# wasted water

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wasted-water/633597>\
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\
**Created:** [September 4, 2012, 12:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wasted-water/633597 "2012-09-04T00:11:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![J\_E\_Heyl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/ba9def/32.png) [@J\_E\_Heyl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/J_E_Heyl)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2012, 12:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wasted-water/633597/1 "2012-09-04T00:11:12Z")

</div>

Cecil,

I must admit I am puzzled. It seems to me your recent most informative post was the answer a question that wasn’t asked.

Arguably the Earth represents a closed system. I don’t imagine much water is being lost to space (though admittedly I haven’t researched this). Thus water is simply moved from one place to another over time. None is actually “lost”. The problem we are facing with draught, then, represents a change in the location or form of the water, not an actual decrease in the amount of water in the system (the entire planet).

Of course, this doesn’t actually help anyone who is currently feeling the effects of water shortages since relocating water is not an easy task. As you imply in your answer, the fact that ocean levels are rising doesn’t help since converting salt to fresh water is not seen as economically viable.

I certainly don’t have to tell you that the location of water has been a contentious issue for much of recorded history. Wars big and small have been fought over this. I’m just not sure how shorter showers is going to mean more water for a farmer 1,000 miles away.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kenm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/bc79bd/32.png) [@Kenm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kenm)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2012, 3:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wasted-water/633597/2 "2012-09-04T03:33:12Z")

</div>

[**The referenced column**](http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/3065/how-can-water-be-wasted-doesn-t-it-automatically-recycle).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2012, 10:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wasted-water/633597/3 "2012-09-04T10:07:34Z")

</div>

We may not lose water, but we do lose [Hydrogen](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_escape) (one of the first studies I read was about the changing composition of the atmosphere from the Palaeoproterozoic or whatever - didn’t really understand it).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b2d939/32.png) [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C_K_Dexter_Haven)\
**Post date:** [September 4, 2012, 11:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wasted-water/633597/4 "2012-09-04T11:53:45Z")

</div>

The question that was asked was whether water conservation (“not wasting water”) was a good/useful thing. Cecil’s answer was focused on the LOCAL question rather than the global question. From a local perspective, yes, not wasting water is good. From a global perspective, it perhaps doesn’t matter.

Sort of like asking, “Is it good to have airbags in the car?” The LOCAL answer is yes, it’s protection. A global (long-term, big perspective) answer would be: you’re going to be dead in 100 years anyway, so what’s the difference? I think most readers would agree that the long-term, big perspective answer is unsatisfactory. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jmrcm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7c8e57/32.png) [@jmrcm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jmrcm)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2012, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wasted-water/633597/5 "2012-09-05T20:53:25Z")

</div>

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> We may not lose water, but we do lose [Hydrogen](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_escape) (one of the first studies I read was about the changing composition of the atmosphere from the Palaeoproterozoic or whatever - didn’t really understand it).

It’s simple-ish. The atmosphere, is held around the earth by gravity. Sunlight makes gas molecules warm (or even hot), they fly very high into the atmosphere - gravity eventually slows them down, and they fall back to earth cooler.

Occasionally, the gas molecules go so fast they escape the earth’s gravity and we lose them to outer space. But it’s not much, so we don’t really notice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael63129](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/3da27b/32.png) [@Michael63129](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Michael63129)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2012, 4:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/wasted-water/633597/6 "2012-09-06T04:48:04Z")

</div>

The biggest problem with “wasting” water is that it takes energy to filter and distribute water, so “wasting” water is really more like wasting energy. Of course, there are areas where water supply is a concern, so “wasting” water in this case also means straining the available supply (thus why you get lawn watering bans and the like during droughts).

Also, desalination of salt water into fresh water [is economically viable](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desalination), and rapidly growing as a source of fresh water, although at a high energy cost (getting back to the first point I made above), mainly in Middle Eastern countries (half of Saudi Arabia’s water comes from desalination) but also islands and areas with persistent drought:

> [@](#):
>
> According to the International Desalination Association, in 2009, 14,451 desalination plants operated worldwide, producing 59.9e6 cubic metres (2.12×109 cu ft) per day, a year-on-year increase of 12.3%.[4] It was 68 million m3 in 2010, and expected to hit 120 million m3 by 2020; some 40 million m3 is planned for the Middle East.
