When one says “white” in the context of how Jesus has been depicted, I think we mostly mean straight, light brown hair and beard with a Roman nose and round eyes. Skin color (other than dark brown or black) is pretty indistinct in a 500 year old oil painting.
I thought John the Revelator was not the ‘biblical john’ the john that was a desciple?
From the Staff Report I linked to upthread:
(bolding mine)
Again, meaningless. Since people used scribes.
Still, I do not think Revelation was “written” by John the Apostle.
style in this case refers to word usage and sentence structure, not handwriting.
You dont think that a scribe can pick the sentence structure and even suggest better words?
I’ve gone through this thread and, as far as I can seem, no one’s brought up Lentulus, so I will.Correct me if I’m wrong
The letter is one of those interesting bits of late apocrypha that seems to date friom 15th century Italy. It purports to be written by a Roman official who was a contemporary of Jesus, and gives a description:
Of course, being probably from the 1400s, this is pretty useless as real evidence. It’s thought to be influential in later depictions of Jesus, though, and Wikipedia claims it’s at least consistent with earlier works (which were still removed from Jesus’ time by centuries).
I note that the earliest depictions of Jesus we have (controversial, because it’s not even clear whether they are supposed to portray Jesus) seem to have been Roman works that portray him as a beardless Roman man. They were almost certainly not basedd on any description they might have had.
I’ll agree that Jesus probably looked like some random 1st century Middle Eastern Jew. What else would one expect? No contemporary work says otherwise or gives some odd quirk in his appearance.
Palestinian-American Rashida Tlaib asking “Do I look white to you?”
Circling “White” on the Census changed my lived experience as a person of color in our country,
Was there even someone called Jesus? Did Buddha even exist? I don’t think there is any real hard evidence one way or the other. All religions seem to have a need to rely on some sort of belief. According to the writings he was Jewish, so make of that what you will.
But sure, the people that dug up a bunch of old scrolls in the desert and magically combined them into book form used all manner of agendas to edit what they put in or left out.
He sure looked white in the paintings I saw in Catholic School in Alabama. Maybe he is depicted as Black in Africa, I don’t know. There really is no way to know for sure, but having lived in the desert of Tucson, that sure made me browner than I was before. I’m still Italian American though, no matter what color I may temporarily be.
IIRC Gautma was a prince. Thus, there is hard evidence that a man by that name exhisted.
Modnote: Buddha is off-topic. Please stay on topic especially in GD and P&E.
This is also not the thread for Debating the Existence of Jesus. Just if the Bible says what color skin he had.
As it is 16 days later, I think I’ll just leave this one closed now.