# Watching the Alfred E Smith Dinner

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [October 21, 2016, 1:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215 "2016-10-21T01:05:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TokyoBayer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tokyobayer/32/13989_2.png) [@TokyoBayer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TokyoBayer)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/101 "2016-10-21T16:09:01Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> It’s a shame. He started out pretty good and told some solid jokes. Bragging about his modesty is an oldie but a goodie. The “pardon me” joke was great, Clinton was howling with laughter. The joke about Melania’s speech might have been the best joke of the night.
> 
> And then he bombed.
> 
> Oh, he bombed so very hard.

I actually liked some of his jokes the best. I think it would have been better to have stopped the “pardon me” there instead of finishing it but that would take some subtlety.

Most of his “jokes” just came across as mean or not even mean and certainly not clever. The line about hating Catholics was one such “joke.”

I agree with **CairoCarol** that Hillary’s performance skated the line (and I also watched it first) but at least there was self deprecating humor in hers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/102 "2016-10-21T16:45:04Z")

</div>

Agree with TokyoBayer. Trump was already getting huge laughs with “Pardon me.” He didn’t need to explain the joke. But he can’t help stepping on his punchline; it’s what he does at rallies, trying to extend the laughter as long as possible. Every time during this one that people laughed, he continued the joke past its peak point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alan\_Smithee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/2acd7d/32.png) [@Alan\_Smithee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alan_Smithee)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/103 "2016-10-21T16:45:07Z")

</div>

Sorry to continue the hijack, but I did attend a United Methodist seminary for three years.

It’s a bit of a tricky point to summarize neatly, both because Methodism in the United States is a very broad tent, and because John Wesley, the founder of Methodism and perpetual wellspring of Methodist theology, tacked a narrow course between traditional Protestant _sola fide_ theology and Catholic faith-and-works doctrine. (It’s worth noting that Methodism arose within the Anglican church, which does the same thing.)

Methodists do believe that salvation comes only through God’s grace, but the defining feature of Methodist theology is that it is Arminian (a reference to an obscure pre-Reformation theologian) in believing that salvation involves a human response to that grace, and that that response involves both assent to belief (faith) and changes in behavior (works). Early Methodism defined itself (and was defined) in contrast with the Calvinist belief that faith itself was out of human hands: not a human response, but an irresistible gift that God predestined certain people to have and others not to.

Technically, both of these positions are consistent with Luther’s doctrine of _sola fide_ (faith alone), since works are seen not as a cause of salvation, but the inevitable outcome and sign of faith, but in practice, Arminians (which today includes in practical terms a lot of traditionally Calvinist sects; good luck finding a member–lay or clergy–of the Presbyterian Church [USA] today who really accepts Five-Point Calvinism) place a lot more emphasis on doing good works (especially as _part of_, if not the cause of, salvation) than the few remaining Calvinists (generally Southern Baptists, a subset of Evangelicals, and most fundamentalists).

As mentioned above, though, the issue is even more complicated by the status of the United Methodist Church as the tofu of American religion, which is to say, it picks up the flavor of whatever it is stewed with. In the south, this often means Southern Baptists, who, as mentioned above, are probably the greatest organized concentration of Calvinists in the country. Since the south is also a stronghold of Methodism, you might easily find a third to half the Methodist preachers in the country rejecting Clinton’s description of Methodism just like **Vicsage**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inbred\_Mm\_domesticus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/aca169/32.png) [@Inbred\_Mm\_domesticus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inbred_Mm_domesticus)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/104 "2016-10-21T16:54:25Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> Comparisons to 1980 or 1992 are laughable.
> 
> In 1980, if you wanted to see Jimmy Carter do something, it had to be on the six o’clock news.
> 
> Today, the Al Smith dinner is on the Internet. Millions of people will watch it. **What’s private or exclusive is no longer anything of the sort.** Had Trump whiffed at the dinner in 1984, few people would know. Now people find out about it in moments and can watch it in HD on their phones. It’s a different era, and you change with it or it’ll leave you behind.

If Trump weren’t already aware of how badly he was losing he would have been far more gracious. He needs to keep his base dialed in so he did the right thing for him at this event. His people, who saw this event, were probably fantastically entertained by his behavior.

I have to admit I was too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alan\_Smithee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/2acd7d/32.png) [@Alan\_Smithee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alan_Smithee)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 5:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/105 "2016-10-21T17:12:26Z")

</div>

Because I can’t help myself, I’m going to post a little more about Arminianism vs. Calvinism. What I posted earlier makes it seem like a very technical distinction, but it has practical consequences.

Presented with someone who claims to be Christian but who refuses to do anything good, an Arminian Methodist and a Calvinist Southern Baptist will have different reactions.

The Baptist will say that although the refusal to do good works _may_ be a sign that the person isn’t truly saved, it may be ignorance of what Christianity demands. Only the person’s inner acceptance of Jesus really matters. Furthermore, if the person ever truly accepted Jesus into her heart, she is saved no matter what, because no conscious or unconscious thought or action on her part can undo God’s will (and only those God desires to save will accept Jesus).

The Methodist will say that humans have a choice to accept or reject God’s grace, and that even if the person genuinely accepted Jesus at one point, the current refusal to do good works is itself a rejection of God’s grace and a denial of faith, which should be remedied through continued repentance and the practice of good works.

Both will agree that a person who converts on her deathbed and lacks the opportunity, but not the desire, to do good works is going to heaven.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Buck\_Godot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/buck_godot/32/6573_2.png) [@Buck\_Godot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Buck_Godot)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/106 "2016-10-21T17:16:25Z")

</div>

Trump’s jokes reminded me of Mallard Fillmore. In that they are basically just tired old Republican attacks, which I suppose a like minded individual might view in a “it’s funny cause it’s true” sort of way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Corry\_El](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ecae2f/32.png) [@Corry\_El](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Corry_El)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/107 "2016-10-21T17:22:37Z")

</div>

The difference between the two struck me as partly typical of the campaign. Her jokes, though generally clumsily delivered, were probably all written by the ‘witty’ section of the big professional writing team, discussed and maybe even tested with focus groups. His seemed to be a mixture of possibly some professionally written ones but others he probably made up himself and didn’t bounce off anybody else first.

For example, a candidate might given the writing team the Podesta/Palmieri (‘but we’re Catholics too and anyway we don’t remember that’ yeah sure) anti-Catholic thing and ask, ‘can you make something funny and fairly lighthearted out of this, considering it’s a Catholic sponsored gathering’?

But seemed to me some of Clinton’s were not really jokes either and more like what you’d expect at a debate (‘Donald said I was on drugs but I was just better prepared than he was’). Both of them went pretty light on _self_ deprecation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/108 "2016-10-21T17:27:35Z")

</div>

> [@skdo23](#):
>
> Last night, Trump’s coffin was nailed shut and buried six feet under, but now it appears that this wasn’t good enough and he wants his corpse to be dug up and burned, with the ashes dumped into the Mariana Trench to be consumed by bottom feeders, with the excess shitted out and devoured by the yet to be discovered microscopic organisms that exist even further down the food chain. In other words, a Democratic senate isn’t good enough for him, and he wants to give us the House as well. Thanks Drumpf!

Love it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 5:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/109 "2016-10-21T17:37:14Z")

</div>

Well, that there would be some mighty good works! OK if he goes to Heaven, I guess, I’m not likely to notice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 5:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/110 "2016-10-21T17:37:18Z")

</div>

Behind the podium, there was a guy with a knightly award, medals etc, any idea who he is?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lost4life](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c4cdca/32.png) [@lost4life](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lost4life)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 6:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/111 "2016-10-21T18:10:43Z")

</div>

I assume she had two sets of jokes. One set making fun of herself in the event Trump took the high road, and the one she used.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rushgeekgirl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rushgeekgirl/32/3715_2.png) [@Rushgeekgirl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rushgeekgirl)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/112 "2016-10-21T18:29:47Z")

</div>

> [@Vicsage](#):
>
> Going further into the Wiki link to the salvation section, it says salvation is a work of God alone with no work by which it can be earned. Don’t really want to change the topic of the thread into a religious one, just pointing out she misrepresented the Methodist beliefs. Probably not intentional, most people who go to church really don’t pay attention to the fine points of their religion.

I actually just came to this topic to see if anyone else had noticed! I was raised Methodist. When she said it I was kind of surprised because it’s not some deep secret. It’s really important, and something that is stressed a lot. None of our works is worth a damn, they’re dead without faith.

I just assume she didn’t write that part of her speech. She did joke about her speech writers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dan\_W\_Randolph](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c2a13f/32.png) [@Dan\_W\_Randolph](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dan_W_Randolph)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 6:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/113 "2016-10-21T18:41:36Z")

</div>

> [@kunilou](#):
>
> That would be [Maria Bartiromo](http://www.bartiromo.com/).

Does anyone know who the man behind Trump was that was on his right wearing the big cross? All the people sitting up there reminded me of the James Taggart types in “Atlas Shrugged”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 6:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/114 "2016-10-21T18:46:49Z")

</div>

> [@Dan\_W\_Randolph](#):
>
> Does anyone know who the man behind Trump was that was on his right wearing the big cross?

Well, if they answer my post 110, that might also answer your query. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/115 "2016-10-21T18:58:28Z")

</div>

> [@Alan\_Smithee](#):
>
> Presented with someone who claims to be Christian but who refuses to do anything good, an Arminian Methodist and a Calvinist Southern Baptist will have different reactions.
> 
> The Baptist will say that although the refusal to do good works _may_ be a sign that the person isn’t truly saved, it may be ignorance of what Christianity demands. Only the person’s inner acceptance of Jesus really matters. Furthermore, if the person ever truly accepted Jesus into her heart, she is saved no matter what, because no conscious or unconscious thought or action on her part can undo God’s will (and only those God desires to save will accept Jesus).
> 
> The Methodist will say that humans have a choice to accept or reject God’s grace, and that even if the person genuinely accepted Jesus at one point, the current refusal to do good works is itself a rejection of God’s grace and a denial of faith, which should be remedied through continued repentance and the practice of good works.

Sometimes on the Dope I can get irritated with ill-informed blowhards who are convinced they know more than they do. (And if you think that describes me, sorry). But for every one of those, there’s another poster like **Alan Smithee** , who writes detailed, cogent, informed posts that help me understand the world better. **Alan** , thanks for this wonderful series of posts–you and folks like you are why I stay around here :).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lok](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/e8c25b/32.png) [@Lok](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lok)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 7:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/116 "2016-10-21T19:38:40Z")

</div>

> [@Happy\_Lendervedder](#):
>
> Even his most self-deprecating bit was at the expense of his wife.

And I seriously doubt she said a word to him later. Trump doesn’t strike me as someone who would be contrite about using her like that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Katriona](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/katriona/32/113_2.png) [@Katriona](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Katriona)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 8:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/117 "2016-10-21T20:05:33Z")

</div>

> [@coremelt](#):
>
> Anyone want to bet that everything up to the Melania Trump joke (maybe the confession one as well) was written for him then after that he went off script and ranted his usually bile. It was such a stark contrast, jumping straight from a surprisingly self aware joke at his wife’s expense then straight into calling Clinton corrupt.
> 
> Keep at it Donald, you’re only digging your own hole deeper and deeper! Nice work!

I thought so, too - after he rifled through his notes and said how corny it all was is about when it went off the rails.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Katriona](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/katriona/32/113_2.png) [@Katriona](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Katriona)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/118 "2016-10-21T20:11:09Z")

</div>

> [@voltaire](#):
>
> They both told the same exact joke, which I’m not so sure was a coincidence. Hillary got in front of the obvious “speaking in front of a lot of rich people and not getting paid” joke by doing it herself before Trump got a chance to.
> 
> ETA: Oh wait, I watched it out of order, didn’t I? Whatever, they did the same joke, though.

I haven’t seen the email, but I saw it posted elsewhere that one of the Wikileaks emails had a string between two staffers - one of the Catholic - about how Catholics are likely to vote, demographic stuff. If that’s what he was referencing, it’s pretty weak.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mighty\_Girl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7bcc69/32.png) [@Mighty\_Girl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mighty_Girl)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 8:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/119 "2016-10-21T20:13:07Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> Sometimes on the Dope I can get irritated with ill-informed blowhards who are convinced they know more than they do. (And if you think that describes me, sorry). But for every one of those, there’s another poster like **Alan Smithee** , who writes detailed, cogent, informed posts that help me understand the world better. **Alan** , thanks for this wonderful series of posts–you and folks like you are why I stay around here :).

This.

I was raised Catholic, educated in a Catholic school, and I rarely opine on matters of doctrine as I seem to know as little as some posters know about their own religion.

I know jack about Methodist belief, but apparently Hillary – who was for years a Sunday school teacher – knew what she was talking about.

Ignorance fought.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saintly\_Loser](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saintly_loser/32/4045_2.png) [@Saintly\_Loser](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saintly_Loser)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2016, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215/120 "2016-10-21T20:22:18Z")

</div>

> [@Dan\_W\_Randolph](#):
>
> Does anyone know who the man behind Trump was that was on his right wearing the big cross? All the people sitting up there reminded me of the James Taggart types in “Atlas Shrugged”.

I was looking at that too. It’s not the Maltese Cross, so he wasn’t a Knight of Malta. It wasn’t the sign of the Knights of Columbus.

I’m guessing it’s the cross of some Catholic order, but I have no idea which one.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/watching-the-alfred-e-smith-dinner/769215.md?page=7)
