# War on Christmas - revisited

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 30, 2006, 3:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205 "2006-01-30T15:11:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 34

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2006, 3:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205/666 "2006-02-15T15:14:34Z")

</div>

> [@Scott Plaid](#):
>
> Yes, you simply happen to be supporting the right of people to use a loaded term, albeit not in the way that the popular media intends it.

I pointed you to the post in which I said I did NOT support the term.

You replied:

> [@Scott Plaid](#):
>
> A hyperlink: [:rolleyes:](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=7100185&postcount=633)

That post relates to my “tone”, at least as perceived by **MaxTheVool**. What has that do with YOUR post about the use of the term “War on Christmas”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scott\_Plaid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@Scott\_Plaid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scott_Plaid)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2006, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205/667 "2006-02-15T15:16:06Z")

</div>

I don’t think I have to spell it out for you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hawthorne](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c89c15/32.png) [@hawthorne](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hawthorne)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2006, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205/668 "2006-02-15T15:19:10Z")

</div>

This issue seems to be causing a bit of confusion. **Bricker** has several times quite explicitly disavowed the term “War on Chistmas”, but given that it’s the thread title and Bricker remains one of the major actors in the thread, perhaps it would be better if this thread were shut. It’s Bricker’s thread, but perhaps he might ask for this now over-long and confusing thread to be shut and direct people to a new OP where he sets out the issue/s and what remain matters of contention, rather than the confections which seem unfortunately to distract us here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2006, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205/669 "2006-02-15T16:35:54Z")

</div>

> [@Scott Plaid](#):
>
> I don’t think I have to spell it out for you.

Then I would suggest that other participants simply ignore your content-free digs and sniping from the sidelines.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MaxTheVool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@MaxTheVool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MaxTheVool)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2006, 5:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205/670 "2006-02-15T17:43:44Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> That post relates to my “tone”, at least as perceived by **MaxTheVool**. What has that do with YOUR post about the use of the term “War on Christmas”?

Although, now that you bring it up, I _would_ appreciate a response to that post…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2006, 6:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205/671 "2006-02-15T18:37:41Z")

</div>

> [@Scott Plaid](#):
>
> I don’t think I have to spell it out for you.

You are not capable of spelling it out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2006, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205/672 "2006-02-15T18:39:02Z")

</div>

> [@hawthorne](#):
>
> This issue seems to be causing a bit of confusion. **Bricker** has several times quite explicitly disavowed the term “War on Chistmas”, but given that it’s the thread title and Bricker remains one of the major actors in the thread, perhaps it would be better if this thread were shut. It’s Bricker’s thread, but perhaps he might ask for this now over-long and confusing thread to be shut and direct people to a new OP where he sets out the issue/s and what remain matters of contention, rather than the confections which seem unfortunately to distract us here.

I certainly support that.

I’d ask that this thread be closed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MEBuckner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mebuckner/32/2896_2.png) [@MEBuckner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MEBuckner)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2006, 7:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205/673 "2006-02-15T19:24:55Z")

</div>

**Moderator’s Note:** Thread closed at the OP’s request.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/war-on-christmas-revisited/342205.md?page=33)
