usually refer to it as “National” due to inertia. Sometimes Reagan National. Saw a lot of people when I was little call the NYC airport Idlewild, (late 60s) but they eventually changed over.
And in fairness, remember the air traffic controllers thought so much for public safety they violated their no-strike contract. Heaven forbid someone be held to their contract. I don’t remember any crashes afterward, either.
That’s simply untrue, at least here in the D.C. area. I admit that the usage is partly out of habit, but we make an effort not to let that habit dissolve specifically because it’s yet another example of the Congress running D.C. like a plantation.
I’ll refrain from hijacking this thread over the distasteful subject of no-strike clauses, but I will bring up the February 1982 crash just off the 14th Street bridge in DC. Brought about by the same deregulation that pissed the controllers off.
Never could keep it straight once they changed it. “That Washington-National-Ronald-Reagan-Whatever-Airport” is a bit of a mouthful.
I do wonder why some identifiers are used commonly, not others. BWI’s been mentioned (okay, it’s just fun to say), I’ve also seen DFW and LAX pretty often in articles etc…
I saw it spelled Regan Airport on TV the other day. I don’t really ever talk about it, so I would probably try to use whatever name I think the person I’m talking to would understand most readily.