War of The Worlds (Thread contains SPOILERS!)

Yes…I too would have screamed just like Dakota Fanning.

Well you pretty much got your wish for the second part.

I thought the first half of the movie was crazy! Freakin 1920’s style Death Rays blasting people into ashes!

The movie is relatively bloodless but there are a whole lot of holy freakin shit!! moments:

-That first monsterous tripod going apeshit on Bayonne, NJ. (that’s the Bayonne Bridge, not the Pulasky Skyway. (The viaduct leading up to the main span of the PS is an all steel truss structure while the BB has I-beams supported by concrete columns.)

-The bodies all washing by in the river

-The crowd tearing apart their stolen minivan outside the diner

-The flaming train

-The flaming humvees rolling off the hill

-The ferry landing

And one thing I loved -

one of the first movies AFAIK where the hero basically was like “ok asshole, since you refuse to listen to reason and are behaving in an erradic way that will get us all killed, I’m taking you down”.

Unfortuneately, I never did care for the deux ex machina ending of any version of WotW.

Gangster Octopus - You did see that movie. It was called Independence Day.

You don’t need any evolutionary advantage to successfully invade and conquer – just better technology. If Wells’ novel is really a satirical reflection on British colonialism, remember that white Europeans were in no way physically nor mentally superior to the darker people they stole countries from.

Given that the current U.S. administration is acting as if we were an imperial power, maybe that kind of satire is relevant again.

They don’t call it The Red Planet for nothin’, ya know.

Saw it this afternoon & loved it. I pretty much agree with the other high points raised here.

One nice touch was how the aliens seemed clever (more than just technologically advanced):

The long shots of the Tripods hearding people around. Related to this, the whole ambush of the ferry. The way the Tripods just waited, causing the mob to panic and rush the ferry, allowing the machine in the river to flip it & catching the people as they flounder in the water. Much more efficient than chasing people through ruins.

As for the ending:

They should have left the son’s fate unknown - assumed dead - rather than the typical feel-good bit. Having said that, I was half-expecting to see Cruise & his wife join up at the end and have the ‘family brought back together through hardship’ cliche.

Anyone else love to see a novel set 6 months after an event like this and its effect on the world?

Don’t you get it?
Think about it.
What did she say about her hand and the splinter. That when her body was ready it would push it out.

That’s what the Earth did to the aliens. The thing about her hand is just a really short version of the film. It’s called foreshadowing. If you’d like to learn more about foreshowding, you can read about it in your local library.

I just saw it this afternoon and I hated it. Yes, the special effects were good, and Cruise did a credible job with the script he had to work with, but overall the plot was really lame.

I have to admit I haven’t read the book, or seen any of the earlier versions, and I probably won’t after seeing this thing.

Generally, the movie reminded me a lot of Independence Day, but instead of the best and the brightest trying to figure out how to take out these invaders we have the Army with a few tanks & guns and everybody else panics.

And don’t even get me started about the lame cop-out ending. You’d think that an advanced civilization that has spent thousands or millions of years plotting how to take over a planet would analyze all of the indigenous life forms, and not just the humans.

I have to agree with some of the other posters that there must be two versions of this movie, because obviously most of you did not see the same one I did.

Blame HG Wells. :rolleyes:

Saw it again, with my wife this time, this evening. Still liked it a lot.

An alien invasion is much more like a viral infection (fittingly) than it is like a splinter.

If they’d wanted foreshadowing, why not have a character suffering from a cold or flu, but then get over it at some point in the film? This would tie in much, much better with the ending of the movie than does a splinter. A splinter isn’t killed or destroyed; it’s pushed out. The aliens are not pushed out; they are destroyed. By a virus or bacteria that humans can survive because they’ve evolved to deal with it.

I’ll see if I can find any books at the local library about poorly thought out foreshadowing in films.

Ooooh, that’s evil. I like that. :smiley:

Well, I guess I’m going to have to see it again. I’ll wait for DVD though.

The only two movies I have ever fallen asleep in where this and Godzilla. I just dozed off a couple of times.

My Wife, who loves action movies, end of the world type movies, was not impressed with the movie either. She thought it was OK.

I really, really wanted to love this movie. Guess I had my hopes up too high, and was a bit tired.

Independence Day is essentially a remake of War of the Worlds. I’ve never read the book, but it follows the exact same structure as the 1950s movie. The only difference is that it’s a computer virus that takes them out.

Speilberg specifically said he was telling the story form the point of view of one guy and his family, not a bunch of ivory tower eggheads directing the action from some war room under a mountain.

When we first went to the moon, NASA was pretty worried about germs. They took precautions but you know what? There is no way they were 100% sure about those precautions. The aliens may have taken their own precautions but they weren’t enough. (plus, that’s how it works in War of the Worlds)

The movie stays pretty true to the book in spirit, and remember WOTW was written in 1898. The final denouement seems abrupt and obvious to us, but at time of writing, pathology was a very new science. The Martians in the story were dumbkopfs about disease because we were too at that time. Wells wrote that the Martians had eliminated germs and disease millenia ago (ha, ha), and neglected to take into account that Earth might have microbes that could affect them.

The 1898 writing date also is a defense againt accusations that this is a thin plot. It’s one of the very first science fiction stories ever written - of course it seems simple to us. IMO, the simplicity is a good thing. It’s not about wars and presidents and computer geeks and international politics and 'droids and dancing bar critters. It’s about pure and simple destruction and survival and the unintelligible actions of aliens. I loved it.

My favorite bit - the huge bass note that the tripods played to signal each other. Not quite like the howling or hooting in the book, but extremely impressive.

BTW, I must have missed in the movie where the tripods were shown to have shields. I thought the presence of the crows flying around the hoods indicated that there were dead aliens inside attracting scavengers, as in the book.

By the way, I don’t think that the son was just trying to see some 'sploshuns. From what I saw, he was more of a misguided (idiotic) idealist, trying to help in whatever way possible. Notice when he climbed up to where people were hanging off the side the ferry, hauling them in? 'Course, he was bound to be - should have been - killed, but I can almost sympathize.

I read Ebert’s review

I didn’t see this scene in the movie. Was it cut from the version Ebert saw?

There were a couple of scenes in the movie where you could see the shells and stuff thrown at them exploding x meters away from the tripods themselves. It was very close in effect to the way they showed the Martian shields in the 1953 movie. And I think one of the soldiers they met mentioned shields.

Having said that, I think the presence of crows=dead/dying Martians makes lots more sense.

Perhaps he was just outside the effected area when the pulse went off? The bigger question is how did those journalists video tape the lightening strikes and not have the EMP fry the camera since it had to be close to it.

The movie suffers because we all saw ID4, which is the movie that made SS not make this movie years ago. But I have to admit liked the Tim Robbins bit.

Of course, I wish it had been Tim R. who had killed Tom C. instead, because he was the one being hysterical.

I agree. How does it make sense that people are just standing around when a monstrosity comes out of the ground? I actually thought they deserved to be stomped or zapped. Ditto for the Tom Cruise character. Obviously a not-too-bright guy who only starts running when all hell breaks loose. And that daughter of his … she screamed so much that I almost wished that one of those aliens just takes her away for good! So you can see that I didn’t think all that highly of the movie. The special effects were good, but the characterizations of the characters strained credibility. And then to top it off, Robbie somehow survived the explosive mayhem in which he was smack dab in the middle of. For what purpose? Obviously to give the movie a happy family ending. The best part of the movie was the opening and closing narration by Morgan Freeman, who’s truly a class act in any movie he’s in.