that’s not me there.” If so, why the hell did he say it _was_ him on Friday? If he had doubts that it was him (such as if it was placed by people on the yearbook staff as a joke), I have to believe that it was something he’d known since the yearbook had come out.
> 
> If he hadn’t actually yet looked at the picture, and the article, on Friday, why would he have released a statement that clearly said: “a photograph of me” and “the decision I made to appear as I did in this photo”?
> 
> Either additional information came to light overnight on Friday night (information which hasn’t been released publicly) which indicated that the picture wasn’t of him, or he decided to switch from an admission to a denial when he realized that it’s nearly impossible to tell if he’s actually in that picture. Either way, he has wound up making two utterly contradictory public statements, with no real explanation as to why.

He didnt quite say that. He said “this photo”. Later it appears he was talking about a different photo, with him as Jackson.

Yes, it is confusing and I am not sure at all who is in those pics or why he said what he said, nor am I in any way saying he isnt in that picture.

What I am asking is- if he is NOT in that picture, why should he resign? Answer that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/387 "2019-02-06T00:44:11Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> …But in the first he made unclear statements over what picture he was talking about. In the later statement, he was clear.

The scan of his yearbook that we have all seen was all over the press when he made his first statement. Please parse for me your persistent claim that something was “unclear” about which picture he was talking about here:

> [@](#):
>
> Earlier today, **a website published a photograph of me from my 1984 medical school yearbook in a costume that is clearly racist and offensive**.
> 
> I am deeply sorry for the decision I made to appear as I did in this photo and for the hurt that decision caused then and now.

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> So, if he is not in those pictures, you want him to resign anyway?

I want him first to explain why his story changed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 12:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/388 "2019-02-06T00:46:00Z")

</div>

double post

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Procrustus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/procrustus/32/2994_2.png) [@Procrustus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Procrustus)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 12:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/389 "2019-02-06T00:47:47Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> What I am asking is- if he is NOT in that picture, why should he resign? Answer that.

From what others have said, he would have been responsible for the KKK photo on his yearbook page. The KKK is not a joke. They’re a domestic terrorist (and racist) organization. That shows incredibly poor judgment, even if he was not in the photo. It’s one thing to dress up like Hitler, who was a historical figure several decades removed form 1984. The Klan, on the other hand, was still [active](https://www.houstonchronicle.com/local/gray-matters/article/Photographing-the-Klan-in-the-1980s-6395815.php#photo-8336720) and holding[rallies in the 1980s.](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6419739/Ku-Klux-Klan-a-violent-history.html)

> [@](#):
>
> A series of Klan murders in the 1960s, including the killing of the three civil rights volunteers commemorated in the film Mississippi Burning, were only cleared up over the past few years as loyalty to – and fear of - the Klan dwindled among white Southerners and all-white juries.
> 
> The violence continued into the 1980s – four elderly black women were shot but not killed in Tennessee in 1980 by Klansmen who had just taken part in an initiation rally. A year later, Michael Donald, a young black man in Mobile, Alabama, was the victim of a random lynching by two Klansmen. In 1997, one of them – Henry Hayes - became the first Klan member to be put to death for a Klan murder in the state since 1913.
> 
> However, after civil liberties organisations successfully started hitting the Klan in the wallet with multi-million dollar civil lawsuits, the movement split into myriad small groups while curtailing its criminal activities.
> 
> Today, there are estimated to be almost 180 chapters, together boasting no more than 8,000 members. Two-thirds are still in the southern states

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 12:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/390 "2019-02-06T00:59:49Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> Yes, he did. But in the first he made unclear statements over what picture he was talking about. In the later statement, he was clear.
> 
> but again-So, if he is not in those pictures, you want him to resign anyway?

I don’t live in Virginia but if I did, I would want him to resign. He submitted that picture for his page and it’s disgusting. I think I get why he thought it was funny. Two guys show up for a costume party; one in blackface and one as a klansman. This is hilarious! Let’t have them pose next to each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlackerInc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slackerinc/32/275_2.png) [@SlackerInc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlackerInc)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/391 "2019-02-06T01:07:13Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> And people forget that even in 1984 there was a lot of casual racism about that by today’s standards is horrifying (just a fun reminder that the BBC was airing [this shit](https://www.bbc.co.uk/historyofthebbc/people-nation-empire/make-yourself-at-home/minstrels)up to _ **1978** _, only six years earlier).

:eek: That totally blows my mind. Hard to comprehend, especially in its latter decade.,

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Forgiveness is irrelevant, IMO. Virginia needs a governor who can advocate with strong moral authority against white supremacism. I don’t think Northam can do that at this time, and thus he should resign.

Cosigned.

> [@Acsenray](#):
>
> Because no one has the right to serve as an elected official.

I think they do have that right, once they are elected (subject to recall or impeachment, of course). That said, I hope he declines to exercise this right, and resigns.

> [@Ashtura](#):
>
> So, I must ask, sans a profuse apology, is the entire cast and crew of 2008’s _Tropic Thunder_ disqualified for political office, or just Robert Downy Junior? They used blackface not just for laughs, but for profit. And 2008 is far beyond the “they didn’t know any better back then” excuse. In fact, I’m sure that was in there to _specifically_ to be edgy.

That’s a tough one. My instinct is to say it lands on the acceptable side of the line, in part because its patent offensiveness is lampshaded within the movie, and the idea is supposed to be that he is such an Oscar-seeker, he pushes toward playing roles it’s absurdly inappropriate for him to play. But I may be biased because I really enjoy that movie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 1:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/392 "2019-02-06T01:14:04Z")

</div>

> [@SlackerInc](#):
>
> :eek: That totally blows my mind. Hard to comprehend, especially in its latter decade.

Here’s another cracker, ran from 1972-76. Making a hilarious joke of British racism. It was a popular mainstream show, I remember watching it as a kid, and I don’t remember a hint of controversy at the time (although I might have been too young to pick up on it).

> **[Love Thy Neighbor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Thy_Neighbour)**
>
> Love Thy Neighbor or Love Thy Neighbour refers to the Biblical phrase "thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" from the Book of Leviticus 19:18 in the Hebrew Bible about the ethic of reciprocity known as the Golden Rule or the Great Commandment.
> Love Thy Neighbor or Love Thy Neighbour may also refer to:

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/B1dakp4FT0w/hqdefault.jpg "Love Thy Neighbour - Compilation from 1970's British TV Show") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1dakp4FT0w)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 1:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/393 "2019-02-06T01:18:21Z")

</div>

> [@kenobi\_65](#):
>
> …On Saturday, he said, “that’s not me there.” If so, why the hell did he say it _was_ him on Friday? …

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> He didnt quite say that. He said “this photo”. Later it appears he was talking about a different photo, with him as Jackson. …

A plausible explanation: Northam has been worrying for years that the ‘blackface impersonation of Michael Jackson’ story would get out. And when the news broke about the yearbook photo, _he assumed that the photo was of him, as Jackson, at that dance contest._

The next day he’d remembered that his Jackson costume had looked quite different from what was shown in the photo. That meant that the yearbook photo had NOT been taken at the dance contest. He didn’t remember any other instances of his dressing up in blackface. So the yearbook photo had to have been put on his page by mistake, or as a prank, with the photo being of two other people entirely.

Of course for this theory to be correct, Northam would have to have assumed----on Friday, when he was going on the theory that the photo was from the dance contest----that the dance contest in which he appeared as Michael Jackson contained another contestant who danced in a KKK costume. Which is kind of far-fetched, it would seem to me. Most people would find it to be a problem if Northam willingly posed next to a dance contestant in a KKK hood. So the ‘thought the pic was from the contest’ story doesn’t really help him.  
The problem for Northam is that any ‘explanation’ of this still shows that he comes out of a culture of racism–and just accepted it as ‘normal’, back in the day. The only way I could see him surviving is if he has proof that he protested all this casual racism back in the 1980s…and if he had such proof, he’d have produced it by now.

He has to resign. He can’t lead his state, with all this hanging over him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 1:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/394 "2019-02-06T01:28:05Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> A plausible explanation: Northam has been worrying for years that the ‘blackface impersonation of Michael Jackson’ story would get out. And when the news broke about the yearbook photo, _he assumed that the photo was of him, as Jackson, at that dance contest._

The picture was all over the press, in every version of the story. It was the entire reason for making a statement. You think it’s plausible he didn’t bother to _look_ at the story and see the yearbook page that was the entire motivation for the story, that was potentially going to end his career?

Was he drunk on methanol, recovering from a cataract operation…?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlackerInc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/slackerinc/32/275_2.png) [@SlackerInc](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlackerInc)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 1:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/395 "2019-02-06T01:37:44Z")

</div>

[quote=“Riemann, post:392, topic:828809”]

Here’s another cracker, ran from 1972-76. Making a hilarious joke of British racism. It was a popular mainstream show, I remember watching it as a kid, and I don’t remember a hint of controversy at the time (although I might have been too young to pick up on it).

> **[Love Thy Neighbor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Thy_Neighbour)**
>
> Love Thy Neighbor or Love Thy Neighbour refers to the Biblical phrase "thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" from the Book of Leviticus 19:18 in the Old Testament about the ethic of reciprocity known as the Golden Rule or the Great Commandment.
> Love Thy Neighbor or Love Thy Neighbour may also refer to:

[/QUOTE]

Isn’t that more along the lines of its contemporary “All in the Family”, which IIRC was based on a British show?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 2:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/396 "2019-02-06T02:57:10Z")

</div>

I kinda hope he rides it out. If he’s unfit for office because secretly he’s a big racist jerk, you’d think it would have been apparent at some point in his last ten years of public office.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 5:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/397 "2019-02-06T05:05:54Z")

</div>

> [@Ashtura](#):
>
> Not really, no. The fact is Tropic Thunder got laughs (an money) off black face. Don’t forget this is the movie that brought us the gem “Never go full retard”, so I don’t view this as a move whose primary purpose was to forward ploitically correct enlightened thinking. I really don’t think the POINT of the blackface in that movie was to enlighten people about how blackface is bad. The point of it was for edgy, low-brow humor. And I think the point of the blackface in that yearbook was for low-brow humor as well. Do we really think whoever was in that picture was in blackface the next day too? I mean, maybe, if the dancing contest was the next day.
> 
> There’s another thread around here who’s basic consensus is there’s basiscally no legitimate excuse for a white person to paint their skin brown. I don’t see how that movie is an exception.

But what you think isn’t what’s relevant here. You’re asking us what we believe.

You asked whether we thought these guys should be disqualified because of their roles in this film. We say no, because we believe there is a difference. The scene in question clearly has the guy in blackface not to mock African Americans, but to mock racists.

While it’s possible there is such a context to the photo, no one has alleged such. And it was put in a yearbook without including that context, so it was published without that context. So it was not an anti-racist use of blackface.

That said, it would be politically dangerous for anyone who has ever appeared in blackface to run, even if said blackface was in an anti-racist context. There are people who won’t care. And there is no chance that the other party will not use it to attack both the candidate and their party.

There are too many people out there who have never worn blackface to get all that upset about it. We’re not talking about “every single bad decision” here. There are just some things that are beyond the pale. And it’s a problem that become less of an issue as time goes on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rick\_Kitchen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rick_kitchen/32/522_2.png) [@Rick\_Kitchen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rick_Kitchen)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 5:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/398 "2019-02-06T05:44:07Z")

</div>

Northam’s medical school stopped publishing yearbooks _ **in 2013** _ because they were becoming increasingly racist.  
[https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/northam-med-school-banned-yearbooks-2013-due-to-racist-photos](https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/northam-med-school-banned-yearbooks-2013-due-to-racist-photos)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 5:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/399 "2019-02-06T05:51:16Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> He didnt quite say that. He said “this photo”. Later it appears he was talking about a different photo, with him as Jackson.
> 
> Yes, it is confusing and I am not sure at all who is in those pics or why he said what he said, nor am I in any way saying he isnt in that picture.
> 
> What I am asking is- if he is NOT in that picture, why should he resign? Answer that.

As Riemann has already noted, the full text was:

"Earlier today, a website published a photograph of me from my 1984 medical school yearbook in a costume that is clearly racist and offensive.

I am deeply sorry for the decision I made to appear as I did in this photo and for the hurt that decision caused then and now."

He explicitly referred to his yearbook page, and the photo of him in costume on that page, in that.

Unless he made that statement without actually looking at that website on Friday (or any of the many other news sites which picked up the story and re-ran the photo), then I don’t see how he could not have already known, when he made that statement on Friday, that the picture in question (which he was admitting was of him) was _not_ of him dressed up as Michael Jackson.

And, if he issued the statement _without_ looking at the picture, then he was clearly in panicky idiot mode.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [February 6, 2019, 6:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809/400 "2019-02-06T06:03:49Z")

</div>

> [@Rick\_Kitchen](#):
>
> Northam’s medical school stopped publishing yearbooks _ **in 2013** _ because they were becoming increasingly racist.  
> [Northam’s Med School Banned Yearbooks In 2013 Due To Racist Photos - TPM – Talking Points Memo](https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/northam-med-school-banned-yearbooks-2013-due-to-racist-photos)

Neither your link nor what the WaPo article it’s regurgitating say anything about “increasingly racist”. The WaPo article actually specifically mentioned that they hadn’t run a review of past issues when they shut it down.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809.md?page=19)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/virginia-gov-yearbook-page-has-klan-and-blackface-pictures/828809.md?page=21)
